Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for o1ush

Channel

o1ush

@o1ushich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

118subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001228771504
TypeChannel
Username@o1ushich
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/o1ushich

Growth

113118115.57 August 2026 — 113 subscribers8 August 2026 — 114 subscribers9 August 2026 — 114 subscribers16 August 2026 — 115 subscribers30 August 2026 — 116 subscribers7 September 2026 — 118 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 23:18118+2
30 Aug 2026, 17:16116+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:46115+1
9 Aug 2026, 06:02114no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:05114+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:11113first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👌515.2%
custom 5877488510637706502412.1%
💯412.1%
😁412.1%
39.09%
custom 528286899738406648826.06%
custom 534133480663654546626.06%
custom 541836234785084143826.06%
custom 530749515444835167413.03%
custom 546310198279118088713.03%
👍13.03%
👏13.03%
💊13.03%
💔13.03%
🤝13.03%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC44 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ребзя, признавайтесь, кто тоже на одной волне со студентками!

custom 53413348066365454662

8 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👌1👏1custom 54183623478508414381

7 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ИЩУ ДРУЗЕЙ! ❤️ | !tg !donate Стрим уже начался! Заходи скорее 💃 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 22:39:35

👍1custom 54183623478508414381

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @natashirrVideo

Нельзя обидеть, можно только обидеться

custom 58774885106377065021

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @natashirr

Рассказываю, в чем подвох такого подхода В коммуникации есть 2 стороны: 🗣говорящий 👂слушающий У говорящего есть намерение, у слушающего — восприятие. Эти вещи не идентичны. 🔻🟢Говорящий может говорить с намерением обидеть, но слушающий может не воспринять это как нечто обидное. 🟢🔻 Говорящий может говорить без намерения обидеть, но слушающий может обидеться. 🔻🔻Говорящий может говорить с намерением обидеть и слушающи

👌1💯1custom 54631019827911808871custom 58774885106377065021

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

О, в тему про «если обидел - не обижайся»))

custom 53074951544483516741

6 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC79 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ну я…

😁31custom 52828689973840664881

5 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @imdevamariaPhoto

Моя любимая тема: культ книгодрочки. Я при чем уверена, что эти люди даже не были ни разу в библиотеке. И судя по тому, в какие бредовые теории заговора они верят, то читали только желтые газеты про кыштымского карлика. А то что книги типо из деревьев делают, похуй? И что такое количество людей обеспечивать бумажными книгами - это насилие над природой, тоже похуй? Ладно раньше книжка реально была предметом искусств

👌1💊1custom 58774885106377065021

3 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC110 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ребят, давайте сразу так - если вы постоянно ОБИЖАЕТЕСЬ на всякую хуйню собачью, типа моих слов о том, что мне с вами небезопасно бухать; или на то, что я поддерживаю мнение другой стримерши о том, что если кто-то заказывает долгий контент на стрим, то хорошо бы присутствовать при исполнении заказа; или на то, что я не собираюсь выслушивать и принимать к сведению ваши токсичные комменты на тему моей внешности или мо

💯32👌1💔1😁1custom 58774885106377065021

3 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Хочется организовать себе аскезу на алкоголь на август (и какую-то награду назначить себе в случае выполнения этого челленджа) Но как тусить с пьющими подружками без алкоголя - тот еще вопрос….

👌1🤝1custom 52828689973840664881

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @o1ushich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“o1ush” (@o1ushich), 118 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/o1ushich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.