11 measurements spanning 27 days, net +252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,956–4,284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 10:12
4,246
+28
31 Aug 2026, 04:36
4,218
+107
27 Aug 2026, 23:04
4,111
+9
25 Aug 2026, 09:38
4,102
+9
22 Aug 2026, 13:35
4,093
+13
19 Aug 2026, 13:56
4,080
+22
16 Aug 2026, 16:04
4,058
+18
13 Aug 2026, 10:04
4,040
+11
10 Aug 2026, 19:51
4,029
+29
7 Aug 2026, 23:33
4,000
+6
7 Aug 2026, 03:01
3,994
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,602 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,258
70.8%
💋
684
14.9%
🔥
444
9.65%
🎉
117
2.54%
💔
99
2.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,602 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 16 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oalkanda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
очень меня забавляет мысль именно об Арсении-упыре и Антоне-вампире, потому что хтонь-Арсений — это что-то настолько каноничное и настолько подходящее его местами нарочитой утонченности, что представить на месте сытого и лощеного вампира в этой ау его сложнее — с одной стороны да, красота и изящество, а с другой — ну ведь это его эстетика! конечно, отчасти я люблю стереотипы о брезгливости и исключительном роскошеств…
осторожно, 18+
меня очень посмешили мысли об этом тренде в таком исполнении, так что… променяла драму на порно, но крылья у арсения остались
такой прогресс за шесть лет
поняла, что крутилки выйдут слишком дорогими, поэтому будут просто двусторонние брелочки — мне кажется, так прикол тоже не теряется
я не могу, они такие пупсики 😩
арсений голопопый, потому что ничто не должно сковывать движений ахахах
а блузочка антона очень скоро будет грязной кое из-за кого….
вы ещё можете успеть приобрести импро-зин, где участвует много-много импро-художниц/ов и авторок/ов, включая меня и мою великолепную жену (у нас там есть коллабный разворотик)
от меня в зине две картинки! а ещё есть шейкер с красной комнатой в мерче к зину🤩
https://t.me/improdom_zine/143
делаем?
это брелочки с крутящейся частью — получается, голова будет прикреплена, а нижняя часть будет «болтаться»
авторка брелочки с примера — кто-то из типографии Еми (их макет для примера)
арсений-хаски из собачьей аушки 😿 сорвался с цепи и вот что с ним стало
на самом деле, долго думала, чем они в целом могут заниматься — однозначно ничего не придумала, но поняла, что арсений для меня однозначно тот еще драчун — и как пес он точно мог бы драться. может, а молодости, а может, и сейчас занимается профессионально какой-то борьбой? кто знает
хочу сидячий стендик чтоб сидел на краю стола радовал мой глаз
саня фрама-босерон распространите ☺️
он вообще-то неагрессивный, но гипервозбудимый и гиперактивный, иногда не понимает, что заигрался, а потому с ним используются слегка радикальные методы в виде строгача и электроошейника (прим авторки: не использовать без кинолога)
он очень любит оберегать и охранять маленьких собачек (а сам любит одного конкретного спаниеля), считает их жутко милыми, хотя они его побаиваются 😭
в…
неожиданнейший дроп в собачью аушку….. в виде новых персонажей 😗это илья эксайл и саня фреймтеймер — первая проба пера, немного привыкаю к их лицам, но надеюсь, что не последняя 😗
традиционно, поясняю за породы!
илья — английский кокер-спаниель. есть вопросы? дружелюбие, активность, эмоциональность, открытость к людям и самые добри глазки на свете! с кудрявящейся шерстью, ранимым характером, но огромной работоспос…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @oalkanda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Телепропуск @telepropusk · 37,779 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“это что алканда” (@oalkanda), 4,246 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oalkanda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
