Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Прописи преподки

Channel

Прописи преподки

@obsessedteacher

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

237subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495840418
TypeChannel
Username@obsessedteacher
Created26 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/obsessedteacher

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

237242239.57 August 2026 — 242 subscribers8 August 2026 — 242 subscribers24 August 2026 — 238 subscribers17 September 2026 — 237 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 236–243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:17237-1
24 Aug 2026, 11:43238-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:47242no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:56242first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

625 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤35256.3%
😁14823.7%
👍518.16%
🔥406.40%
👏172.72%
🤔60.96%
🤯50.8%
🤩30.48%
😱20.32%
🎉10.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 625 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2022 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Feb 2026, 06:51 UTC253 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Каждый раз меня выносит, когда люди говорят, что "учить язык нужно только с носителем", или "выучить можно только в среде". 1) Водопроводчик тоже носитель. Это не значит, что он хорошо знает язык (да и образованные люди тоже. Можете ли вы, носители русского, объяснить, почему глаза карие, лошадь гнедая, а волосы русые, хотя это один цвет - коричневый?). И тем более не значит, что его можно пускать преподавать. Когда…

❤40👍6🔥2

4 Apr 2025, 11:13 UTC527 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Никто: Абсолютно никто: Мои ученики: I'd like to talk about AARDVARKS!

❤21😁5🤩1

20 Mar 2025, 07:47 UTC610 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Резкий поворот от ошибок учеников — к моим. Сидим в лаборатории и коллега спрашивает, что это ей ревьюеры написали, что ее статья какая-то nuts and bolts. Я не расслышала, и подумала, что она говорит nuts and balls. Ну, думаю, яйца и яйца, могли еще сказать nuts and balls and testicles. Совсем бы был полный набор. Оказалось, что nuts and bolts - это значит, базовые практические детали. (Впрочем, если статья на уров…

😁24👍6

10 Feb 2025, 14:10 UTC600 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нечасто встретишь идеальные переводы, но бывает

🔥28😁5❤2

4 Feb 2025, 11:24 UTC843 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Написала в деловом письме "profdeformationallingly" и смотрю на него с подозрением. С другой стороны, на занятиях иврита на мой вопрос есть ли в каком-то рандомном предложении ошибка, мне ответили "ну зачем говорить "ошибка", это твой вклад в развитие языка". Собираюсь ко всему теперь так относиться.

❤25😁18👏5🤔2

17 Oct 2024, 17:00 UTC935 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как хорошо нарисовали

❤22👍8🔥1

7 Mar 2024, 10:36 UTC≈1,250 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— Sem... Cem... Cemetery... No! А как сказать "начался новый семестр", чтобы не получилось "кладбище"? #репликиучеников

😁27❤7

20 Jul 2023, 14:08 UTC≈1,760 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— (ученица) ...this is a video game for kids like you! — Um. I'm almost forty! — Yes. #репликиучеников

❤35😁6

29 Jun 2023, 13:59 UTC≈1,800 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— I remember a story... it's not actually hard to remember because it happened yesterday! #репликиучеников

😁18

16 Apr 2023, 13:05 UTC≈3,500 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Стало тепло и мокро, а значит грядут экзамены, к которым все готовятся неправильно! Вот это исследование проверило, какие методы самые эффективные для запоминания. Если что, не эффективные — суммирование прочитанного, хайлайтинг (выделение цветом), и перечитывание. Средние результаты показали — уточняющие вопросы (типа читаешь, задаешь сам себе [или получаешь от кого-то] вопросы на понимание, и отвечаешь), и переска…

❤19👍13

9 Feb 2023, 17:10 UTC≈1,230 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— Hi! How was your week? — I was playing with my faggot all week! — ...what? — I was blowing it! #репликиучеников

😁18❤7🤯5

24 Dec 2022, 22:14 UTC≈1,220 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤28😁9👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @obsessedteacher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Прописи преподки” (@obsessedteacher), 237 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obsessedteacher.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.