Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Occult of Personality

Channel

Occult of Personality

@occultofpersonality

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,584subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644717342
TypeChannel
Username@occultofpersonality
Created31 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/occultofpersonality

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5671,5841,575.57 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,573 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,574 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,573 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,582 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,581 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,582 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,584 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 37 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,564–1,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 09:591,584+2
9 Sept 2026, 12:161,582+1
3 Sept 2026, 19:201,581-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:441,582+6
25 Aug 2026, 15:251,576+3
22 Aug 2026, 21:041,573-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:181,574+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:591,573+6
7 Aug 2026, 21:191,567no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:401,567first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3529.4%
🔥2924.4%
2420.2%
👍1210.1%
🏆75.88%
💯54.20%
🕊43.36%
👎32.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 22:53 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️ Ike Baker https://youtu.be/u-vlNvjpM8U?is=_qYMgZ1CX12tlYIL

2

17 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,610 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

New podcast! Georgina Rose — polytheist, ceremonial magician, and Thelemite, and author of Planetary Theurgy: Ascent Through the Seven Veils — joins me to talk about what it actually means to have a spiritual path with a trajectory, rather than a vague collection of borrowed practices. We get into her rejection of psychologized, watered-down approaches to magic, her critique of New Age spirituality’s shallow eclecti

👎32🔥2

20 Jun 2026, 19:42 UTC818 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @true_anarchyPhoto

No eyes will raise to heaven. The pure will be thought insane and the impure will be honoured as wise. The madman will be believed brave, and the wicked esteemed as good. - Hermes Trismegistus 𝕋𝕣𝕦𝕖 𝔸𝕟𝕒𝕣𝕔𝕙𝕪

🏆7🔥52

7 Jun 2026, 18:58 UTC829 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TraditionBooksPhoto

HERITAGE EDITIONS Passport to Magonia Jacques Vallee Throughout history, people have reported the observation of unidentified aerial objects. Descriptions of landings made by these objects are commonplace, and many accounts inform us of the physical characteristics and behavior of their occupants. But investigators have neglected to recognize one important perspective of the phenomenon: the fact that beliefs ident

4🔥1

5 Jun 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,860 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥3

4 Jun 2026, 18:19 UTC696 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

18🔥1

3 Jun 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,610 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

From Thomas Vaughan’s Lumen di Lumine

👍32

2 Jun 2026, 22:49 UTC639 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9👍3💯1🔥1

2 Jun 2026, 14:51 UTC634 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"It is not outer reality that silence reveals, but our own innerness. Silence is essentially a surrender to the holiness of the divine mystery – whether we use these words or not. An atheist, calming his or her spirit in the peace of silence, is irradiated by the same mystery, anonymous but transforming. We are to listen. To what? To silence." ~ Sister Wendy Becket, Meditations on Silence

4💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @occultofpersonality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPPCS POLICE CONSTABLE UPSSSC PET
@up_police_constable_upsssc_pet_Q · 43,627
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Occult of Personality” (@occultofpersonality), 1,584 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/occultofpersonality.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.