Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Погода лайт
@ochen_gozhii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,888subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002149811901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ochen_gozhii |
| Created | 10 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ochen_gozhii |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 1,888 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 1,892 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 1,895 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 1,895 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.37%
- avg views ÷ 1,888 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 158
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (10 June 2024 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 158 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
711 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 392 | 55.1% | |
| 🤝 | 126 | 17.7% | |
| ❤ | 70 | 9.85% | |
| 👎 | 51 | 7.17% | |
| 👌 | 43 | 6.05% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.703% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 0.563% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.563% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.563% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.422% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.422% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.141% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.141% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.141% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.141% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 711 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2024 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 874
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
- Most on one post
- 860
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ochen_gozhii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2024 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Учитывая то обстоятельство, что Чисто Х..., он же огромный тюбик, готовит к новому году харьковчанам подарок с огорчительной начинкой, напоминаю, что мой канал готов принять всех, кого этот лучший тюбик намеревается огорчать. В моём канале есть только одно правило: "ВСЕ ДОЛЖНЫ ОБЩАТСЯ ВЕЖЛИВО" Всех хороших людей с наступающими праздниками!
👍6❤5💊3🔥1
Ну, что гиперактивные борцы за справедливость, довольны ли вы своим большим тюбиком, он же "Чистий Харків", он же "Чисто Харьков", он же Гога, он же Жора? Насколько я заметил ваш сильно обожаемый огромный тюбик взял вас своею костлявою рукою за горло, просто решив, что раз он огромный тюбик, то может менять свои лучшие в мире правила, при каждом своём гормональном сбое. Все, кто прежде уже кидал в меня 💩, с пеной у…
❤6👍3👎3🐳1💊1💯1
.... люди голосуют ногами за Харьков погода. Этот факт не признавать может только слепой. Это при том, что альтернатив Харьков погода предостаточно, но именно там больше всего подписчиков и их число постоянно растёт. Я подобным жестоким способом, как Харьков погода, действовать никогда не буду, я надеюсь на сознательность подписчиков моего канала в вопросе поддержания здесь элементарного порядка. Правда я посчитал п…
👍93❤20👎5🤝4🤡3👻1
Подводя итоги опроса, могу сказать, что двум третям подписчиков моего канала он нужен. Предположу, что это люди, которым, как и мне надоела ругань, хамство и грязь, которая нас зачастую окружает в реальном мире. Так же отмечу, что треть подписчиков желает закрытия канала или превращение его в придаток Чистого Харькова, в котором грязь прям насаждается с самого верха. В мой адрес было брошено немало лестных слов: и,…
👍22👎5🤝2❤1
Согласны ли вы, что раз "Чистый Харьков" вернулся из отдыха, этот канал уже не нужен и его можно закрыть?
- Да33%
- Нет67%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как порядочный человек, считаю своим долгом высказаться по ситуации, имеющей место между каналами "Чистий Харків" и "Харьков погода". Касательно "Харьков погода" могу откровенно сообщить, что я к ним обратился с просьбой стать отдушиной тем, кого там наказывают. В ответ на мою просьбу мне предложили достигнуть определённой договорённости, согласно которой будет строиться наше взаимодействие. Такая договорённость был…
👎37👍11💯4🤷♂3🤝2😱1
Уважаемые подписчики моего скромного канала, обстоятельства вынуждают обраться к вам со скромной просьбой. Сервис автопостинга, которым я пользуюсь платный. Когда я начинал этот канал его стоимость была для меня вполне по силам. И вообще, честно говоря, я надеялся, что мой канал поможет выровнять взаимоотношения между администрацией Харьков погода🌦️ и теми, кого там забанили за нарушение их правил, и я смогу оставить…
👍53❤6🕊4
Прошу прошения вторую неделю в командировке, замотался просто в хлам и пропустил, что закончились запланированные ежедневные посты. Внёс в план все традиционные посты канала, первым сегодня вечером будет пост для поговорить, а с утра все остальные. Надеюсь вы проявите ко мне😔 снисходительность🙏🏻
👌43👍21❤17
Окно 🪟 для ваших предложений. Предложения пишите кратко и по делу. P.S. Длинные сообщения удаляет мой помощник Мухтар🐶.
👍30❤2
Каналу нужно ограничиться обсуждением Харькова и Харьковской области?
- Да, только Харьков и Харьковская область.96%
- Нет, любой регион.4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍46❤3👎1
Информация от моего товарища, буду рад, если она будет вам полезной🤗
🤝118👍29👀3❤🔥2❤1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ochen_gozhii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Согласны ли вы, что раз "Чистый Харьков" вернулся из отдыха, этот канал уже не нужен и его можно закрыть?
- Да33%
- Нет67%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каналу нужно ограничиться обсуждением Харькова и Харьковской области?
- Да, только Харьков и Харьковская область.96%
- Нет, любой регион.4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2024 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Погода лайт” (@ochen_gozhii), 1,888 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ochen_gozhii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.