Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for D3f4ult's Trades

Channel

D3f4ult's Trades

@official_d3f4ult

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,319subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001998338032
TypeChannel
Username@official_d3f4ult
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 September 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/official_d3f4ult

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3191,3301,324.517 September 2026 — 1,323 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,323 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,320 subscribers29 September 2026 — 1,330 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,329 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,325 subscribers15 October 2026 — 1,323 subscribers21 October 2026 — 1,319 subscribers17 September 202621 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 34 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,317–1,332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Oct 2026, 08:271,319-4
15 Oct 2026, 14:461,323-2
12 Oct 2026, 21:271,325-4
6 Oct 2026, 10:161,329-1
29 Sept 2026, 18:571,330+10
19 Sept 2026, 06:211,320-3
17 Sept 2026, 17:221,323no change
17 Sept 2026, 16:471,323first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8755.4%
❤5937.6%
👍74.46%
🥰21.27%
👏10.637%
🦄10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 14:05 UTC316 views13 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Aaaaaand $frong just got listed and ripped to 20M. I told yall I don’t fucking miss when are yall going to listen lmao

🔥8❤2👍2👏1

2 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC579 views12 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

if you bought $frong when i called it out here you should be up roughly 3x today

❤8🔥4

1 Sept 2026, 02:39 UTC611 views25 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

I finally finished and launched my Robinhood Trading Terminal called Bifrost (which used to be HoodBot). You can fund your account with SOL and it will automatically bridge to ETH to trade with. Im integrating proprietary indicators from ApolloAlgo. We have the deepest referral system in crypto, 5 layers deep and up to 33% of users fees. You will need an invite code to join. https://bifrost.mezzanine.fund

🔥17❤5🥰2👍1

23 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC925 views36 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

if you bought $cyberleek when i called it out you are up 34x at the peak. nobody else is doing what i do

🔥25❤10🦄1

22 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC853 views22 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LADS

🔥18❤3👍1

22 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC716 views10 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

if you bought the cyberleek token you should be up 2.5x now hes making demands in regards to the marketcap of the token, the higher the more leaks this things is going to fly ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg

❤6👍3🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC696 views4 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

dude has the entire GTA6 game and launched a token not sure how this isnt at 100M yet ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg

❤3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC736 views5 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

if you bought this when i called it your up like 700% now lets goooooo $purr 0xD928A068d2B90798373a470c9D9bA562322ACdeF

❤5

9 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC710 views3 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

if you bought $frong when i mentioned you should be up +50-75% already the chart looks amazing since the change of trend was confirmed 0x6245e67affA44a23077f0Ea7f981a8DC743a0c47

🔥2❤1

9 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC677 views2 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

someone found a Lottie animation file on the Robinhood server and when you generate a gif with the source code you get this someone launched the token $purr based on this and i think its a decent bid under 500k 0xD928A068d2B90798373a470c9D9bA562322ACdeF

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @official_d3f4ult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GS Memecoins (Public)
@degenwar · 23,058
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“D3f4ult's Trades” (@official_d3f4ult), 1,319 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/official_d3f4ult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.