Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Оганесиани

Channel

Оганесиани

@oganesiani

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,111subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002130347051
TypeChannel
Username@oganesiani
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oganesiani

Growth

6,1116,1696,1405 August 2026 — 6,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,164 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,158 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,147 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,142 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,139 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,126 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,114 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,113 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,111 subscribers5 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,102–6,178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 19:436,111-2
29 Aug 2026, 19:286,113-1
26 Aug 2026, 12:386,114-12
23 Aug 2026, 04:076,126-13
19 Aug 2026, 17:216,139-3
16 Aug 2026, 17:526,142-5
13 Aug 2026, 02:566,147-11
10 Aug 2026, 03:126,158-6
6 Aug 2026, 22:236,164-5
6 Aug 2026, 03:216,169no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:066,169first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,073 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣85941.4%
58628.3%
👍32015.4%
🎉1296.22%
🤡924.44%
👏874.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,778
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
1,140
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oganesiani. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC≈1,920 views113 reactions21 Starsread 12 August 2026

Кстати! Я не рассказывал На днях Роспатент зарегистрировал логотип Москвача и наименование "Москвач" как товарный знак Теперь бренд защищен!

👍6827🎉18

5 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈2,060 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я давно хотел освежить логотип Москвача, так как он меня стал раздражать и ощущаться каким-то тяжелым и древним. Но при этом для меня было важно сохранить его узнаваемость, фирменные цвета и общий стиль. Что изменил: • Закруглил углы — логотип стал мягче и современнее. Были очень острые и это отталкивало. • Сделал цвет светлее и спокойнее, чтобы уйти от слишком серьёзного. Хочу, чтобы от лого было больше молодежно

👍3313🎉9

30 Jul 2026, 23:39 UTC≈3,260 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @moscowach

Posted without readable text

20👍9🎉7

29 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈3,140 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ничего не залетело, прикиньте Вообще ничего 😂

🤣9010🤡6

25 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC≈4,810 views92 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Если ничего из этого не получится, попробуем со страничкой в Одноклассниках

🤣8012

25 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC≈5,020 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ищу креативного редактора из Москвы для ведения аккаунта Москвача в Threads (принадлежит Meta, деятельность которой признана экстремистской и запрещена в РФ) Главная задача — придумывать посты о Москве, которые хочется обсуждать. Не новости ради новостей, а темы, под которыми люди будут спорить, шутить и оставлять сотни комментариев. Никаких анкет и резюме не нужно. Просто подготовьте здесь в комментариях один пос

🤡50🤣2423

24 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC≈4,440 views170 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣152🎉11👏7

28 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC≈5,960 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Худшее из возможных начало диалога

🤣12025👍14

26 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTC≈6,760 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Заметил, что за последнюю неделю охваты на всех ру каналах выросли на 15-20%. Есть тренд, ему способствуют в том числе и новости про удаления из эпстор

60🎉23👍18

12 Jun 2026, 08:13 UTC≈6,930 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мечтаю о том, чтобы в Telegram появилась возможность сделать рассылку среди тех, кто подал заявку на вступление в чат 😂

🤣62👏189

4 Jun 2026, 13:54 UTC≈7,850 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

После новости о том, что Макс удалили из App Store мои коллеги предположили, что проблема не такая глобальная, так как мессенджером, наверное, особо и не пользовались владельцы айфонов. Стало интересно, правда ли это. Поскольку в Макс так и не добавили опросы на каналах, пришлось спросить аудиторию через эмодзи. Конкретно по опросу в Москваче (надо учитывать, что аудитория столицы) видно, что большинство (65%) подп

45🤣25👏8

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @oganesiani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Официальный канал Телеметра - Telemetr.me
@telemetr_me · 37,159
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
Марзаганов вещает
@marzaganoff · 75,177
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Оганесиани” (@oganesiani), 6,111 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oganesiani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.