Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чай со вкусом Питера

Channel

Чай со вкусом Питера

@ogprinces

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,027subscribers

-152 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001328652622
TypeChannel
Username@ogprinces
Created18 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ogprinces

Growth

9,0279,1799,1037 August 2026 — 9,179 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,175 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,166 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,152 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,136 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,116 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,106 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,092 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,076 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,064 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,047 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,027 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 32 days, net -152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,004–9,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 10:009,027-20
3 Sept 2026, 14:579,047-17
31 Aug 2026, 10:169,064-12
28 Aug 2026, 14:229,076-16
25 Aug 2026, 04:269,092-14
22 Aug 2026, 05:169,106-10
19 Aug 2026, 06:159,116-20
16 Aug 2026, 15:229,136-16
13 Aug 2026, 06:569,152-14
10 Aug 2026, 06:319,166-9
7 Aug 2026, 15:479,175-4
7 Aug 2026, 00:159,179first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.17%
avg views ÷ 9,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
738
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held42 (31 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total10,329
Reactions total714
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,087 reactions across 42 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,60276.8%
❤‍🔥25312.1%
🔥733.50%
👻532.54%
💔492.35%
😍341.63%
🍓231.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,087 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC156 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026

вернуться бы в те времена, когда мама уносила меня из ванной в большом полотенце.

14❤‍🔥6🔥5

28 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC245 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026

когда мои истории лайкают, я всегда открываю список лайкнувших, чтобы посмотреть на этих красивых, умных и уважаемых людей

35❤‍🔥8

26 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC386 views106 reactionsread 28 August 2026

этим постом я зарядила вас на деньги. завтра вы получите неожиданное поступление средств на ваш счёт. необходимо лишь поставить лайк, чтобы вселенная верно считала этот сигнал

77❤‍🔥22👻7

26 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC483 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026

мой словарный запас в 13: резистентный, коррелирует, априори, абстрагироваться, эгоцентрично, отнюдь мой вокабуляр сейчас: жесть, хз, нишево, не оч, вайб, 67

42❤‍🔥5

25 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC550 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Недавно наткнулась на слова одного мужчины, говорящего: «Если моя жена слишком много думает, то я буду чрезмерным объяснителем. У меня нет проблем с тем, чтобы успокоить ее разум. Я думаю, что это любовь.

46

23 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC652 views56 reactionsread 28 August 2026

тебе не нужно ничего заслуживать. все твои чувства естественны, а все переживания временны. нет, тебя не слишком много и не слишком мало. не бойся отпустить то, что уходит, иначе не придёт то, о чём ты просишь. хорошие вещи требуют времени, а хорошие люди - хорошего отношения. каждый бережёт тебя настолько, насколько нуждается в тебе. всё всегда случается вовремя.

43🍓7❤‍🔥6

22 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC667 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026

она 10/10, но она наказывает людей молчанием, у неё сложный характер, она может обидеться из-за пустяка, многое держит в себе, принимает всё близко к сердцу, задумывается над каждым словом, а если почувствует холод, сразу уходит. исчезает, когда ей плохо.

45

21 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC712 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026

если человек сам ушел из вашей жизни, не стоит надеяться. удаляйте все. идиотские переписки, контакты, фотографии. меняйте все пароли, маршруты по городу, привычки. не нужно выискивать родную улыбку, запах, взгляд или знакомую куртку в автобусе. все это нафиг. потому что, если человек захотел уйти, пусть уходит целиком.

53

19 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC848 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026

«он заплатил за мои ногти» «он купил мне эту сумку» «он всегда платит за ужин» он не кричит на меня. он не манипулирует мной. он не заставляет меня чувствовать себя вариантом. мне не нужны его деньги, его любви достаточно.

45

17 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC≈1,000 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026

моя проблема в том, что как только я привязываюсь к кому-то, мое настроение начинает зависеть от того, как этот человек относится ко мне. потому что я замечаю все, каждую мелочь.

37🍓10❤‍🔥6

16 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,120 views55 reactionsread 28 August 2026

«выйди на 5 минут» - это как «я люблю тебя», но только в 100 раз круче

❤‍🔥4114

15 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈1,030 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026

поразительно, как 3 минуты не с тем человеком кажутся вечностью, в то время как 3 часа с тем, кто нужен, пролетают как одно мгновение.

51

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @ogprinces. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ТЁМА ТУЛЕНОВ
@tulenov_tema · 144,103
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чай со вкусом Питера” (@ogprinces), 9,027 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ogprinces.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.