Video message, posted without a caption
❤26🤩2🥰2💅1custom 53236103656641970691

Channel
@oh_pollyboooks
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,399subscribers
+345 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001734895513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oh_pollyboooks |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oh_pollyboooks |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 18,399 | +211 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 18,188 | -23 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 18,211 | -24 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 18,235 | -47 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 18,282 | -46 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 18,328 | -22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 18,350 | -30 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 18,380 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 18,390 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 18,413 | -36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 18,449 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 18,435 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 18,445 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 18,447 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 18,458 | +28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 18,430 | +80 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 18,350 | +289 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 18,061 | -23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 18,084 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 18,103 | first reading |
42 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 23,330 |
| Reactions total | 959 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,740 reactions across 42 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,707 | 45.6% | |
| 💘 | 419 | 11.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 331 | 8.85% | |
| 🥰 | 236 | 6.31% | |
| 😍 | 216 | 5.78% | |
| custom 5323610365664197069 | 200 | 5.35% | |
| 🤗 | 148 | 3.96% | |
| 💋 | 137 | 3.66% | |
| 🔥 | 124 | 3.32% | |
| 🤩 | 61 | 1.63% | |
| 😘 | 50 | 1.34% | |
| 👍 | 47 | 1.26% | |
| 💅 | 27 | 0.722% | |
| 👀 | 12 | 0.321% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 0.214% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.16% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 0.134% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.053% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.027% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.027% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.053% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,740 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤26🤩2🥰2💅1custom 53236103656641970691
Спаси меня, если сможешь увесистый томик от Азбуки с мерчем и завораживающая новинка «Лейкстоун» Сары Ривенс, наконец, у меня! 🩶 🐍ОН – опасный наёмник 🐍ОНА – простая студентка 🐍Серая мораль 🐍Запретная связь 🐍Slowburn
❤31💘6custom 53236103656641970694🤩3💅1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤32❤🔥8😍4
💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 да, знаю-знаю, для многих это сейчас максимально неожиданно, но на протяжении весны и лета озвучивать книги Анны Джейн – это моя реальность! наконец-то обе части вышли и вы теперь можете послушать не только как я озвучиваю аудиокниги, но и как пою 🥹 ведь «Небесная музыка» и сама звучит, как самая волшебная мелодия любви 🎧 хочу выразить огромную благодарность Родиной Ольге за доверие, Лемешко Дмитрию за п…
🤗34🔥20❤12🥰2custom 53236103656641970692🍾1💅1
⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🥾 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️собрала для вас подборку самых атмосферных историй и целый книжный TBR *To-Be-Read* list для чтения в этот красивый период! 📇 берите истории на заметку, делитесь с друзьями иии рассказывайте: что точно планируете успеть прочесть в этот уютный сезон? 🍁📔
❤🔥35❤17💘10🤗3
Одной любви недостаточно..? 🥹 📌 3 сентября | 14:00–14:45 📌 Площадка 8. Молодёжная литература/комиксы, ММКЯ Вместе с NoSugar, Торией Дрим и Вероникой Артт мы поговорим о том как создавать героев, чьи интересы не ограничиваются любовной линией, какую роль в романтической истории играют увлечения и профессии персонажей и почему современному читателю важно видеть за отношениями самостоятельную историю? Я выступлю моде…
❤29🔥15💋5🦄2
☀📚❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ давайте вместе распакуем тёплую книжную посылку от дорогой моему сердцу Адрианы Дари? ❗ 🖐 7️⃣❤❤❤❤❤ автора, которую я уже читаю 📗, представляете?) совсем скоро поделюсь с вами книжным влогом как я открываю подарочки и наслаждаюсь комфортным чтением солнечной истории!
❤37🤗12🥰11💘5🤩3🦄1
последний летний день и.. как же хочется на море 🥹 уверена, что с этой книгой можно окунуться в тёплое лето и отправиться в отпуск, даже если вы, как и я, забыли уже что значит это слово..))) 🤩🤩 любимые Story Craft в очередной раз создали нечто потрясающее 🤩 – лично я готова скупать у них всё – в этот раз держу в руках самый зефирный бокс с книжной новинкой Даны и Trendbooks наполнение просто В А У 🤩 а вы этим лето…
❤55💘12😍9🦄2
по-настоящему нишево – читать одного и того же автора аж с 2018, будучи простым читателем, на заре своего блога, а годы спустя, волею судьбы, оказаться в числе ~20 человек на камерной встрече Яндекс Книги, Альпины и, конечно же, Оли Птицевой – мурашечные ощущения скажу я вам! ‘провалы’ будут дарить весь месяц в необычном баре do not disturb при заказе коктейля! вайбы такой родной до боли Полыни присутствуют, а незабы…
custom 532361036566419706944❤26🤩12💘5❤🔥1
любимая Рина Кент и Мейнстрим вновь радуют нас новыми книгами 🥹💙 о «Чёрном Рыцаре» я уже рассказывала вам здесь, пришло время познакомиться ближе! 🤭 💔 долгожданное продолжение серии «Королевская элита» 💔 тёмная романтика 💔 от ненависти к любви 💔 друзья детства 💔 буллинг романс поделитесь впечатлениями, если уже успели прочесть и срочно берите на заметку, если не знакомы с книгами автора, я настаиваю 👌🚨
❤🔥39❤21🤗6custom 53236103656641970695💘1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤23💘15custom 53236103656641970699🥰4🤩2😍1
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 👌 книголюбы, вашим книжным мужчинам и историям на полках предстоят подвинуться, ведь я нашла бриллиант! уже начала читать и нахожусь в полнейшем восторге от этой книги 🥹💫 «Кровь Утопающих» Кейли Кэссиди от издательства Азбука, улетит в топ года, вот просто попомните моё слово! 🙌 берите на заметку и делитесь, если уже успели прочесть 🌜
❤54💅11🥰9🤩3💘1custom 53236103656641970691
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @oh_pollyboooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“уголок уюта и тепла || oh_pollybooks” (@oh_pollyboooks), 18,399 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oh_pollyboooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.