Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В ОИ ОСУЖДАЮТ

Channel

В ОИ ОСУЖДАЮТ

@oihamstvo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

-252 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003922726073
TypeChannel
Username@oihamstvo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oihamstvo

Growth

313191757 August 2026 — 301 subscribers8 August 2026 — 301 subscribers8 August 2026 — 319 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39 subscribers9 September 2026 — 49 subscribers497 August 20269 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 33 days, net -252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 09:4049+10
31 Aug 2026, 04:1439+4
23 Aug 2026, 21:1535+4
16 Aug 2026, 15:1931-288
8 Aug 2026, 13:39319+18
8 Aug 2026, 08:01301no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:42301first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5314679225985300528640.0%
custom 5210803706764752625320.0%
custom 5368527112170925683320.0%
custom 5210968302796436151213.3%
custom 531451936300757407916.67%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/taiga_oi/5762 Ты блять заебала уже. Сколько раз ты меняешь канал? Уже честно достала

Signed # 𝘿͔͑͟𝙄̧̧̖𝙎̛͎͔𝙇̧͜𝘼̄͂͟𝙑͉̀͘𝘼̶̴͓

8 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026

джей даблви. ужасная компания, с ужасным отношением к артистам. мало того, что они не учитывают мнение самих артистов, считая, что их мнение единственное правильное, так они ещё и набирают людей «из жалости». а когда группы от них уходит, из-за отношения, как к кучке мусора - их директора бегают по лс бывших участников их группы и пытаются внушить им, мол «вы сами виноваты, нужно было просто смириться с нашим решение

Signed # 𝘿͔͑͟𝙄̧̧̖𝙎̛͎͔𝙇̧͜𝘼̄͂͟𝙑͉̀͘𝘼̶̴͓

8 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/QROPIESS/964?single блять, нахуя брать почти полностью корейскую песню, если у вас только одна участница его учит. мне уже страшно, я представляю какие мямли в своих партиях будут нести другие участницы...

Signed # 𝘿͔͑͟𝙄̧̧̖𝙎̛͎͔𝙇̧͜𝘼̄͂͟𝙑͉̀͘𝘼̶̴͓

8 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026

Мэирин, что она пытается доказать с переписками, если директор Нурикко энт прав?

Signed # 𝘿͔͑͟𝙄̧̧̖𝙎̛͎͔𝙇̧͜𝘼̄͂͟𝙑͉̀͘𝘼̶̴͓

8 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026

Чонхи какая-то обиженка, когда ей говорят что навыки не оч спрашивает что улучшить, будто ей поможет

Signed # 𝘿͔͑͟𝙄̧̧̖𝙎̛͎͔𝙇̧͜𝘼̄͂͟𝙑͉̀͘𝘼̶̴͓

8 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/chonghee_oi Блять, пояему у неё такие хуевые навыки..

Signed # 𝘿͔͑͟𝙄̧̧̖𝙎̛͎͔𝙇̧͜𝘼̄͂͟𝙑͉̀͘𝘼̶̴͓

7 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC122 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/HIRUMKARRR С каждым разом эра все хуже и хуже.. Хирум, не устала делать эру? Бедняжка.

custom 52108037067647526252custom 53146792259853005282custom 52109683027964361511custom 53145193630075740791custom 53685271121709256831

Signed ᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ/gamemode

7 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC125 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/blink_2626 Данную компанию, она ужасно относится к артистам, в буквальном смысле, + участницы группы как птицы в клетке, а старший админ ужасно неуважителен, как и владелец, пытались убедить девочек в мнимой свободе выбора (это совсем не так)

custom 53685271121709256832custom 52109683027964361511custom 53146792259853005281

Signed ᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ/gamemode

7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC145 viewsread 8 August 2026

Элис. Вечно хайпиться на свое прошлое и на это хочет собрать аудиторию. Ещё и вечно недовольная и в маленьком возрасте говорит ужасные слова, грубая. Сегодня подала заявку в ее группу. А она говорит "у вас ужасные навыки с чем думали когда поадли заявку?" Если честно это выглядит ужасно. И у нее самой навыки не дотягивается даже до среднего уровня. Кароче грубая.

Signed GO0D — гуд( み )

7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC139 viewsread 8 August 2026

эту группу https://t.me/Tokkis_oigroop спамят в бот сплетен ои стикерами из-за того, что сказали что они лицемерны https://t.me/goss1p_oi/168

Signed GO0D — гуд( み )

7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC139 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/viruscv агро девочки, которые не умеют принимать адекватную критику😂

Signed GO0D — гуд( み )

7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC144 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/k_osoi/447 Кто дал тебе права решать это, не посоветовавшись с остальными? С твоей стороны, дорогая, это выглядит ужасно. Ты выбрала не рассказать о том, что тебе тяжело тем, кого ты назвала сёстрами, дочерьми, а закрыть то, что так хорошо продвигалось. Ты могла бы попросить помощи, но выбрала такой путь. Тебя не оправдывает то, что тебе было тяжело.

Signed ㅤㅤℳ .

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oihamstvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В ОИ ОСУЖДАЮТ” (@oihamstvo), 49 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oihamstvo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.