Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Oilbeater 的自习室

Channel

Oilbeater 的自习室

@oilbeater_studyroom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,052subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002275392346
TypeChannel
Username@oilbeater_studyroom
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oilbeater_studyroom

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9631,0521,007.56 August 2026 — 964 subscribers7 August 2026 — 963 subscribers13 August 2026 — 978 subscribers21 August 2026 — 988 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,010 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,015 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,017 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,032 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,036 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,052 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 41 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 950–1,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 14:011,052+16
13 Sept 2026, 01:591,036+4
9 Sept 2026, 08:571,032+15
3 Sept 2026, 15:391,017+2
31 Aug 2026, 18:561,015+5
28 Aug 2026, 13:121,010+22
21 Aug 2026, 08:57988+10
13 Aug 2026, 13:18978+15
7 Aug 2026, 00:14963-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:04964first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5272.2%
1216.7%
🐳45.56%
👏22.78%
👀11.39%
🔥11.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC245 viewsread 6 August 2026

Jeff Dean 也跑路了https://x.com/i/status/2085034604172603724

5 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC314 viewsread 6 August 2026

看 Cloudflare 的量化方法是传输的时候精度量化压缩,计算的时候再精度还原,属于是用计算换传输了 https://blog.cloudflare.com/smaller-faster-safer-models/

3 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC427 viewsread 6 August 2026

还新加了个 uuid 的标准库,又能清理掉一些第三方依赖了

3 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 6 August 2026

Golang 的下个版本终于支持 SIMD 了 https://victoriametrics.com/blog/go-1-27/index.html#portable-simd

1 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC576 viewsread 6 August 2026

发现我之前对 Overlay 网络封装的路径理解是错的,这些年白干了。

31 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC619 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

越来越期待 DeepSeek 的 Harness 和 RL 方法了,难道是 Harness 和 RL 产生了飞轮自己滚起来了。

🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC622 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

MiniMax 在急速扩张,欢迎感兴趣的小伙伴来找我内推,也可以找我了解详细情况 https://vrfi1sk8a0.jobs.feishu.cn/referral/position/share/?token=NTsxNzg1NTA3OTUyMjM0Ozc2Njc3NTg4MTQ3MjQxNDgxNzc7NzY2ODY4ODQ2MTA5MjU1NTA1OTsxLzE

5

31 Jul 2026, 06:33 UTC604 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

看小字这次测试用的是 DeepSeek 自己的 Harness,有没有可能是因为 Harness 很强分数增强的。

4

31 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC544 viewsread 6 August 2026

然后觉得固定轨迹完全没感觉,下周还是用哑铃吧。

31 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC538 viewsread 6 August 2026

在 MiniMax 一周学会了很多新东西,比如学会了史密斯深蹲。

30 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC572 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

拉引体向上把三头拉伤,我也是太厉害了

👍3

29 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC665 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

AI 降临派选择了自己的阵营

👍32👏2👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oilbeater_studyroom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oilbeater 的自习室” (@oilbeater_studyroom), 1,052 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oilbeater_studyroom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.