Channel
@oipi_nanb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
463subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002234987642 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oipi_nanb |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oipi_nanb |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 463 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 460 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 458 | +6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 452 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 453 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 457 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 456 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 456 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 30.6% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 27.8% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 21.3% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 16.7% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚜 Точное земледелие: сверили часы почву перед стартом 🌱 В рамках подготовки к старту масштабного проекта по цифровому развитию сельского хозяйства состоялась рабочая поездка заместителя генерального директора по научной и инновационной работе Андрея Александровича Говина и младшего научного сотрудника отдела интеллектуальных сервисов Марии Михайловны Слесаревой на базу Республиканского сельскохозяйственного дочернег…
👍2🔥2❤1
🦉«Шазамим» голоса белорусских птиц 🤩 На ярмарке «Цифровые технологии и ИИ» отдел интеллектуальных сервисов ОИПИ НАН Беларуси представил технологию распознавания голосов птиц — систему для автономного непрерывного мониторинга биоразнообразия, основанную на технологиях ИИ. ⏺ Заведующая отделом Ольга Дыдо рассказала о том, как велась работа над проектом, как можно использовать разработку в научных целях и в повседневн…
🔥6👍4❤3
🧠Как заставить мобильного робота ехать ровно там, где трясёт? 🌫Решение найдено в лаборатории робототехнических систем ОИПИ НАН Беларуси. И его на ярмарке инновационных разработок «Цифровые технологии и ИИ» представил Артём Радкевич, младший научный сотрудник. 🛞 Это всенаправленное мотор-колесо нового типа. Его ключевая особенность — тесная связка механики и нейронки. 📡 Подписывайтесь на Новости науки и IT
🔥6👍5
🚀 Уже завтра учёные ОИПИ НАН Беларуси представят свои инновационные разработки на ярмарке «Цифровые технологии и искусственный интеллект», которая пройдёт в Минске и объединит разработчиков перспективных отечественных технологий в области искусственного интеллекта и цифровой трансформации. 👍 В рамках деловой программы участники презентуют инновационные проекты, обсудят перспективы их внедрения и практического примен…
🔥5👍2❤1
🗞️Целая полоса газеты «Рэспублiка» – нашим учёным! 💻В лаборатории математической кибернетики под руководством Александра Васильевича Тузикова разработали современный инструмент, который позволяет использовать технологии ИИ в создании лекарственных средств. 👉Хотите узнать подробности? Переходите по ссылке! 📡 Подписывайтесь на Новости науки и IT
🔥9👍2🥰2
🇧🇾🤝🇨🇳 В ОИПИ НАН Беларуси высадился научный «десант» из Китая 📚 Сегодня в ОИПИ НАН Беларуси стартовала стажировка группы представителей Колледжа электронных наук и технологий Национального университета оборонных технологий КНР, прибывшей из города Чанша (провинция Хунань). 🗓Две недели гостей ждут интенсивные учебные занятия под руководством: заведующего лабораторией математической кибернетики Александра Васильевича…
❤9👍3🤝1
📚 В преддверии 70-летия академика НАН Беларуси Сергея Владимировича Абламейко издательство «Беларуская навука» выпустило его новую книгу — «Обучая компьютер видеть. Развитие компьютерного зрения в Беларуси». 👨💻 На страницах монографии главный научный сотрудник ОИПИ НАН Беларуси, доктор технических наук рассказывает, как формировался облик современной белорусской науки: от первых исследований в советское время до с…
👏7👍6❤4🔥2
😵 Успешные запуски спутников, уникальные снимки Земли из космоса и официальное признание Генеральной Ассамблеей ООН: своё 30-летие отмечают Геоинформационные системы! 🌌 Девиз предприятия-юбиляра звучит гордо: «Наследие прошлого — технологии будущего!». 🎉 Поздравляем коллег, чей труд сделал возможным создать в Беларуси космическую отрасль. Желаем не терять запал первооткрывателей, покорять новые горизонты, претворят…
👏8❤4👍4
🌟 ОИПИ НАН Беларуси — цифровой суверенитет строится здесь! 🤝 Состоялась рабочая встреча с руководством Информационно-издательского центра по налогам и сборам. Предприятие является «офисом цифровизации» МНС. 👥 Тема диалога — стратегическое партнёрство в сфере высоких технологий. Институт готов поделиться экспертизой в области ИИ, анализа больших данных и информационной безопасности для модернизации сервисов в сфере …
👍5👏3❤1🤝1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @oipi_nanb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | United Institute of Informatics Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus |
|---|---|
| Description | an organization in Belarus in fundamental and applied research on information technologies |
| Official site | http://uiip.bas-net.by/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости науки и IT | ОИПИ НАН Беларуси” (@oipi_nanb), 463 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oipi_nanb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.