我不知道,我也不想说,我只记得当时整个警察局都停电了,只有电棍他还满电

Channel
杨门官方频道
@ok_fh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
17,809subscribers
+12,289 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002088370903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ok_fh |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ok_fh |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 17,809 | +10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 17,799 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 17,801 | -79 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 17,880 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 17,883 | +47 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 17,836 | +13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:13 | 17,823 | +24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:43 | 17,799 | +31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:26 | 17,768 | +56 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:59 | 17,712 | +15,099 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 2,613 | +192 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 2,421 | -1,423 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 3,844 | -30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 3,874 | -1,643 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 5,517 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 5,520 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.36%
- avg views ÷ 17,809 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 420
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.564%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (3 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 11,340 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 48 | 38.7% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 15.3% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 14.5% | |
| 🖕 | 17 | 13.7% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 8.06% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 6.45% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Voice message, posted without a caption
Q反自助机器人回归 价格美丽 老味道 12U 人工客服 @gaojiedi 自助机器人 @QQ_sjhbot
🤬1
透露一下 方阳也是我徒弟
❤1
交流群 @mm22xx 晚点发大红包
🧧 老杨@gaojiedi 发送了一个红包 💵总金额:2 USDT💰 剩余:0/50 🥇 0.07(22:18:12) 💰 - 老杨@gao... 🥈 0.07(22:25:56) 💰 - 神 🥉 0.07(22:23:58) 💰 - Lame 🧧 0.06(22:24:57) 💰 - JoStos 🧧 0.06(22:24:38) 💰 - QQ 🧧 0.06(22:23:31) 💰 - jiāngn... 🧧 0.06(22:23:05) 💰 - 狗奶 🧧 0.06(22:18:47) 💰 - Naive 🧧 0.06(22:23:03) 💰 - Bernar... 🧧 0.06(22:22:18) 💰 - gebian 🧧 0.05(22:18:18) 💰 - 宁静致远 🧧 0.05(22:25:24) 💰 - 好好先生(@... 🧧 0.05(22:23:26) 💰 - G. 🧧 0.05(22:20:45) 💰 - 汐
交流群 @mm22xx 晚点发红包
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
我先说清楚一点,不是我策划的,只不过是困境私信我 说能不能发频道 我看了挺可怜的,刚好我前任也私信我,问我会不会骗这种人 我就发了 捐款50块钱 然后今天晚上 有人跟我说是骗子,后来小旗私信我 说是我的徒弟 给我退款200 明白了吗 别动不动吗把屎盆子给我 交流群 @mm22xx 小旗也是管理员,我只是蹭一波流量
🤔2
被骗888的小旗居然是老杨徒弟 进来 观看 @mm22xx
Photo, posted without a caption
才发现这居然是我的徒弟,杨门牛逼666
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @ok_fh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ok_fh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 31 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杨门官方频道” (@ok_fh), 17,809 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ok_fh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.