Channel

OKR Russia

@okr_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,968subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001468476965
Type	Channel
Username	@okr_ru
Created	Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	10 September 2026
Measurements held	11
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/okr_ru

Growth

11 measurements spanning 34 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,965–2,992 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
10 Sept 2026, 04:56	2,968	-9
5 Sept 2026, 05:38	2,977	-3
1 Sept 2026, 01:34	2,980	-3
25 Aug 2026, 21:35	2,983	-4
23 Aug 2026, 03:44	2,987	-2
19 Aug 2026, 23:24	2,989	+10
16 Aug 2026, 18:55	2,979	-4
13 Aug 2026, 09:17	2,983	-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:17	2,985	+3
7 Aug 2026, 12:06	2,982	+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:03	2,981	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 21m 42s
Average length: 3m 37s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
🔥	35	20.7%
❤	22	13.0%
🤩	20	11.8%
👍	19	11.2%
👏	17	10.1%
🙏	8	4.73%
🤣	8	4.73%
⚡	7	4.14%
😁	7	4.14%
🤪	7	4.14%
💯	6	3.55%
🏆	4	2.37%
🤝	4	2.37%
🆒	1	0.592%
👌	1	0.592%
👻	1	0.592%
🤔	1	0.592%
🫡	1	0.592%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC142 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Video

Ближайшие события: • бесплатный курс самообучения «Быстрый старт в ИИ»: https://c-lead.link/dg0ve9, «Быстрый старт в OKR»: https://c-lead.link/ioqjxw. • 20 августа — конференция OKR Russia: https://c-lead.link/d34ym0. • 2 сентября — бесплатный семинар «Обзор OKR»: https://c-lead.link/fd2ee2. • 9 сентября — школа «Мастер OKR»: https://c-lead.link/45jv34. • 5 октября — тренинг «Практик OKR»: https://c-lead.link/4j3ehc.…

❤2🔥2🤣1🤩1🤪1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC182 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

📊 Чек-лист экстренной проверки OKR: не пора ли делать Pivot? Мы перешагнули экватор квартала. Это идеальный момент, чтобы провести калибровку и честно ответить себе: ваши OKR всё ещё драйвят команду или превратились в «зависший груз»? Заберите 4 вопроса для проведения Mid-Quarter Check-in: ❓ 1. Актуален ли еще Objective? Если стратегия бизнеса сместилась за последние недели, продолжать бежать к старой цели ради «…

🔥2⚡1❤1👍1👏1💯1🤩1🆒1

5 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC211 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

#okr #okr_russia #memes #мемы #юмор OKR Russia: Telegram | MAX | Сетка.

👍2🔥2👏1🤣1🤩1🤪1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC280 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

📖 В эпоху ИИ создавать фичи стало проще и быстрее. Но приносят ли они реальный бизнес-эффект? В новых реалиях выигрывают компании, которые управляют ценностью, а не объемом написанного кода. В своей новой статье Разработка продуктов c ориентацией на бизнес-эффект — AI-Native SAFe® Алексей Сохин разбирает, как фреймворк AI-Native SAFe® помогает перестроить разработку с фокусом на измеримый эффект для бизнеса. #okr #…

👍3🔥3⚡1❤1🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC314 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

📖 В статье Светланы Берендеевой Бизнес-эффекты портфеля и инвестиционная стратегия — AI-Native SAFe® читайте, как связать стратегию с реальными изменениями для клиентов и бизнеса — руководство AI-Native SAFe® (Scaled Agile Framework®). #okr #okr_russia #ai #safe #ainativesafe #articles #статьи OKR Russia: Telegram | MAX | Сетка.

🤩2❤1👏1💯1🔥1🤝1🙏1

31 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC429 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Video

👍2❤1👏1🤣1🤩1🤪1😁1

30 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC382 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Цели и ключевые результаты (Objectives and Key Results, OKR) — это методика совместной работы для постановки четких целей и измеримых результатов. В статье Александра Остроухова Цели и ключевые результаты — OKR в SAFe® описываются возможности применения OKR в крупной организации в рамках фреймворка SAFe® (Scaled Agile Framework®). Вольный перевод статьи «OKRs — Scaled Agile Framework». #okr #safe #articles #статьи…

🔥5❤1👍1👏1💯1🤩1🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC361 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

#okr #okr_russia #memes #мемы #юмор OKR Russia: Telegram | MAX | Сетка.

❤3🤩2🔥1🤣1🤪1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC364 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

🎉Друзья! Мы рады представить вам подборку самых интересных и полезных статей, мемов и видео про Objectives and Key Results за 2 квартал 2026 года: Дайджест OKR Russia — Q2-2026 — не пропусти ни одного полезного материала про OKR! #okr #okr_russia #дайджест OKR Russia: Telegram | MAX | Сетка.

🔥3❤2⚡1🏆1🤩1🙏1

27 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC358 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Итоги Кейса № 5. Великий соблазн 💵 Правильный ответ: Б — Категорически против. Это убьет доверие и заставит команды занижать цели ради бонусов. Почему именно так? Это, пожалуй, главная аксиома методологии: OKR должны быть отделены от прямой финансовой мотивации. Как только вы говорите сотруднику: «Если выполнишь OKR на 100%, получишь премию», вы мгновенно уничтожаете культуру экспериментов. Никто больше не постав…

🔥3⚡1❤1👏1🤝1🤩1🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC380 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Video

👏3👍1🤣1🤪1😁1

23 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC417 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

💵 Последний вопрос. Великий соблазн Кейс: Финдиректор предлагает: «Давайте свяжем премию продуктовой команды с процентом выполнения их OKR — так они будут работать еще лучше!». Ваша реакция как OKR-эксперта? А) Отличная идея, так делают все современные компании. Б) Категорически против. Это убьет доверие, заставит команды скрывать проблемы и занижать цели ради бонусов. В) Можно, но только если бонус выплачивается…

🔥3👌1👏1🤝1🤩1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @okr_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Гибкое госуправление
@GosAgile · 4281 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Гибкое госуправление
@GosAgile · 4281 post Shtab.app
@shtabnews · 1951 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OKR Russia” (@okr_ru), 2,968 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okr_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.