Channel
@old_fashioned_channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
151subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001625621011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @old_fashioned_channel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/old_fashioned_channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 151 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 152 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 54 | 46.2% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 16.2% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 6.84% | |
| 😨 | 8 | 6.84% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 4.27% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Поведение $NDX разворотное, но обороты пока не сказать, что уверенно подтверждают. *** В целом, глубина этой коррекции - такой же неожиданный подарок, как и в июле 2024. И обстановка похожая: низколиквидное лето накануне выборов.
🍌2👍2🌚1💯1😢1
Рисковые медведи, но $SPX вообще сдвинуть не могут. Последние пару раз, когда $NDX входил в зону ниже -10-12% ATH, следовало многомесячное ралли на 25-30%. Пока принципиально AI сюжет на рынке не поменялся, разве что выборы скоро, и нового главу FOMC надо испытать. BTFD
👍3🔥2😭2
Уже конец июля, 2027-ой год считай. Рынок прайсит 2029-2030 по идее, а у нас $NVDA дают по $196
👍3😨1
Красивый день сегодня по $NDX . Высоки шансы, что это был low квартала.
👍3🥴1😢1
В последний день квартала догрузился $NDX, пора ему продолжать движение. $NVDA лонг через опционы, постоянно роллируется. Сейчас растет под отчеты своих расточительных клиентов, пока все как обычно. $MU зафиксировал ниже $1000, понаблюдаю. Под отчет взята $META , imo Марк полезет со своим AI продуктом в общую гонку. Еще интересно встал $NFLX, пытается развернуться на оборотах. Из небольших лонгов еще есть $SOFI $PWR,…
🔥4😢1
Хороший квартал. P/L +37-50%, на уровне ковидных результатов. В основном индекс, плюс опционы в $NVDA дважды по x9, плюс $MU +195% на акции. 😎 Рынок меняется. Впервые за 10 лет, простая тактика "покупать MAG7 на откатах" может перестать работать. Или нет?
🔥9❤1😁1😢1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4😭2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1😱1
Еще один пошел. "Humanoid robotics company Agility Robotics is going public through a merger with Churchill Capital Corp XI $CCXI." Рынок SPAC вполне живой, и реагирует на объявления о сделках позитивно. $AEXA ждет своего часа в портфеле, в своем нынешнем положении Chamath должен вывести на рынок какого-нибудь монстра.🤞
👍2🤯1
$MU какой-то идеальный кейс рисует. Постоянное ускорение, равнодушие к индексу, рост *до* отчета. А там CEO любит занижать гайданс = скорее всего, рост и *после* отчета.
👍3😨3😱1
Новый глава FOMC говорит языком Маска - “first principles”. Это само по себе bullish👊
👍6❤1🌚1😢1
Порядок целей на бычьем рынке: 1. Индекс. 2. Лидеры внутри движения. 3. Шортокрыл. На место п.3 многие заработавшие на движении (равно как опоздавшие), начинают подкупать отстающие бумаги. Это выглядит логично, но работает плохо - если акция плохо растет даже на бычьем рынке, лучше ее и не трогать. Точно не стоит забирать на это капитал из п.2. Вместо этого надо искать тех, кто будет "вынужден" покупать растущий рын…
👍7🏆1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @old_fashioned_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Old Fashioned” (@old_fashioned_channel), 151 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/old_fashioned_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.