Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Хамитов 𓆏

Channel

Олег Хамитов 𓆏

@oleg_khamitovv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,482subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001553392653
TypeChannel
Username@oleg_khamitovv
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oleg_khamitovv

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4811,4851,48331 August 2026 — 1,481 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,481 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,482 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,484 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,485 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,484 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,482 subscribers1,48231 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 18 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,480–1,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:401,482-2
13 Sept 2026, 16:361,484-1
9 Sept 2026, 18:151,485+1
4 Sept 2026, 03:191,484+2
31 Aug 2026, 21:351,482+1
31 Aug 2026, 08:001,481no change
31 Aug 2026, 07:451,481first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

333 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29388.0%
🙏144.20%
🍓103.00%
👏92.70%
❤‍🔥30.901%
🥰30.901%
🤩10.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 333 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC600 views73 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Бактериофаги на электронном микроскопе

71🍓1🤩1

29 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC649 views59 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

47🍓9🥰3

29 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC598 views23 reactionsread 31 August 2026

НО! В оисте ребята со всего мира и чемпионат мира смотрело оч много людей и весьма активно (посреди ночи просыпались и смотрели, представляете. Я бы ни за что хах)

23

29 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC553 views17 reactionsread 31 August 2026

(Никогда не смотрел ни одной полной игры)

17

29 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC549 views19 reactionsread 31 August 2026

(Я просто шел утром в лабу и увидел это зрелище)

19

29 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC561 views21 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Потому что наш декан квантовый физик коллаборировал с их каким-то там диджитал директором

20❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC558 views23 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Сегодня оисту подарили джерси футбольного клуба Барселона с подписями всех игроков основной команды

21❤‍🔥2

28 May 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,090 views76 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Делюсь с вами тоже, чтобы все видели и понимали, что это норма. Из серии советов славянской/татарской мамы «Больно ? Значит полезно» 💀😁

53🙏14👏9

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @oleg_khamitovv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sci_Career
@sci_career · 30,335
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
StudyGrants — стажировки| стипендии| летние школы 🌍
@studygrants · 39,234
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Хамитов 𓆏” (@oleg_khamitovv), 1,482 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oleg_khamitovv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.