Channel
@oleg_komkov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001799543619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oleg_komkov |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oleg_komkov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 84 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 77 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:23 | 65 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 66 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 66 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
297 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 89 | 30.0% | |
| ❤ | 73 | 24.6% | |
| 🏆 | 48 | 16.2% | |
| 🤝 | 22 | 7.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 5.72% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 4.38% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 4.04% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 3.03% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 2.02% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.35% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 1.01% | |
| custom 5379643556979817911 | 1 | 0.337% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Психология влияния — это не дешёвые манипуляции, а глубинное понимание природы человека. Ещё Дейл Карнеги писал: для любого человека главная фигура во Вселенной — это он сам. Нам всем больше всего нравится говорить о себе, своих результатах и своих задачах. Хотите стать гениальным переговорщиком? Перестаньте забивать эфир рассказами о себе. Слушайте искренне. Задавайте правильные вопросы. Проявляйте настоящий, неи…
❤7🔥5💯4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5❤4🏆4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6❤🔥3💔3
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣5❤3😇3💔1custom 53796435569798179111
Начинайте изучать переговоры — они важны везде и всегда: в работе, бизнесе, отношениях и повседневной жизни. Умение договариваться помогает лучше понимать людей, отстаивать свои интересы и находить решения, выгодные для всех.
🔥7❤3🤝3
Хочу выразить благодарность Диме Киму (@kima_dima) за то, что он просто есть. Это Человек с большой буквы. Настоящий, который никого из себя не строит и всегда остается самим собой. Восхищаюсь им и от всей души поддерживаю его путь. У него мощная и красивая миссия — помогать людям познавать себя. Через его личную трансформацию и опыт ты начинаешь смотреть на свою жизнь совсем под другим углом и учишься по-настоящем…
🔥10❤🔥6❤3
😂
🔥7😁6❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣8❤7💯3🤝3
В 2026 году у всех плюс-минус одинаковый продукт, одинаковые цены и одинаковые условия. Чем побеждать конкурентов? Ответ один — СЕРВИС. Сегодня клиент выбирает не товар. Клиент выбирает отношение и комфорт. И совершенно неважно, с кем вы работаете: с физлицами, крупным бизнесом или бюджетными организациями. Везде решения принимают люди. Если вы хотите продавать больше и сохранять клиентов годами — сервис должен ст…
🔥8🏆3🤝3
Кому-то нужна мотивация, чтобы ходить на работу ?
🔥9❤5🏆5
Video message, posted without a caption
🏆7💯5❤4
Записали с сестрой душевный выпуск подкаста — поговорили откровенно и затронули важные жизненные темы. Получился очень тёплый и искренний разговор ❤️ ▶️ смотреть 📹 смотреть Обязательно подписывайтесь на её канал — там красиво, вдохновляюrще и очень спортивно! 🏋️♀️✨ @lovelenau15
❤🔥8❤5🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @oleg_komkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐎𝐥𝐞𝐠 𝐊𝐨𝐦𝐤𝐨𝐯 | 𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐌𝐄” (@oleg_komkov), 84 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oleg_komkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.