Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [Рест] Будни олежа киннов

Channel

[Рест] Будни олежа киннов

@olegkinni

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

265subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003453115146
TypeChannel
Username@olegkinni
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olegkinni

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

263270266.57 August 2026 — 270 subscribers8 August 2026 — 270 subscribers14 August 2026 — 265 subscribers29 August 2026 — 263 subscribers5 September 2026 — 267 subscribers12 September 2026 — 265 subscribers2657 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262–271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 16:36265-2
5 Sept 2026, 00:41267+4
29 Aug 2026, 03:24263-2
14 Aug 2026, 23:47265-5
8 Aug 2026, 08:49270no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:37270first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

499 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 625368276765403204518236.5%
custom 528766072489249957210320.6%
custom 61835891118367097917314.6%
custom 5265179019229302334469.22%
🕊377.41%
custom 6262360641701417777306.01%
custom 5305595675096931345142.81%
custom 5294204915021799557122.40%
custom 625802775843412856920.401%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 499 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔡Скоро все будет,у меня как раз выходные🌟

custom 52876607248924995724

28 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC159 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦷 🤩🟥🟧🤩🤩🔤а, я кинню Олежу и то что я боюсь резких движений, не означает что меня били в детстве🤩🦷🤩 🟥🟧 🤩Будни Олежа киннов 🌟 🤩🟥🟧

custom 625368276765403204519custom 52876607248924995724custom 52651790192293023343custom 61835891118367097912

28 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC144 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Делать вечный набор в админы?

  1. Да69%
  2. Нет38%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 53055956750969313453

28 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC177 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦷 🤩🟥🟧🤩🤩🔤а, я кинню Олежу и тревожность кажется... будет преследовать меня даже после смерти🤩🦷🤩 🟥🟧 🤩Будни Олежа киннов 🌟 🤩🟥🟧

custom 625368276765403204514🕊5custom 62623606417014177774

28 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC146 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦷 🤩🟥🟧🤩🤩🔤а, я кинню Олежу и у меня есть привычка которую я делаю сам того не замечая🤩🦷🤩 🟥🟧 🤩Будни Олежа киннов 🌟 🤩🟥🟧

custom 625368276765403204512custom 61835891118367097913custom 62623606417014177773custom 62580277584341285691

28 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Надеюсь сделать вам до августа побольше постов хотя бы заготовки, потому что в августе времени не будет, потому что выхожу на работу..🟥🟧

custom 52942049150217995578

28 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC154 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦷 🤩🟥🟧🤩🤩🔤а, я кинню Олежу и в игре можно сделать все что хочешь и заранее знать все события, жаль в жизни все не так...🤩🦷🤩 🟥🟧 🤩Будни Олежа киннов 🌟 🤩🟥🟧

custom 625368276765403204516custom 52876607248924995727custom 61835891118367097915custom 53055956750969313452

25 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC213 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦷 🤩🟥🟧🤩🤩🔤а, я кинню Олежу и я не могу все рассказать даже самому близкому другу, не потому что не доверяю, а потому что это больная для меня тема 🤩🦷🤩 🟥🟧 🤩Будни Олежа киннов 🌟 Будни Дима киннов 🤩🟥🟧

custom 625368276765403204522custom 618358911183670979112custom 52876607248924995726custom 53055956750969313453custom 62623606417014177773

25 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC160 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

67..... Простите

custom 618358911183670979112custom 52651790192293023343custom 53055956750969313452

19 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC263 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀читаю, что нет ничего лучше, чем проводить время с теми, кто тебе действительно близок. 😊 🤩Будни Олежа киннов

custom 625368276765403204515🕊8custom 62623606417014177774custom 53055956750969313451

19 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC241 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀еужели так трудно хоть иногда прислушаться к моему мнению и желаниям? 😊🤩Будни Олежа киннов

custom 625368276765403204515custom 52651790192293023343custom 61835891118367097912custom 52876607248924995721

18 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC215 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎀🤩🔤лежа кинни, желает спокойной ночи всем кроме тех, у кого🤩. . . 🎁🤩🤩🌟сть симс,или любая другая игра для "девочек" 😊 😆 — 🔠ду спать😏 😥 — 🔠егодня без сна. . .😫

custom 526517901922930233426custom 528766072489249957215custom 62580277584341285691

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @olegkinni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTCFinal Results13 voters

Делать вечный набор в админы?

  1. Да69%
  2. Нет38%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[Рест] Будни олежа киннов” (@olegkinni), 265 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegkinni.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.