27 measurements spanning 30 days, net +2,660. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,996–24,454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 02:58
24,055
+12
4 Sept 2026, 13:58
24,043
+43
3 Sept 2026, 04:14
24,000
+30
2 Sept 2026, 03:24
23,970
+20
1 Sept 2026, 00:28
23,950
+49
30 Aug 2026, 21:44
23,901
+57
30 Aug 2026, 00:15
23,844
+43
28 Aug 2026, 21:06
23,801
+29
27 Aug 2026, 21:08
23,772
+42
26 Aug 2026, 18:14
23,730
+56
25 Aug 2026, 15:37
23,674
+32
24 Aug 2026, 13:43
23,642
+89
22 Aug 2026, 19:12
23,553
+84
21 Aug 2026, 11:18
23,469
+58
20 Aug 2026, 10:57
23,411
+132
19 Aug 2026, 11:35
23,279
+37
18 Aug 2026, 10:33
23,242
+49
17 Aug 2026, 12:47
23,193
+25
16 Aug 2026, 06:48
23,168
+91
14 Aug 2026, 17:47
23,077
first reading
Engagement
211 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.62%
avg views ÷ 24,055 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
163 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
163
of 211 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
211 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
220,233
Reactions total
4,090
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 32s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,099 reactions across 209 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,735
34.0%
🔥
1,229
24.1%
👍
673
13.2%
💋
345
6.77%
🙉
252
4.94%
🥰
143
2.80%
💘
127
2.49%
😁
75
1.47%
👀
73
1.43%
💯
61
1.20%
❤🔥
49
0.961%
👌
48
0.941%
😍
42
0.824%
😱
40
0.784%
🤔
32
0.628%
🤯
30
0.588%
😢
27
0.53%
🤣
22
0.431%
👏
19
0.373%
🏆
16
0.314%
17 further kinds
61
1.20%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 209 of the 211 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,099 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Детство заканчивается тогда, когда математика в школе делится на алгебру, геометрию и теорию вероятностей 😉 Это, конечно, шутка, но в ней есть доля правды.
Алгебра очень любит порядок. А вы?
Самый первый порядок мы наведем в числах. Ловите полезные карточки, которые пригодятся и 7-классникам, и 8-классникам!
🔔 Сегодня в 19:00 мск я проведу открытый вебинар по первой теме 7 класса — «Рациональные числа».
🔗 РЕГИСТР…
А КТО СКАЗАЛ, ЧТО 1 СЕНТЯБРЯ ЛЕТО ЗАКОНЧИЛОСЬ? ☀️
Мы с преподавателями 100Б попросили оставить для вас летние цены ещё на несколько дней — нам действительно выделили 500 мест!
На сайте цены уже выросли, но для вас всё ещё можно получить скидку по промокодам:
💯 ЛЕТО — скидка ~1000₽ при записи ко мне на занятия сентября
💯 ЛЕТО2 — скидка 30%, если берёте сразу несколько курсов для 6–8 классов. Например, математику + р…
Друзья мои, с геометрией размялись. А теперь у меня для вас классная новость! 🎉
Завтра я проведу открытый вебинар по самой первой теме алгебры 7 класса — «Рациональные числа».
И это уже не вебинар Летней школы. Здесь моя задача — помочь спокойно адаптироваться к учёбе в сентябре, разобраться с первой новой темой и уверенно войти в учебный год. Приглашаю учеников и их родителей!
🗓 Встречаемся 3 сентября в 19:00 МСК…
Сколько правильных ответов? 😉
🔥 — все три!
❤️ — один-два верных
😁 — все мимо
Смело отмечайтесь, здесь все свои!
А если нужен разбор, напишите в комментариях 💯
Ну что, признавайтесь, кто пошел в 7 класс? 👋
Сейчас у вас очень интересный период — начинается новый предмет, геометрия. 📐
И если поначалу все будет понятно — вот треугольник, один такой красивый, с ним и работаем, решаем задачу, — то потом вам в одной картинке будут шифровать по несколько фигур сразу. И задачи сразу станут сложнее! Наши глаза видят только один большой треугольник или квадрат, а на маленькие части…
ЗАПИСЬ ВЕБИНАРА 📹
«Как знать математику на 4 и 5. Советы от учителей»
👉🏼 по ссылке в ВКвидео
Если после занятия вы поняли, что хотите учить математику с нами, присоединяйтесь к годовому курсу до старта занятий!
Жмите на ссылку, если:
- нужна помощь менеджера
- хотите сразу забрать курс
🚨 Осталось всего 10 минут и мы начинаем!
Заходите на эфир! 👇
КАК ЗНАТЬ МАТЕМАТИКУ НА 4 и 5
Мы уже там! А вы? 😉
👍7👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 211 posts we hold for @olga_simple_math. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@olga_simple_math edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 46 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ТЕОРИЯ ВЕРОЯТНОСТЕЙ
В коробке лежат 8 красных, 5 синих и 7 зелёных шаров. Наугад вынимают один шар. Какова вероятность того, что этот шар окажется НЕ синим?
0,2518%
0,7567%
0,357%
0,49%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ТРЕУГОЛЬНИКИ
В равнобедренном треугольнике ABC с основанием AC угол при вершине B равен 80°. Проведена биссектриса AD. Найдите градусную меру угла ADC.
105°48%
75°15%
50°11%
25°25%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬНЫЕ ПРЯМЫЕ
При пересечении двух параллельных прямых секущей один из односторонних углов в 3 раза больше другого. Найдите меньший из этих углов.
45°70%
135°9%
30°7%
60°14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
В прямоугольном треугольнике гипотенуза равна 14 см, а один из острых углов — 60°. Чему равна длина меньшего катета?
14 см6%
10 см5%
3,5 см7%
7 см81%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Понятная математика с Ольгой | 7-8 класс |100балльный” (@olga_simple_math), 24,055 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olga_simple_math.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.