Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 2D арт-лид | Ольга Дребас

Channel

2D арт-лид | Ольга Дребас

@olgadrebas_art

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,195subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611178722
TypeChannel
Username@olgadrebas_art
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olgadrebas_art

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1901,1951,192.58 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,190 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,192 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,195 subscribers8 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 35 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,189–1,196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 10:171,195+2
27 Aug 2026, 18:561,193+2
25 Aug 2026, 02:051,191-1
21 Aug 2026, 21:071,192+2
18 Aug 2026, 10:041,190-1
8 Aug 2026, 17:441,191no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:451,191first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,112 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤36632.9%
🔥34430.9%
🤣1089.71%
😁1029.17%
💯857.64%
👀322.88%
😭252.25%
🎉232.07%
🌚80.719%
😢70.629%
💅50.45%
👍30.27%
🙈20.18%
😨10.09%
🤪10.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC328 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#арт_мемошная

❤29💯23😁4🔥3🤪1

7 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC372 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рабочий созвон, край зоны обзора камеры чуть пониже моего подбородка. В это же время ниже, у меня на руках лялька: #мамство

🤣31😁15❤5👍1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC479 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отрадно видеть, когда художники запускают свои личные продукты и обучение без "прокладки" в виде школочки, как например все те, кого когда-то собрала Катя в свой пост (Кать, где твое менторство? Пора уже) Вот и Элина теперь среди работающих профи, у кого запросто и без посредников можно поучиться, она запускает воркшоп по живописи. Кто пойдет, похвастайтесь потом работами :* #препское #полезности

❤18🔥7

4 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC552 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

❓Опрос 2 А сколько 3д художников меня читает?

  1. Я работаю в 2д (любое направление)70%
  2. Я 3д моделлер/скульптор18%
  3. Я делаю еще что-то (в коменты)12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👀9

4 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC562 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❓Опрос Есть ли темы, о которых я НЕ пишу регулярно, но вы бы хотели узнать? (Список нынешних рубрик блога тут). Может быть какие-то темы, которые могли бы стать еще рубрикой, серией постов? Для одиночных вопросов есть предложка 📨

👀14

3 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC859 views79 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Московский судья дал прецедент. Вор у вора украл — и тот пошел в суд, а там хоба и расписали по пунктам что к чему. Определение суда можно скачать и прочитать в разделе "документы" на страничке дела , там прекрасные формулировки. За ссылку на дело спасибо Максу #noAI

🔥61❤13🌚5

31 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC782 views104 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Старые-новые выводы первых месяцев жизни с сыном... для художников 1️⃣То, что очень хочешь, может прийти когда уже не ждешь и даже не надеешься, внезапно (беременность, предложение работы мечты) 2️⃣Для всего надо создать условия: для рождения ребенка нужно подготовить дом, для сна малыша надо подготовить комнату и ритуал перехода ко сну. Для рисования и других дел так же. Если есть что-то, что хочется делать, подго…

❤67🔥19💯11🤣7

31 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC653 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Круговорот подписок среди коллег сначала ты подписываешься и коментишь/репостишь, но тебя игнорят отписываешься живешь жизнь и чего-то достигаешь на тебя подписываются игнорировавшие ранее отписываются, когда не даешь взаимную подписку пару лет спустя подписываются все равно, чтоб читать 😂 #жизнь

🤣40😁15💯8🙈2

30 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC824 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как-то незаметно подкрался год, как я опять в Драгонфлае. #рабочее

🔥36❤16🎉12

28 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC807 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Из коментов, выношу дополнение для всех, кто просит у кого-то фидбэк по какому-то поводу

🔥36💯13

28 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC841 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Про фидбэки Скрин от Аллы, спасибо ей за теплый фидбэк теперь уже мне! Также мои фиды: Недавно в личку написала одна знакомая коллега из широкого круга блогов и чатов, попросила совета насчет поиска работы. Я посмотрела ее портфолио и коротенько и честно написала как есть. Увы, душеспасительного "все будет хорошо и у вас все отлично" я не могла сказать. Придется крутиться и возможно расширять список услуг, чтобы ос…

🔥33❤14😭10🤣3👍2

3 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 8 August 2026

❓ Опрос, вдохновленный соседним пабликом, вы когда-нибудь находили работу через linkedin? Вообще кому-то он принес толк? Я открываю ленту там и тоска берет, все жалуются на работодателей, или делают авто-посты по шаблону "ищу работу" без доп вводных, без картинок и тд. #арт_HR

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @olgadrebas_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTCAnonymous Poll262 voters

❓Опрос 2 А сколько 3д художников меня читает?

  1. Я работаю в 2д (любое направление)70%
  2. Я 3д моделлер/скульптор18%
  3. Я делаю еще что-то (в коменты)12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTCFinal Results122 voters

Линкедин: чо как у вас с ним

  1. кринж, мне не помогло ни разу61%
  2. пару раз выстрелило, фифти-фифти30%
  3. активно сижу там и имею существенный полезный выхлоп11%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“2D арт-лид | Ольга Дребас” (@olgadrebas_art), 1,195 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgadrebas_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.