Channel
@olgagamalina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
363subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001779387189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olgagamalina |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olgagamalina |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 363 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 364 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 361 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 356 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 357 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 357 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
143 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 112 | 78.3% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 9.79% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 9.09% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Большая иллюзия касается романтизации профессии психолога, если бы вы знали, как на самом деле выглядит процесс терапии... многие ли сознательно готовы каждый день встречаться с человеческой болью и не искать способа как можно быстрее её уменьшить? Потому что именно в этом месте желание "помогать" впервые сталкивается с реальностью профессии, желание "помогать", пожалуй, основопологающая потребность при входе в профе…
❤9
Пожалуй, одна из самых болезненных вещей в отношениях-это неопределенность💔 Человеку очень трудно быть там, где нет ясности, он начинает искать эту ясность разными способами, он хочет чувствовать, какое место занимает в жизни любимого человека,выискивать эту ясность бывает очень утомительно Само по себе наличие любви, конечно, не избавляет нас от неопределенности и сомнений, но хочется, чтобы любовь была такой, где …
❤10💔2👍1
Терапевтическая группа онлайн 🪽 Хотела сделать анонс в августе, но обещала не бронировать ни за кем место в группе, пока не объявлю анонс, чтобы все желающие имели возможность попасть в группу Немного о формате… У меня были уже группы живого присутствия и я очень долго откладывала группу онлайн, потому что сама не имела опыта онлайн работы в группе и не чувствовала, как можно оформить групповой процесс в такой форм…
❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Выпуск детский сад \ выпуск 9 класс🪽
🥰13❤5
Video, posted without a caption
❤5
Фильмы, песни, книги романтизируют понятие любви, показывая нам яркое чувство как растворение друг в друге, стремление к симбиозу, что понятно…это, пожалуй, самое желанное чувство, когда мы являемся единым целым с нашей мамой В самом раннем детстве ребенок проживает опыт полного единства, он не ощущает себя отдельным, мир не разделен на «я» и «не я» и поэтому идея полного слияния нам так притягательна(особенно у тех…
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Лицей искусств✅ Лучшее мое решение 9 лет назад🤍
❤23
Если вы на пороге изменений или чувствуете, что они необходимы, вам послание❤️🩹 Выбирайте: 1,2 или 3
❤13👍1
Я любитель реалити шоу, мне нравится формат, где ты становишься свидетелем того, как разные люди выбирают строить отношения, как с точки зрения социометрии(метод исследования межличностных отношений в группе) кто какую роль в группе занимает, как меняются эти роли и что на это влияет Вообщем, для меня это поле для научного эксперимента 😀 Одно из последние реалити, за которым мне интересно наблюдать «ставка на любовь…
❤10
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @olgagamalina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Olga Gamalina” (@olgagamalina), 363 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgagamalina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.