Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПроЖизнь_olgamarshakova_

Channel

ПроЖизнь_olgamarshakova_

@olgamarshakova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

305subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001691783968
TypeChannel
Username@olgamarshakova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olgamarshakova

Growth

3033053047 August 2026 — 303 subscribers8 August 2026 — 303 subscribers14 August 2026 — 304 subscribers20 August 2026 — 305 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 13 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 303–305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 18:38305+1
14 Aug 2026, 19:17304+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:00303no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:11303first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 36s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

236 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14762.3%
🔥5925.0%
🙏93.81%
👍72.97%
😍62.54%
🥰31.27%
💯20.847%
😁20.847%
👌10.424%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Иногда мы понимаем, что не хотим соглашаться, но всё равно отвечаем: «Хорошо, я сделаю». Почему так происходит? Мы можем бояться: — что человек расстроится или будет плохо о нас думать; — показаться эгоистичными или «неудобными»; — столкнуться с конфликтом или критикой; — потерять любовь, поддержку или одобрение; — почувствовать вину за то, что выбираем свои интересы. Часто за этим стоят привычные установки: «надо

3🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC77 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Уже в Москве, уже работаю 2 дня, а Балтика не отпускает...

🔥10😍6

5 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC82 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как понять, где проходят ваши личные границы? Есть простой ориентир: прислушайтесь к своим чувствам. Если после разговора или просьбы вы испытываете раздражение, обиду, вину, ощущение, что вами воспользовались или заставили сделать то, чего не хотелось, — возможно, ваши личные границы были нарушены. Задайте себе три вопроса: 🟡Я действительно этого хотел(а)? 🟡 Мог(ла) ли я спокойно отказаться? 🟡Чувствую ли я уважен

🙏4🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC102 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Зеленоградск, город кошек и красивых домиков

9🔥7👍2💯1

3 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем доброго утра! Напоминаю, что понедельничная карточка уже ждёт вас в ВК https://vk.ru/psiholog_rasstanovki_marshakova А я жду вас завтра на расстановках! ❤️😊

5

1 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC114 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Говоря «да» другим, важно не говорить «нет» себе. Приглашаю на встречу «Как научиться говорить “нет" и отстаивать свои границы». 🗓 11 августа (вт) 🕓 в 19.30 💻Яндекс-Телемост Умение говорить «нет» — это не про грубость и эгоизм. Это про уважение к себе, своим ресурсам, времени, желаниям и внутренним принципам. Иногда мы соглашаемся на просьбы из страха обидеть, разочаровать или вызвать конфликт, а потом чувствуем у

6🙏2👌1

30 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC125 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Притча о старом дворе Пришел ученик к мудрецу и жалуется:— Устал я. Все кому не лень заходят в мою жизнь, берут мое время, портят настроение. Не умею я говорить «нет». Мудрец ответил вопросом:— Скажи, ученик, почему твой забор вокруг дома такой ветхий?— Забор вот-вот рухнет, — вздохнул тот.— Именно. Когда забор слабый, никто не спрашивает разрешения войти. Люди идут туда, куда им удобно. Но если забор прочен, ворота

8💯1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC108 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Балтийское небо... Можно смотреть бесконечно! Вчера опять был сногсшибательный (в прямом смысле) ветер, телефон плясал в руках 😁

16🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC127 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

12🔥6👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @olgamarshakova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рецепты на каждый день | Готовка
@everyday_web · 37,172
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
Рецепты: 🍪 Выпечка | Десерты | Салаты
@recepty_vypechka · 31,800
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПроЖизнь_olgamarshakova_” (@olgamarshakova), 305 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgamarshakova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.