Channel
@oli_is_doing_fine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001853513124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oli_is_doing_fine |
| Created | 15 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oli_is_doing_fine |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 142 | +7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 135 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 133 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 129 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 127 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 127 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
341 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5467898490598217453 | 75 | 22.0% | |
| custom 5307717101178364338 | 41 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5436372859414934031 | 36 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5467835496312887311 | 35 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5370944461499046025 | 29 | 8.50% | |
| custom 5474420557350994214 | 29 | 8.50% | |
| custom 5204166448989115856 | 26 | 7.62% | |
| custom 5474538376893859855 | 26 | 7.62% | |
| custom 5204086257654729421 | 22 | 6.45% | |
| custom 5436393917639586134 | 22 | 6.45% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
блииин как здорово что я могу рисовать иллюстрации к фикам что я сам же и написал 🌚 захотелось чего-то летнего несерьезного # пляжный эпизод (буквально) ссылка на фб // ссылка на ао3
custom 546783549631288731135
афигеть чат спасибо вам большое за 100 падпищеков и за все приятности в комментариях 🥹 очень рад что картинки с нишевым руреп яой пейрингом кому-то нужны так же как и мне
custom 546789849059821745329
никак не отлипнут друг от друга #фаллелин
custom 546789849059821745346
психня любимая #фаллелин
custom 530771710117836433841
File, posted without a caption
класть на признание болт, слать дизреспекты гордыне — выйдет из этого толк! нам похуй, мы с ваней иные
custom 543637285941493403136
накопилось скетчей #фаллелин
custom 547442055735099421429
File, posted without a caption
🤐🤐🤐
custom 547453837689385985526
за их потоком сознания иногда невозможно угнаться но они кажется прекрасно понимают друг друга #фаллелин
custom 520416644898911585626
i don't even caaaaaare anymore #фаллелин
custom 537094446149904602529
федор
custom 543639391763958613422
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @oli_is_doing_fine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ISDOINGFINE” (@oli_is_doing_fine), 142 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oli_is_doing_fine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.