Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Oliver Trader | VIP GROUP

Channel

Oliver Trader | VIP GROUP

@oli_trd

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

32,485subscribers

-3,275 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002295161872
TypeChannel
Username@oli_trd
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held12
On Telegramt.me/oli_trd

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@oli_trd was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@paul_copytrade
held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026

Growth

32,48535,76034,122.57 August 2026 — 35,760 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,760 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,730 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,661 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,601 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,471 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,391 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,334 subscribers15 August 2026 — 35,285 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,207 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,122 subscribers8 October 2026 — 32,485 subscribers7 August 20268 October 2026
12 measurements spanning 61 days, net -3,275. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,994–36,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 00:2232,485-2,637
17 Aug 2026, 19:1735,122-85
16 Aug 2026, 14:4635,207-78
15 Aug 2026, 01:0935,285-49
13 Aug 2026, 17:5835,334-57
12 Aug 2026, 13:2435,391-80
11 Aug 2026, 12:5835,471-130
10 Aug 2026, 10:3335,601-60
9 Aug 2026, 08:4135,661-69
8 Aug 2026, 07:5735,730-30
7 Aug 2026, 18:1535,760no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:0635,760first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 32,485 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,560
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held27 (6 May 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total31,901
Reactions total4,933
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
36
Videos
2
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,135 reactions across 24 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,56021.9%
👍1,54421.6%
🎉1,45520.4%
❤1,29218.1%
👏1,21617.0%
💯570.799%
🥰40.056%
⚡20.028%
🏆20.028%
👌20.028%
🐳10.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 17:32 UTC≈5,220 views499 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

↗️ Select Pair: ETH OTC 🔹

👍108❤104🔥104👏95🎉88

7 Oct 2026, 17:03 UTC≈8,360 views1,494 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🎓FINISHED THE TRADING SESSION IN THE VIP CHANNEL 🔵 Result: 3/3 signals hit - 1,104$ profit If you want to see more profitable trades, I give the strongest signals personally. That’s where the real results are 100% 🔗 Curious? Write me in DM - @olivercryptoz

🎉323🔥316👏297❤290👍268

1 Oct 2026, 00:28 UTC≈8,980 views1,472 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

Guys, here’s my result for the day – I made over $150,000 today 🤯 That’s an all-time personal record for me – all the numbers are in the screenshot Tomorrow I’m trading this signal again, but with more capital – after today’s result, I’m even more confident in this setup It’s the best setup we’ve found, and the limits finally let us trade with bigger positions Don’t miss it

👍316🔥311❤304👏291🎉250

1 Oct 2026, 00:16 UTC≈8,660 views1,468 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

❤️ Thanks for your reviews!

👏328❤317🔥289👍284🎉250

11 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC≈14,200 views133 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

HYPE - continuing to drop 🔥🔥 Locked in another 25% of the position and tightened the stop in entry! 🔥📉

👍37🔥36🎉31❤17👏12

10 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈13,200 views113 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🧑‍💻 Here are the top 10 privacy-focused crypto projects by development activity. The directional indicators show how each project's ranking has changed since the previous update: 1) Chainlink ($LINK) 🥇 2) Zama ($ZAMA) 🥈 3) Aztec Network ($AZTEC) 🥉 4) Dash ($DASH) 5) Zcash ($ZEC) 6) HOPR ($HOPR) 7) Nym ($NYM) 8) Dusk ($DUSK) 9) Monero ($XMR) 10) Firo ($FIRO) Development never sleeps. Which privacy project are you w…

👍36🔥28❤15🎉15👏13⚡2🏆2💯2

10 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC≈12,300 views107 reactionsread 8 October 2026

#GRAM #TON 🇪🇺 Pavel Durov compared the EU to a “banana republic” following the adoption of the Chat Control law. According to critics, Chat Control could allow authorities to scan users’ private messages, emails, and photos without a court warrant, under the pretext of combating illegal content.

🎉29🔥29👍22❤18👏9

10 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC≈12,100 views107 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

HYPE SHORT 🕯 Entry: 67.603 – 72.428 Targets: 65.789 / 64.522 / 61.684 Stop Loss: 75.230 On the chart, we can see that price swept the BSL liquidity, tested the imbalance, and then produced a change of character (CHoCH). We’re now looking for price to interact with liquidity inside the IMB before continuing the bearish move toward SSL liquidity.

🔥30🎉28👍23👏16❤8🥰2

10 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC≈11,300 views80 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

ETH From a long perspective, ETH is looking stronger than Bitcoin here. After sweeping the lows, we can continue looking for opportunities based on the current market structure. 👀📈

👍21🎉19🔥16❤12👏12

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @oli_trd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@oli_trd edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 October 2026
Most recent edit
8 October 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oliver Trader | VIP GROUP” (@oli_trd), 32,485 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oli_trd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.