Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ololade Ayomide

Channel

Ololade Ayomide

@ololade

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

169subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002450117396
TypeChannel
Usernames@ayomide @ololade
Created6 November 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ololade

Growth

1692031867 August 2026 — 203 subscribers8 August 2026 — 203 subscribers15 August 2026 — 189 subscribers15 August 2026 — 189 subscribers16 August 2026 — 188 subscribers16 August 2026 — 188 subscribers24 August 2026 — 170 subscribers25 August 2026 — 169 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 17 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 01:37169-1
24 Aug 2026, 11:17170-18
16 Aug 2026, 17:05188no change
16 Aug 2026, 03:05188-1
15 Aug 2026, 07:00189no change
15 Aug 2026, 06:53189-14
8 Aug 2026, 11:19203no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:10203first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 6 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53187833592943824992218.6%
custom 58907469887811161761916.1%
1916.1%
custom 54428286247575365331512.7%
👍1311.0%
custom 5438606753509957469108.47%
custom 532123165815683000186.78%
🤣86.78%
👨‍💻21.69%
🙏21.69%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2024 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 10 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ololade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2024 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jun 2026, 20:19 UTC994 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

"It’s a Financial Mistake" ~ My team when I acquired 🧽@WashaX. Pragmatically, it didn’t fit in the Group’s vision until proper tech was rigorously implemented into the "local business", as they concluded. "This is a Global brand, the Group’s vision remains solving problems using technological solutions. No misalignment detected as far as I’m concerned" ~ CTO Since my CTO agreed for the first time in a blue moon, I

custom 5438606753509957469103

27 May 2026, 15:51 UTC365 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

If I CAN, You Can TOO. 🤝🤝 This is not an advert, don’t be autistic!

custom 544282862475753653373

27 May 2026, 15:41 UTC363 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

I used to be autistic… I hardly communicated with anyone, worked on my projects tirelessly, and overall, I was doing well as a nerd. After all, the projects were progressing, and the profits were increasing. However, in the last two months, I’ve received numerous calls, in-person meetings with traders, investors, financiers, and neural network experts. I missed out on so much because of my tunnel vision… niches wh

custom 544282862475753653382👨‍💻2

4 Feb 2026, 23:02 UTC642 views16 reactions7 Starsread 15 August 2026

1. no Junks 2. no drinking 3. no smoking 4. no overTrading 5. no womanizing 6. no procrastinating… That was me in 2024 🤷‍♂️ Some rules are meant to test your discipline, not necessarily to eliminate bad habits. After all, no one tells you "bad habits die when a part of you dies". You’ll figure it out when it’s too late, I promise you. Not only is experience the best teacher, it’ll kill that part of you when you le

custom 589074698878111617613custom 53187833592943824993

4 Feb 2026, 11:29 UTC544 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026

While there’s a lot to analyze from your blog post Sergei, I’ve noticed that you seem to be fixated on subconsciously infuriating Nigerians; this post proved it. You made a joke about the Nigerian currency and government in a rather insensitive way which is quoted above. Every nation has its own challenges and drawbacks. Instead of trying to provoke your audience, consider conveying your messages in a positive and i

🤣81

3 Feb 2026, 09:26 UTC391 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

@Africapitalism 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

custom 58907469887811161764custom 531878335929438249931

2 Jan 2026, 11:32 UTC460 views10 reactions6 Starsread 15 August 2026

Hello guys ♠️♠️ Due to the ban, I’ll be active here. Remember, I’ll never DM first 📌

custom 53187833592943824997custom 58907469887811161762👍1

21 Mar 2025, 10:05 UTC569 views16 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Here’s my SpadeX link. I’ll randomly select 10 profiles to fund a Lend position of $10,000 each on ♠️ SpadeX P2P Lend.

👍10custom 531878335929438249951

6 Nov 2024, 13:07 UTC≈1,400 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

New channel. I will never DM you first ‼️

custom 53212316581568300018custom 53187833592943824994👍2🙏2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ololade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 987,653 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ololade Ayomide” (@ololade), 169 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ololade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.