«Мама, ты самая красивая женщина века!» — сказал мой ребенок, пока мы гуляли по Зеленоградску 😭 Такой маленький, а уже понял, от какой прикормки дуреют мамы с нарциссической травмой 😁🫶
❤396🥰109😍75😁10😘10👍1

Channel
@olya_apetyan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55,594subscribers
+24,789 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001714364615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olya_apetyan |
| Description | Все вопросы по заказам: @glow_me_support Заказ в другую страну: @glowme_order Для связи: @sabzira12 Моя косметика: https://glowme.ru |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olya_apetyan |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 55,594 | +2,967 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 52,627 | +3,560 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 49,067 | +2,012 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 47,055 | +12,681 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 34,374 | +3,641 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 30,733 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:53 | 30,753 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:07 | 30,755 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 30,747 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 30,733 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 30,729 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 30,712 | +20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 30,692 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 30,695 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 30,703 | -21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:39 | 30,724 | +10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 30,714 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 30,711 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 30,726 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 30,734 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (31 July 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 676,250 |
| Reactions total | 35,296 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 03:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
52,601 reactions across 52 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24,449 | 46.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7,283 | 13.8% | |
| 🤩 | 5,806 | 11.0% | |
| 😁 | 3,889 | 7.39% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2,666 | 5.07% | |
| 😍 | 2,387 | 4.54% | |
| 🥰 | 1,593 | 3.03% | |
| 💅 | 1,273 | 2.42% | |
| 🙏 | 942 | 1.79% | |
| 😢 | 733 | 1.39% | |
| 😎 | 341 | 0.648% | |
| 😱 | 325 | 0.618% | |
| 👏 | 236 | 0.449% | |
| 🎉 | 219 | 0.416% | |
| 👍 | 209 | 0.397% | |
| 💯 | 174 | 0.331% | |
| 😘 | 76 | 0.144% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,601 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olya_apetyan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 15 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Мама, ты самая красивая женщина века!» — сказал мой ребенок, пока мы гуляли по Зеленоградску 😭 Такой маленький, а уже понял, от какой прикормки дуреют мамы с нарциссической травмой 😁🫶
❤396🥰109😍75😁10😘10👍1
Который день возвращаюсь к этому видео и хочу сказать, что нет ничего более сексуального, чем кайфующая, талантливая женщина, которая нашла своё место в жизни. Столько энергии в этом, что сдохнуть можно ❤️🔥 А энергия, как известно, самая дорогая волюта мира, на которую притягиваются все и всё. Желаю тем, кто ещё не оказался в этой точке, однажды туда прийти ❤️🔥 Аминь !
❤649👏118🔥107❤🔥44🙏24💯22😁8
штош! прекрасный кремушек у меня, я не знаю, поверите ли вы мне, если я скажу, что… 🔴когда только наносишь его на руки, они отчетливо пахнет синнабонкой, я прям чувствую аромат жженой карамели и выпечки, но! 🔴когда начинаешь растирать его на руках, он пахнет мокрой травой.. асфальтом, землей 🥹 первый раз ощущаю такой аромат на себе, очень необычные ощущения, будто осенний дождь, а точнее, состояние на улице после не…
❤533❤🔥148🥰74🔥13😍5
ВАКАНСИЯ: МЫ ИЩЕМ ТЕХНИЧЕСКОГО ДИРЕКТОРА ♥️ Давно у нас не было открытых вакансий на топовые позиции. Прикрепила не очень эстетичный скрин вакансии, чтобы наш запрос был максимально понятен. Если всё, что написано выше про Вас — отправляейте отклик сюда @sabzira_glowme с пометкой «технический директор». Прикрепите резюме и 2/3 примера Вашей деятельности (ссылка на сайт (другое), с описанием проделанной работы, ре…
❤322🔥76🤩39😱19❤🔥12👍10💯8
Нежно напомню, что сегодня и завтра последний день у нас на сайте действует вот этот промокод ( TOTALSLAY) на скидку 7% ♥️
❤441🔥96🤩68❤🔥32👍9💅6
НОВИНКА НА САЙТЕ GLOW ME ❤️🔥 Волнительно очень. Наш крем-баттер для рук в новой, лимитированной отдушке AUTUMN EDITION. Идею, сделать крем в осеннем аромате мы вынашивали 2 года. Но каждый раз вводя популярные отдушки на тему, мы сталкивались с сильным упрощением: как будто где-то ты это уже слышал. Было принято решение обратиться в парфюмерное бюро для написания уникального аромата (!). Здесь вас ждут насыщенные…
❤682🥰120❤🔥112💯15🔥13👏8👍4
К другим новостям: сегодня снимали меня с продуктом. Задача: чтобы на фото я была похожа на свою YouTube-версию 😁 Получилось? Узнаваема ?
❤995😍253🔥159❤🔥16👍12🥰12👏11
НОВЫЙ ГОД ЖДАТЬ БУДЕМ ? А что если я скажу, что второе видео, это не только термос, но и упаковка для набора косметики?❤️🔥 А что если я скажу, что первое видео не ИИ, а реальная съемка?❤️🔥
❤1,520🤩492❤🔥286🔥71😍57🥰21👏9
ЭХ, ПРОДОЛЖАЕМ ЛЕТЕТЬ 🥹🚀 Спасибо всем за ваши обзоры и отзывы ! Напомню, что тон-флюид от GLOW ME доступен на нашем сайте и на ozon.селект (*но на селекте временно нет оттенка 01) И поделюсь, что учитывая нынешние темпы продаж, в понедельник я оплачиваю очередную партию в 5 тонн (!) флюида. Тут должна быть избитая шутка про то, что девочка покупает квартиру, а женщина встает на варку 5 тонн тональника 🤡 Помолите…
❤1,010🔥188💅136🙏76❤🔥37👍16😎15
ПРОМОКОД НА СКИДКУ НА САЙТЕ — ЧТООООО? Да, такого не было и, пожалуй, не будет. Потому что мы и так топчемся в ценах по нижней границе. Но мне так хотелось отметить огромное количество новых людей в этом чате 🥹🫶 Так что ловите промокод 7% TOTALSLAY 💅 Действителен с сегодня и до 15 сентября включительно 🫶 https://glowme.ru
🤩814❤🔥345❤304🔥56😁27👍21😘7
ТОН-ФЛЮИД УЖЕ НА OZON.СЕЛЕКТ ❤️🔥 И ДРУГИЕ ВАЖНЫЕ НОВОСТИ ⤵️ — Посмотрите на эти цены на тон-флюид, на кремы для тела 200 и 50 мл ❤️🔥 Да, мы экспериментально увели эти товары только на Ozon.Селект (название другое, но доставка в те же пункты пвз озон, или так же до вашего дома). Увели, потому что сейчас там самая низкая комиссия на товары. Сделали мы это, чтобы вы могли покупать товар по честным ценным. — Не буду …
❤760🔥168🤩134❤🔥27👍13💯12
ПРИДУМЫВАЕМ НОВЫЙ НАБОР ВМЕСТЕ ❤️🔥 Как вы знаете, впереди нас ждет (будем молиться за это ) грандиозный запуск жидких румян. Вижу, многие хотят скупить сразу несколько цветов. Чтобы это было сделать выгодно и приятно, мы придумали классный форм-фактор, для набора из трёх румян ❤️🔥 Осталось только решить — какие кладем. Напишите в комментариях в таком формате: 1,3,4 . Какие три цвета хотели бы видеть в одном набо…
❤789🔥195🤩114❤🔥30🥰22👍21😍18
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @olya_apetyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОЛЯ АПЕТЬЯН | GLOW ME” (@olya_apetyan), 55,594 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olya_apetyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.