Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Olya Aster

Channel

Olya Aster

@olyaaster

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,467subscribers

+153 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001971963554
TypeChannel
Username@olyaaster
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olyaaster

Growth

7,2977,4677,3826 August 2026 — 7,314 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,310 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,304 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,305 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,297 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,314 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,313 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,334 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,387 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,420 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,467 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net +153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,272–7,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:057,467+47
31 Aug 2026, 10:387,420+33
28 Aug 2026, 21:047,387+53
26 Aug 2026, 03:027,334+21
23 Aug 2026, 02:057,313-1
19 Aug 2026, 20:367,314+17
16 Aug 2026, 20:367,297-8
13 Aug 2026, 04:257,305+1
10 Aug 2026, 02:017,304-6
7 Aug 2026, 01:507,310-4
6 Aug 2026, 18:037,314first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.0%
avg views ÷ 7,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held15 (27 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total22,700
Reactions total2,013
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,255 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52851277765196057102,04462.8%
custom 542920048736890306692828.5%
custom 53798762110632781102838.69%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
95
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 15 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olyaaster. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,400 views198 reactions5 Starsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @maschakapsPhoto

Сухая ванная. Мокрые мысли 🫧

custom 5429200487368903066110custom 528512777651960571067custom 537987621106327811021

26 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,870 views265 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ph.: Маша Полянина

custom 5285127776519605710190custom 542920048736890306652custom 537987621106327811023

23 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈3,470 views300 reactions3 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Парочка очень симпатичных июльских кадров от Степы 🩵

custom 5285127776519605710215custom 542920048736890306662custom 537987621106327811023

21 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈3,540 views260 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

70 фотографий в новом посте ✨ Кадры от Игоря Куприянова

custom 5285127776519605710197custom 542920048736890306644custom 537987621106327811019

20 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈3,290 views339 reactions6 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Новая серия на Boosty здесь 🧩 Кадры от Степы

custom 5285127776519605710254custom 542920048736890306657custom 537987621106327811028

17 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,930 views217 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Серия от меня 10+ фотографий в новом посте ❤️

custom 5285127776519605710152custom 542920048736890306647custom 537987621106327811018

16 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,360 views193 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Нежность Ph.: Polina Baryshnikova

custom 5285127776519605710136custom 542920048736890306637custom 537987621106327811020

5 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈4,840 views241 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ph.: Joakim Karlsson ❤️

custom 5285127776519605710180custom 542920048736890306639custom 537987621106327811022

2 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈5,230 views23 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Очень нужны ваши голоса 🥰 https://t.me/boost/olyaaster

custom 528512777651960571023

2 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC≈4,460 views241 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ph.: Ilya Kuznetsov ✨

custom 5429200487368903066137custom 528512777651960571083custom 537987621106327811021

31 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC≈4,830 views287 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ph.: Vladimir Kortikov ✨

custom 5285127776519605710205custom 542920048736890306652custom 537987621106327811030

28 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC≈7,400 views276 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Кадр от Ильи ❤️

custom 5429200487368903066153custom 5285127776519605710100custom 537987621106327811023

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @olyaaster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Olya Aster” (@olyaaster), 7,467 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olyaaster.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.