Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олимпиадная геометрия

Channel

Олимпиадная геометрия

@olympgeom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,688subscribers

+87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001269972356
TypeChannel
Username@olympgeom
Created17 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olympgeom

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,6019,6889,644.56 August 2026 — 9,601 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,601 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,608 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,614 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,627 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,634 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,641 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,648 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,659 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,665 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,670 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,671 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,688 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,588–9,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:389,688+17
13 Sept 2026, 01:399,671+1
9 Sept 2026, 02:599,670+5
3 Sept 2026, 15:029,665+6
30 Aug 2026, 23:379,659+11
28 Aug 2026, 08:079,648+7
25 Aug 2026, 11:429,641+7
22 Aug 2026, 16:089,634+7
19 Aug 2026, 13:249,627+13
16 Aug 2026, 15:579,614+6
13 Aug 2026, 05:259,608+7
6 Aug 2026, 20:209,601no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:349,601first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,193 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66655.8%
🔥33027.7%
574.78%
👍534.44%
🤔342.85%
👎312.60%
221.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olympgeom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC≈3,700 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Проект конференции тургора "Геометрия окружностей"

42👎7👍5🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈5,180 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Понравились ли вам задачи финала Шарыгина?

  1. да (я участник)4%
  2. нет (я участник)6%
  3. да (не участник)19%
  4. нет (не участник)15%
  5. хочу просто ответы посмотреть55%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9

1 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,330 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @fullandpointFile

File, posted without a caption

🔥124

1 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈4,450 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Всем привет! Если вы хотите посмотреть лекцию про теорему Птолемея, но забыли зарегистрироваться на конференцию Профиматики, вы можете посмотреть ее на канале Олимпиадной геометрии. Если все пойдет по плану, то она начнет стримиться приблизительно через 98 минут https://youtube.com/live/8GgEKiQXp-A?feature=share

28👍5🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC≈2,660 views46 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @fullandpointFile

File, posted without a caption

27🔥7👎6👍51

30 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC≈3,150 views42 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @geometrykanal

Posted without readable text

411

29 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC≈3,750 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Понравятся ли вам задачи финала олимпиады Шарыгина?

  1. скорее всего да (я участник)8%
  2. скорее всего нет (я участник)6%
  3. скорее всего да (не участник)50%
  4. скорее всего нет (не участник)36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤔196

26 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC≈5,220 views128 reactions20 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Согласился 1-го августа прочитать лекцию про теорему Птолемея. Готовлю презентацию. Вот доказательство методом пристального вглядывания.

🔥10412👍63🤔21

15 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC≈6,920 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026

IMO-2026, Problem 2. Let ABC be a triangle and let points M and N be the midpoints of sides AB and AC, respectively. Let points K and L be chosen inside triangles BMC and BNC, respectively, such that K lies inside the angle LBA, L lies inside the angle ACK, and ∠ KBA= ∠ ACL, ∠ LBK= ∠ LNC, ∠ LCK= ∠ BMK Let O be the circumcentre of triangle AKL. Prove that OM = ON. (Proposed by Mykhailo Shtandenko, Ukraine)

78👎11👍62🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC≈7,000 views41 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeuroGeometryPhoto

Задача 87: Точки P и Q изогонально сопряжены в треугольнике ABC.Касательная в точке A к окружности (APQ) пересекает (ABC) в точке K.Оказалось, что PQ проходит через точку пересечения медиан M, докажите, что тогда окружность (KPQ) проходит через центр (ABC)

3442👎1

22 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC≈8,500 views36 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Во вписанном четырехугольнике ABCD точки M и N — середины сторон AD и BC соответственно. На стороне AD отмечена точка K и на стороне BC отмечена точка L такие, что ∠KCD=∠ABM и ∠LAB=∠CDN. Докажите, что прямая KL проходит через точку пересечения диагоналей четырехугольника.

303👍3

21 Jun 2026, 18:58 UTC≈11,300 views125 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Переводчику геометрической терминологии на заметку... Humpty Dumpty Шалтай Болтай Хитун Бовтун Ханьці Данці Шалам Балам Goggel Moggel Eilein Weilein Zanco Panco Wańka Wstańka Lilleri Lalleri Lille Trille Dingi Dungi Undi Dundi Tombolo Dondolo Uomo Uovo Rondu Pondu Oliņš Boliņš Kuugel Muugel Rafadan Kafadan ალთა ბალთა Hompie Kedompie خی، خی پریم קֶשֶׁת דַּבֶּשֶׁת

87207👎5👍3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @olympgeom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTCAnonymous Poll912 voters

Понравились ли вам задачи финала Шарыгина?

  1. да (я участник)4%
  2. нет (я участник)6%
  3. да (не участник)19%
  4. нет (не участник)15%
  5. хочу просто ответы посмотреть55%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTCAnonymous Poll705 voters

Понравятся ли вам задачи финала олимпиады Шарыгина?

  1. скорее всего да (я участник)8%
  2. скорее всего нет (я участник)6%
  3. скорее всего да (не участник)50%
  4. скорее всего нет (не участник)36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Математика | Геометрия
@algebra_shpargalki · 23,836
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
matolimp
@matolimp · 31,632
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
Поступашки - Олимпиады, ЕГЭ, ДВИ
@postupashki · 31,204
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
Codeforces Official
@codeforces_official · 72,950
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Профиматика для педагогов
@profimatika_for_teachers · 28,510
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Профиматика | ЕГЭ по Математике | Игорь Уколов и Влад Вуль
@profimatika · 42,450
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Tashkent_IMO
@tashkent_imo · 30,657
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Алексей Савватеев и Родная Школа
@alexei_savvateev · 34,048
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олимпиадная геометрия” (@olympgeom), 9,688 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olympgeom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.