Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for امید در لب مرز

Channel

امید در لب مرز

@omidlabemaarz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,929subscribers

+198 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272362157
TypeChannel
Username@omidlabemaarz
Created9 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/omidlabemaarz

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,7296,9426,835.56 August 2026 — 6,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,729 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,732 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,809 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,930 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,925 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,927 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,929 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,923 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,907 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,900 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,925 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,929 subscribers6,9296 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +198. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,697–6,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:386,929+4
14 Sept 2026, 01:376,925+25
10 Sept 2026, 05:566,900-7
4 Sept 2026, 16:006,907-16
31 Aug 2026, 15:376,923-6
28 Aug 2026, 20:466,929+2
25 Aug 2026, 20:486,927+2
22 Aug 2026, 12:486,925-17
19 Aug 2026, 13:436,942+12
16 Aug 2026, 17:256,930+121
12 Aug 2026, 19:246,809+77
10 Aug 2026, 04:156,732+3
7 Aug 2026, 09:196,729-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:216,731first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 70 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,927 reactions across 68 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓1,927100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC203 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @shiva_study

شما اگه برای شناخت خودت وقت نذاشتی، تلاش نکردی بفهمی واقعا کی هستی و میخوای کی باشی کل عمرت صرف ساختن چیزی میشه که جامعه ی اطرافت ازت خواسته و هیچوقت نفهمیدی این چیزیه که منم میخوام یا فقط دارم سابقه‌ی دیگرانو میسازم؟

🍓14

19 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC408 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

یا راهی خواهم ساخت یا راهی خواهم یافت.

🍓25

19 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC548 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

داستان زندگی خیلی هامون: یاد گرفته بودم عاشق چیزی نشوم، چرا که اگر عاشق چیزی میشدم ممکن آن را از دست بدهم! به همین دلیل پوسته و محافظتی به دور خود کشیدم تا کسی نتواند از آن رد شود...

🍓22

19 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC508 viewsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @tablighat8817

واسه‌ی رزرو یکشنبه آینده میتونین پیام بدین به بات.

19 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC709 views30 reactionsread 20 August 2026

عذرخواهی واقعی"ولی و اما" نداره! نمیگه زیاد حساس شدی ولی ببخشید، نمیگه"منظوری نداشتم"میگه حتی اگه منظورمم این نبود، میفهمم رفتارم چه اثری روت گذاشت! و مهم‌تر از همه، عذرخواهی واقعی فقط یک کلمه نیست در اصل تغییر رفتاره! اگر کسی هر بار زخمت میزنه و فقط «ببخشید» گفتن بلده، اما دوباره همون کار رو تکرار میکنه، شاید مشکلش این نیست که بلد نیست عذرخواهی کنه! شاید فقط یاد گرفته چطور بدون تغییر کردن، دوباره به رابطه برگرده.

🍓30

19 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC735 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026

وقتی در محیط غیرقابل پیش بینی بزرگ شده باشی، جذب آدمای بی‌ثبات و غیرقابل پیش بینی میشی. و این بی‌ثباتی بهت هیجان میده و برات جذابه، و نمیتونی ازش دل بکنی! چون به محیط اولیه‌ات و تنش هاش اعتیاد پیدا کردی.

🍓22

19 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC728 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026

هیچگاه نگذار زخم‌هایت تو را به کسی که نیستی تبدیل کند.

🍓19

18 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC954 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026

پوچی و بی‌حسی، بهای بی‌توجهی به احساساتیه که یه روزی نادیدشون گرفتی.

🍓25

18 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,240 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026

یچیز جالبی که درباره Adhd خوندم این بود که بعضی از افرادی که Adhd دارن، میل به شوخ طبعی دارن! بخاطر اینکه عملکرد مغزشون به این صورته که شوخ طبعی باعث میشه دوپامین در مغزشون ترشح بشه، و ترشح این هورمون باعث بهبود عملکرد علائم Adhd در اون ها میشه. از طرفی مغزشون چون در فیلتر کردن محرک‌های بیرونی و تمرکز بر روی یه موضوع خاص با مشکل مواجه هست، این موضوع گاهی باعث میشه فرد به جزئیاتی از محیط توجه کنه که بقیه توجه نمیکنن!

🍓34

18 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,220 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026

یه چیز جالبی که خوندم یبار این بود که، ساختار شیمیایی مغز افراد درگیر اضطراب باهم متفاوته، یعنی کافئین به جای اینکه به عنوان محرک اثر کنه و اون فرد و شارژ و سرحال کنه، بجاش به دلیل سطح دوپامین داخل بدن این افراد، کافئین به عنوان آرامبخش عمل میکنه و باعث خوابالودگی در اون ها میشه! در حالی که کافئین در بدن یسری افراد دیگه باعث میشه اون ها بیخواب بشن و بیدار بمونن.

🍓40

17 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,240 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

اینم یه گروه ۴ هزار نفره مخصوص کنکور ارشد روانشناسیه که کسی ادارش میکنه که روانشناسی خونده و پکیج زبان میفروشه، دیگران و صرفا واسه اینکه بگن کدوم سمتن ریمو میکنه. خلاصه آگاه باشین و این گروه و این آدم و بشناسین.

🍓24

17 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,170 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026

هیچی بدتر از این نیست یه گروه بزرگ کنکوری که پکیج درسی کنکور میفروشن عرزشی باشن، یعنی فاجعه‌است‌. حالا عرزشی و کار ندارم گروه درسی روانشناسی که ادما حداقل میتونن نظرات همو بشنون نه چون گروه زیر دستشونه تا ببینه کی تو جبهه خودش نیست ریمو کنن کلی آدم رو. خداروشکر منکه نگرفتم از پکیج امثال اینا‌. ولی کسایی که فهمیدن یسری از کسایی که این گروه کنکوری بزرگ و میگردونن عرزشین پشیمون شدن از خریدشون. و عملا کسایی که بدون توهین

🍓26

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @omidlabemaarz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr. Ramin Rahmani
@RahmaniRamin · 27,699
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“امید در لب مرز” (@omidlabemaarz), 6,929 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omidlabemaarz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.