Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for امید در لب مرز

Channel

امید در لب مرز

@omidlabemaarz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,827subscribers

+96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272362157
TypeChannel
Username@omidlabemaarz
Descriptionدر مسیر شناخت روان💫 کانال تبلیغات: https://t.me/tablighat8817
Created9 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/omidlabemaarz

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7296,9426,835.56 August 2026 — 6,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,729 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,732 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,809 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,930 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,925 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,927 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,929 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,923 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,907 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,900 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,925 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,929 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,915 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,884 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,883 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,878 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,873 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,876 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,875 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,870 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,852 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,842 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,827 subscribers6,8276 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,697–6,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:476,827-15
1 Nov 2026, 11:356,842-10
29 Oct 2026, 04:206,852-18
26 Oct 2026, 12:216,870-5
23 Oct 2026, 19:016,875-1
21 Oct 2026, 05:276,876+3
18 Oct 2026, 02:506,873-5
15 Oct 2026, 02:476,878-5
11 Oct 2026, 19:586,883-1
5 Oct 2026, 02:566,884-31
26 Sept 2026, 16:396,915-14
17 Sept 2026, 20:386,929+4
14 Sept 2026, 01:376,925+25
10 Sept 2026, 05:566,900-7
4 Sept 2026, 16:006,907-16
31 Aug 2026, 15:376,923-6
28 Aug 2026, 20:466,929+2
25 Aug 2026, 20:486,927+2
22 Aug 2026, 12:486,925-17
19 Aug 2026, 13:436,942first reading

Engagement

111 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 6,827 subscribers
Avg views / post
816
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 111 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held111 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total33,460
Reactions total689
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,530
Videos
≈164
Links
≈298

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,616 reactions across 108 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓2,616100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (4.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC116 viewsread 7 November 2026

چه وایب خوبییی🥲🥲 چه عکسای نازیی✨

7 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC269 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026

فکر میکنم اینکه میگن زن و مرد مکمل همدیگه‌ان یکی از حرفای کلیشه‌ایه که تو مخمون کردن، اگه زن و مرد بطور قطعی مکمل هم بودن که لزبین‌ها و گِی‌ها وجود نداشتن، در اصل مکمل هم بودن به جنسیت نیست به نوع ارتباط امن و خوبیه که آدما میتونن باهم برقرار کنن، حالا یکیم اصلا آدم رابطه نیست و تنهایی حال میکنه و بازم اون جمله کلیشه‌ای واسش صدق نمیکنه. حتی دوتا دوست هم میتونن مکمل هم باشن و خصوصیاتشون مکمل همدیگه باشه.

🍓14

7 Nov 2026, 10:17 UTC328 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026

چیزهایی که بهشون عادت کردیم، لزوما چیزی نیستن که برامون خوبه، خیلی اوقات عادت با آشنا بودن گره میخوره و برای همین فکر میکنیم چیزی که آشناست پس چیز نرمالیه، ممکنه به رابطه‌ای ناسالم، اضطرابی همیشگی یا حتی نادیده گرفته شدن عادت کرده باشیم. آشنا بودن یک تجربه، دلیلی بر سالم بودنش نیست.

🍓12

7 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC360 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

این چنل منو یاد خاطره‌ها میندازه، وقتی گوشه‌هایی از زندگیش رو ثبت میکنه، به آدم حس ورق زدن یه دفتر خاطرات رو میده، انگار برای چند لحظه وارد دنیای شخصی کسی میشی و از دریچه‌ی نگاه اون، زندگی رو تماشا میکنی، و بشدت هم وایب پینترستی عکساشو دوست دارم✨

🍓4

7 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC360 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @zzzohrzzzPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓4

6 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC551 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026

یکی از چیزای خیلی خوبی که تراپی واسم داشت این بود که تو تنظیم هیجاناتت و یاد میگیری، وقتی حالت بده چطور با یسری تکنیک‌ها حالت و بهتر کنی و وقتی این کارها رو مداوم بکنی توی مسیرهای عصبی مغزت شکل میگیره و تثبیت میشه، و این باعث شد وقتایی که حالم و یچیزی بد میکنه هرچقدرم بد بشه حالم، انگار مغزم دیگه تنظیم کردن هیجاناتش و یاد گرفته و نمیذاره زیاد عمیق بشم تو حال بد و خودبخود کم کم رو به استیبل شدن میرم.

🍓20

6 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC627 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026

نحوه‌ای که با خودمون حرف میزنیم، میتونه از رفتار خیلی از آدم‌های اطرافمون تاثیرگذارتر باشه! هیچکس به اندازه‌ی منتقد درونیمون سخت‌گیر نیست، صدایی که حتی بعد از یک موفقیت هم بجای تحسین، دنبال ایراد میگرده.

🍓21

6 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC581 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @makhfigaheman

هرچی نقاب‌هاشون صاف‌تر، چروک‌های درونشون عمیق‌تر!

🍓12

6 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC692 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026

آدم هرچقدر دانسته‌هاش کمتر باشه، آدم‌های بیشتری رو باسواد می‌بینه، چون هنوز قدرت تشخیص دانش واقعی رو از ادعای دانایی رو پیدا نکرده! و چون عمق ندانستن‌های خودش رو درک نکرده، هر اطلاعات بدیهی رو مبنی بر سواد بالا میدونه و اینجاست که آدمای اشتباهی رو برای یادگیری ازشون انتخاب میکنه.

🍓16

6 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC669 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @Vaguooyeh

دنیا انعکاسِ نیتِ آدم‌هاست.

🍓3

6 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC764 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026

وقتی درباره‌ی کسی به نتیجه‌ای میرسیم، ناخودآگاه فقط رفتارهایی رو می‌بینیم که باور اولیه‌مون رو تایید میکنن. بخاطر همینه که ذهن ما همیشه دنبال حقیقت نیست! فقط دنبال شواهدیه که ثابت کنه از اول درست فکر میکرده.

🍓16

5 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC130 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

انتخاب دوست و پارتنر بازتابی از احترام به خودمونه! بخون حتما ادامه‌ش رو.

🍓3

Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @omidlabemaarz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 10 posts on @omidlabemaarz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خونه شماره ۸
@homenumber8 · 19,600
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
Dr. Ramin Rahmani
@RahmaniRamin · 27,481
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“امید در لب مرز” (@omidlabemaarz), 6,827 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omidlabemaarz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.