Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for On9 Word Chain Bot

Bot

On9 Word Chain Bot

@on9wordchainbot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

15,962monthly users

-905 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID840338206
TypeBot
Username@on9wordchainbot
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/on9wordchainbot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,68016,86716,273.57 August 2026 — 16,867 monthly users8 August 2026 — 16,822 monthly users12 August 2026 — 16,755 monthly users14 August 2026 — 16,517 monthly users17 August 2026 — 16,432 monthly users17 August 2026 — 16,432 monthly users20 August 2026 — 16,232 monthly users22 August 2026 — 16,119 monthly users26 August 2026 — 16,224 monthly users28 August 2026 — 15,680 monthly users31 August 2026 — 16,046 monthly users2 September 2026 — 16,006 monthly users6 September 2026 — 15,974 monthly users11 September 2026 — 16,016 monthly users15 September 2026 — 15,962 monthly users15,9627 August 202615 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 39 days, net -905. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,502–17,045 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:5415,962-54
11 Sept 2026, 19:4016,016+42
6 Sept 2026, 02:1715,974-32
2 Sept 2026, 13:2316,006-40
31 Aug 2026, 08:4916,046+366
28 Aug 2026, 09:0415,680-544
26 Aug 2026, 12:3616,224+105
22 Aug 2026, 17:4716,119-113
20 Aug 2026, 09:2416,232-200
17 Aug 2026, 21:0216,432no change
17 Aug 2026, 09:4416,432-85
14 Aug 2026, 10:2416,517-238
12 Aug 2026, 06:1216,755-67
8 Aug 2026, 08:5016,822-45
7 Aug 2026, 00:4816,867first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“On9 Word Chain Bot” (@on9wordchainbot), 15,962 monthly users as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/on9wordchainbot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.