Bitcoin Miner IREN Shares Fall as AI Conversion Costs Mount - Decrypt

Channel
One Crypto Feed with Avalanche
@onecryptofeed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
8,686subscribers
-125 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001781270828 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onecryptofeed |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onecryptofeed |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 8,686 | -19 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 8,705 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 8,706 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 8,716 | -12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 8,728 | -21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 8,749 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 8,758 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 8,760 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 8,764 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 8,769 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 8,783 | -15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 8,798 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 8,804 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 8,810 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 8,811 | first reading |
Engagement
370 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 370 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 41.2% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 29.4% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 370 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 370 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Avalanche Summit NYC will explore what happens when blockchain moves from experimentation into production, from tokenized assets and private credit to enterprise infrastructure and consumer products. Join us September 16–17 and secure your ticket while they’re still available: https://www.avalanchesummit.com/ Use code ONECRYPTOFEED15 for 15% off! Ad
Bitwise fund is first Solana ETF to hit $1 billion AUM - The Block
Bitcoin Traders Watch Fed Chair Warsh for Clues—And Get Nothing - Decrypt
Bitcoin Slips Below $80,000 After Kevin Warsh Inflation Vow - Bloomberg
Bybit launches 24/7 options on stock perpetuals, starting with SpaceX and Nvidia - The Block
BitGo to buy NYDIG trading arm for $42.5M in cash and stock plus $15M earnout - CoinDesk
Ethereum ETFs Take $226M in a Day, Almost Matching Bitcoin's Haul - Decrypt
SBI Holdings invests $270 million in Ajaib, taking 20% stake amid Asia digital asset push - The Block
IREN’s $25 billion-$30 billion AI buildout may have ‘spooked’ investors, Bernstein says - The Block
Ethena looks beyond crypto to squeeze yield from booming equity perpetuals - CoinDesk
SBI acquires 20% stake in Indonesia's Ajaib for $270 million to expand yen stablecoin in Southeast Asia - CoinDesk
Showing the 12 most recent of 370 posts we hold for @onecryptofeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@unfolded_defi · 21,743
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
@the_block_crypto · 24,863
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,520
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
@bloombergcrypto · 25,881
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
@TreeNewsFeed · 34,852
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@crypto_fundraising · 27,910
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
@unfolded · 117,072
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@wublockchainenglish · 228,554
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@marketsAlpha · 25,199
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,672
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,133
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@investigations · 108,575
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
@kirbycrypto · 39,519
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@infinityhedge · 45,801
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@cryptomiami · 104,494
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@marketfeed · 38,805
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
@www_Bitcoin_com · 53,707
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@glassnode · 44,076
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@JustTopico · 32,858
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@icodrops · 42,565
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
@layergg · 19,543
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
@bitcoin_price · 56,717
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@cryptogoodreads · 19,988
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
@MetaEraNews · 19,890
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“One Crypto Feed with Avalanche” (@onecryptofeed), 8,686 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onecryptofeed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.