📖 ارز TIA چه کاربردی دارد؟ راهنمای شناخت سلستیا و ریسکهای آن TIA توکن بومی شبکه سلستیاست. با کاربرد آن در انتشار داده، استیکینگ و حاکمیت آشنا شوید و پیش از معامله، هزینهها و ریسکها را بررسی کنید. مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس

Channel
صرافی ارز دیجیتال وانفینکس
@onefinex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,931subscribers
-879 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001731675363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onefinex |
| Description | 🔷 سرمایهگذاری هوشمند با وانفینکس 🔷️ 🔴تحلیل رایگان با AI وانفینکس🔴 https://t.me/tradepro_ai 📈 آموزش مهارتهای ضروری ترید 📈 پشتیبانی تلگرام: @onefinex_support وبسایت: https://oneFinex.com |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onefinex |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:40 | 6,931 | -24 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:18 | 6,955 | -32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:48 | 6,987 | -40 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 7,027 | -63 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 7,090 | -88 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 7,178 | -17 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 7,195 | -21 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 7,216 | -27 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 7,243 | -54 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 7,297 | -111 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 7,408 | -91 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 7,499 | -37 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 7,536 | -48 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 7,584 | -75 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 7,659 | -38 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 7,697 | -34 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 7,731 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 7,760 | -37 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 7,797 | -13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 7,810 | first reading |
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.30%
- avg views ÷ 6,931 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 90.4
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.73%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,169 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 418
- Videos
- 31
- Links
- 272
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 90.6% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📰 اصلاح باگ ساخت توکن در XRP Ledger؛ مجوز سوزاندن چه مشکلی داشت؟ شبکه XRP Ledger در ۴ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ اصلاحیه fixCleanup3_4_0 را فعال کرد. این تغییر نقصی را برطرف میکند که در شرایطی به حساب دارای مجوز سوزاندن توکن اجازه میداد توکن جدید هم ایجاد کند. کویندسک خبر را ۵ نوامبر منتشر کرد؛ تاریخ فعالسازی اصلاحیه یک روز… مطالعهٔ کامل خبر در وانفینکس
❤1
📖 پیام جایزه رمزارزی را چطور بررسی کنیم؟ یک تمرین برای شناخت کلاهبرداری با یک پیام ساختگیِ جایزه تمرین کنید: پیش از باز کردن لینک، اتصال کیف پول یا امضای درخواست، چه چیزهایی را باید بررسی کرد و اگر اقدامی انجام شده باشد چه باید کرد؟ مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس
❤1
📰 دموکراتها کنترل هر دو مجلس کنگره آمریکا را به دست آوردند؛ مسیر قانونگذاری رمزارزها چه میشود؟ دموکراتها در انتخابات میاندورهای ۳ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ کنترل مجلس نمایندگان و سنای آمریکا را به دست آوردند. آسوشیتدپرس پیروزی آنها در هر دو مجلس را اعلام کرده و اکسیوس نیز بر پایه نتایج این خبرگزاری گزارش داده است. نتیجه بر… مطالعهٔ کامل خبر در وانفینکس
❤1🔥1😱1
📖 چطور آلتسیزن را با یک مثال عددی بررسی کنیم؟ با یک تمرین فرضی یاد بگیرید عملکرد آلتکوینها را با بیتکوین مقایسه کنید و خطاهایی را که نتیجه بررسی را گمراهکننده میکنند بشناسید. مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس
❤1
📖 ارز TUT چیست؟ کاربرد توکن Tutorial و روش بررسی قیمت و ریسک آن TUT توکن پروژه Tutorial است. با کاربرد آن در حمایت از تولیدکنندگان محتوای آموزشی، شیوه بررسی هزینه معامله و نکات انتقال آشنا شوید. مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس
❤1
📰 نیوجرسی دستور استیکینگ کوینبیس را لغو کرد؛ زمان بازگشت دسترسی هنوز روشن نیست اداره اوراق بهادار نیوجرسی در ۳۰ اکتبر ۲۰۲۶ دستور توقف و جریمه مربوط به خدمات استیکینگ کوینبیس را لغو کرد. کوینتلگراف این خبر را در ۲ نوامبر، یک روز پیش از انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا، منتشر کرد. تصمیم نیوجرسی راه بازگشت دسترسی کاربرا… مطالعهٔ کامل خبر در وانفینکس
📖 معاملات مارجین چیست؟ یک مثال عددی و راه بررسی خطاهای رایج با یک معامله فرضی ببینید اهرم چگونه سود و زیان را تغییر میدهد، هزینه وام چه اثری دارد و پیش از ثبت سفارش چه چیزهایی را باید بررسی کرد. مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس
📰 خروج ۶۴۳ میلیون دلار از ETFهای بیتکوین در آخرین روز معاملاتی اکتبر صندوقهای قابل معامله نقدی بیتکوین در آمریکا روز جمعه ۳۰ اکتبر ۲۰۲۶ خروج خالص حدود ۶۴۳ میلیون دلار را ثبت کردند. این بزرگترین خروج روزانه آنها از ۲۵ ژوئن بود. رویداد جمعه در نخستین جلسه کامل معاملات این صندوقها پس از رخداد امنیتی بایننس اتفاق … مطالعهٔ کامل خبر در وانفینکس
📖 ربات ترید یا دستیار تحلیل هوش مصنوعی؟ تفاوت کاربرد و اختیار معامله ربات ترید میتواند طبق تنظیمات به بازار سفارش بفرستد؛ دستیار تحلیل معمولاً داده را بررسی میکند و نتیجه را به کاربر میسپارد. تفاوت این دو را با یک معامله مستند و یک تمرین کاربردی ببینید. مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس
❤1
📖 اهرم در تریدینگ ویو؛ یک تمرین عددی برای بررسی سود، زیان و خطاهای رایج با یک معامله فرضی ببینید اهرم چگونه سود و زیان احتمالی را تغییر میدهد و پیش از ثبت سفارش، کدام عددها و تنظیمات را باید دوباره بررسی کنید. مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس
❤2
📖 سیگنال ارز دیجیتال با هوش مصنوعی؛ نحوه دریافت و بررسی قبل از معامله برای استفاده از سیگنال هوش مصنوعی، باید بدانید خروجی چگونه ساخته شده، به کدام بازار و بازه زمانی مربوط است و چه زمانی دیگر اعتبار ندارد. یک نمونه مستند از کریپتوهاپر، تفاوت امتیاز مدل و نتیجه معامله را روشن میکند. مطالعهٔ کامل مقاله در وانفینکس
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @onefinex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tonkcommunity · 172,981
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@MultiBankio_Announcements · 128,985
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صرافی ارز دیجیتال وانفینکس” (@onefinex), 6,931 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onefinex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.