Renal tubular acidosis

Channel
RECOMMENDOMA
@onepiece99991
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,213subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001789303153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onepiece99991 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onepiece99991 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 2,213 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 2,216 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:26 | 2,211 | +32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 2,179 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 2,177 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Some not all (cardiology)
Some not all(updated)
File, posted without a caption
Dr. #Arshad problem solving about ischemic chest pain PDF notes PDF notes
Nenji nerd podcast
Nenji nerd notes
Acute coronary syndrome case discussion_dr Arshad PDF notes
Updated B&B 1 B&B 2 Mehlman_medical
Updated B&B 1 B&B 2
حاول تدخل هنا ،،الكثير من الأمور النافعة الي تحتاجها مستقبلآ
هاي قناة ملحق ،،حتكون فقط للملفات الي مو مؤشرة يعني ب عبارة أخرى القناة الأصل ،،حيكون بيها استمرارية ب نشر الملفات المؤشرة بس الملف نفسه إذا تحب تقراه بلا تأشير حتلكاه ب Recommendoma_Library
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @onepiece99991. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BoardsandBeyond2024 · 41,122
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@al_mustansiriya · 37,219
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RECOMMENDOMA” (@onepiece99991), 2,213 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onepiece99991.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.