Channel
@onewaydev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
568subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001627731616 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onewaydev |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onewaydev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 568 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 567 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 564 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 563 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 562 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 52 | 32.7% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 29.6% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5368451275933375098 | 12 | 7.55% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.26% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вайбкодинг и платформы Вчера завершил миграцию проектов клиента с платформы для вайбкодинга, о которой я не раз писал в канале, на обычный хостинг Почему было принято такое решение? ❓ 1. Независимая инфраструктура. Пока я работал с платформой, я буквально в каждом проекте упирался в ограничения. На своем хостинге это всегда решаемая задача, на чужой платформе нужно ждать, пока другие люди (со своими приоритетами в…
❤11🔥7👍3
Пускай мои оформления и не выигрывают голосований, однако теперь админки в них будут вообще всегда и максимально нативные Параллельно с текущими проектами пилю свой редактор для конструктора тренингов и для блоков страниц и уроков. IDE или API не требует, а реализовать можно абсолютно любой как хочешь гибко настраиваемый кастомный блок (хоть зеро-блок как в тильде). Ограничения из-за стандартных блоков — давайте до …
🔥18custom 53684512759333750985👍3👏2❤1
Какой проект вам понравился больше всего? 🔥
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 53684512759333750984
Одно из моих оформлений попало в список финалистов 😎 Буду благодарен за голос, хотя больше все-таки отдавайте предпочтение тому, за что искренне хотелось бы проголосовать 💪 https://t.me/getcourse_official/3689
🏆4🔥4custom 53684512759333750983
Второе оформление, которое я показал на конкурсе - клубное, я делал его для фитнес-клуба FitSpo. Тут задача была совсем другая. В клубе нет потоков в привычном смысле. Ученики приходят в любой момент и двигаются по своему флоу, а оформление должно само подстраиваться под разные сегменты учеников Логику расписания я построил так, чтобы она собиралась автоматически. · Если у ученика демо-доступ, его неделя формируетс…
❤8
И еще одно оформление :з
❤3
Оформление для Школы органического земледелия на платформе GetCourse. Так как я уже много лет работаю с ШОЗ, помимо соответствия макету мне сказали "сделай как можно более автоматизированным". Я постарался убрать из работы техспецов всю рутину, которая обычно съедает время между потоками и может привести к ошибкам из-за "замыленного глаза". Картинки для тренингов теперь можно загружать прямо из общего списка, не про…
❤7
Video, posted without a caption
❤5👍1
GetCourse проводит конкурс на лучший дизайн на платформе 👇 Показываю две свои работы
❤3
🛌 Верстальщики могут спать спокойно и не бояться конкуренции от нейросетей, пока на создание дизайн-макетов нанимают дизайнеров без опыта веб-дизайна 🤵 Верстка в вебе — это процесс воссоздания на реальной веб-странице того, что изобразил в макете дизайнер. Процесс это рутинный и кропотливый, поскольку каждый элемент нужно прокликать и посмотреть его свойства, чтобы написать эти свойства в виде кода разметки CSS 👨🎨…
🔥15😁7❤4
ПРОДЛЕНИЕ ПЛАГИНОВ — возможность есть! Сегодня в переписке с одной из школ выяснил, что если написать в техподдержку по поводу продления плагинов, то есть шанс, что ответят неправду: что продление невозможно На самом деле невозможна только установка в новые аккаунты. Продление было перенесено с платежки Chatium на платежку гет-модуля моего аккаунта, после чего происходит начисление доступов, как и раньше На страни…
👍6
Дайджест изменений за последние месяцы Работал не покладая рук с начала года, аж некогда было выкладывать посты в канале. Так что постараюсь срезюмировать все проделанное в одном посте 😎 ✅ Сайт с портфолио получил пополнение. Теперь там пара новых проектов, где для реализации использовался GetCourse IDE в школах, где он остался ✅ С сайта портфолио можно перейти на страницу продления плагинов. Продление плагинов так…
🔥8👍6❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @onewaydev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой проект вам понравился больше всего? 🔥
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если OneWay нужно будет русифицировать, какой вариант звучит лучше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антон One Way | Разработка для онлайн-школ | GetCourse PRO” (@onewaydev), 568 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onewaydev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.