Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Onion Soft 💾 (РЕЗЕРВ)

Channel

Onion Soft 💾 (РЕЗЕРВ)

@onionsofts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,117subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002381789711
TypeChannel
Username@onionsofts
Created7 November 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/onionsofts

Growth

9,1139,1869,149.57 August 2026 — 9,153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,148 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,134 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,135 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,176 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,186 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,169 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,153 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,161 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,113 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,117 subscribers9,1177 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,102–9,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 22:149,117+4
2 Sept 2026, 15:259,113-48
31 Aug 2026, 00:599,161+8
27 Aug 2026, 15:379,153-16
24 Aug 2026, 20:039,169-17
21 Aug 2026, 00:439,186+10
17 Aug 2026, 17:579,176+41
14 Aug 2026, 08:159,135+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:149,134-14
8 Aug 2026, 04:129,148-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:169,153first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 7 November 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.80%
avg views ÷ 9,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
255
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 3 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held3 (7 November 202428 August 2026)
Views total255
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
70
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 2 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
70
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onionsofts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 3 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 November 2024 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC255 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Встречайте глобальное обновление OnionGram Мы провели масштабное обновление OnionGram, полностью расширив возможности бота и добавив новые мощные инструменты для работы с Telegram. Все функции вы сможете посмотреть прописав команду .help в чате с другом. 🟧 Ссылка на бота: @true_oniongram_bot

15 Jun 2025, 22:10 UTC≈127,000 views0 reactions70 Starsread 28 August 2026

🟧Перейти на канал можно по ссылке — https://t.me/+PHdbQVjROEszNTlk 🟧Наши другие проекты: Onion AI 🌟 — Искусственный интеллект, нейросети и технологии будущего в одном месте. Onion x Osint 🌟 — Расследования, цифровые следы, проверки фактов. OnionHub 🟧 — Мы задаем тренды в дарке. OnionGram 🟧 — Тот самый OnionGram. OnionMod 🟧 — Твой цифровой архив для всего что исчезает. Onion Chat 🟧 — Чат для общения. Onion Osi

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @onionsofts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Onion Soft 💾 (РЕЗЕРВ)” (@onionsofts), 9,117 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onionsofts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.