Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OnlyAnalyst by Алексей Гаврилов

Channel

OnlyAnalyst by Алексей Гаврилов

@onlyanalystgroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,467subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001586330290
TypeChannel
Username@onlyanalystgroup
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/onlyanalystgroup

Growth

2,4672,4762,471.56 August 2026 — 2,476 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,474 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,473 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,470 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,472 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,473 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,470 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,473 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,472 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,467 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,466–2,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 02:462,467-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:132,472-1
26 Aug 2026, 01:162,473+3
23 Aug 2026, 10:082,470-3
19 Aug 2026, 13:072,473+1
16 Aug 2026, 20:472,472+2
13 Aug 2026, 05:182,470-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:322,473-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:412,474-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:462,476no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:372,476first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8444.9%
🔥4624.6%
👍4423.5%
🥰115.88%
custom 533950648200830480310.535%
custom 534176988682362385610.535%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
388
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
445
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHVrrb3128 July 202628 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 30 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC327 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо за обратную связь по shorts! Я немного переделал формат и вот встречайте shorts 2.0. Поменял динаику камеры, улучшил анимации, увеличил плотность полезной информации на 1 секунду видео. Что думаете? https://youtube.com/shorts/L2a-iZgeBXA

6👍2🔥2🥰2

30 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC318 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! В догонку к моему видео про анализ зарплат аналитиков вышла статья от Habra. У них цифры сильно выше, чем те, что докладывал я. Возможно, это из-за разницы в методике подсчета, тем не менее любопытно и ободряюще. Также в статье можно почитать мои скромные комментарии по теме! Всем приятного чтения. https://habr.com/ru/companies/habr_career/articles/1064920/

4👍3custom 53395064820083048031

28 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC388 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHVrrb3

Тема «куда двигаться в данных в 2026-м» стала объемнее: к базовой развилке между тремя ролями добавился вопрос, что с каждой из них делает ИИ Три соседние профессии: аналитик, дата-инженер и Data Scientist (специалист по анализу данных). У каждой — свой стек, свой рабочий день и своя вилка по з/п. И роль ИИ у каждой своя: где-то он забирает часть рутины, где-то заметно поднимает зарплату. 30 июля в 18:00 мск Анатол

👍4

28 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC352 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем спасибо за фидбек, получаю очень неплохие цифры на “возрождении канал”. Эксперементирую с форматами. Благодаря Shorts уже пробил рекорды по views. Хотя на топовых видео в большом формате: 6к, 8к и 20к просмотров. В Shorts самое важное хук: тебе дают до 1000 просмотров и смотрят результаты и уже потом решают показывать дальше или нет. Вот еще один: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/axz13NOE5v4

3🔥3🥰1

27 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC387 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если хочешь развиваться в аналитике — войти в профессию, углубиться в науку о данных или вырасти в карьере — в Центральном университете (ЦУ) есть магистратура под каждый сценарий. И на нее можно получить грант до 75%. Места ограничены, дедлайн подачи заявок — 20 августа. «Продуктовая аналитика» — это офлайн-программа (пары по вечерам и в выходные в центре Москвы). Студенты учатся превращать данные в продуктовые реше

👍3🔥31

26 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC413 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Решил оплатить Kimi K3 и попробовать использовать для работы, но могу только встать в лист ожидания 😂 Такого я еще не встречал. Скоро токены по талонам будем получать, как в фильме «Время» с Тимберлейком. В связи с этим думаю взять Macbook Pro с 128 GB на случай конца света. Закину туда модельку 100+ млрд. параметров, всю Википедию, базовые репозитории, все книги. Потом буду восстанавливать общество 😂 Цена вопро

👍4🔥21custom 53417698868236238561

25 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC391 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что думаете про формат разбора задач с собеседований в Shorts? Норм или стрем? https://youtube.com/shorts/2k9VuhRx_fo

5👍3🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC405 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Только я отписался от Claude Code и решил переходить на Codex, так сразу выпустили Opus 5. Результаты мне очень нравятся. Ощущения как от Fable5, до ограничений. Буду делать короткий обзор в Shorts сегодня, а пока можно почитать по ссылке: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5

4👍2🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC445 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня последнее видео серии и пока все же сконцентрируюсь на Shorts. Я провел масштабное исследование, проанализировав 4500 актуальных вакансий на HeadHunter. В этом видео мы разберем «честные цифры» без прикрас: от реальных медианных зарплат Junior-специалистов до того, как опыт Senior-аналитика увеличивает доход. Вы узнаете, какие навыки стали обязательными в 2026 году и какие роли сейчас наиболее востребованы

8👍3🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC437 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О. Генри умел упаковать целую жизнь в пару страниц. Вдохновившись этим принципом (и давним правилом про «краткость - сестра таланта»), я пошёл дальше в экспериментах с контентом и попробовал сделать обучающие Shorts. Уложить внятную и полезную мысль в 60 секунд - это тот ещё вызов. Что даёт такой формат? 1. Вынуждает отсекать абсолютно всё лишнее. 2. Заставляет по-новому взглянуть на привычные базовые вещи. 3. П

👍92🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC451 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Команда, нужна ваша помощь! Промт из одного предложения и бесплатный ИИ-агент собирает настоящий проект для портфолио: парсер автомобилей через скрытое API, дашборд с аналитикой цен и деплой на реальный сервер. Результат не скриншот в видео, а живой сайт с открытым кодом: ссылки ниже. Когда-то парсил этих же автодилеров руками на requests и BeautifulSoup, теперь то же самое агент делает за вечер. Главные фишки пр

6👍2🔥2

21 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC469 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребят, всем привет! Решил провести эксперимент с новым форматом. Оказалось, что Shorts записывать и делать намного сложнее, чем длинные видео :) Что думаете? https://youtube.com/shorts/VGgtWdYzc7Q?is=TSJTly8GfmbHW_0p

7🔥4🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @onlyanalystgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Job for Analysts & Data Scientists
@foranalysts · 36,273
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OnlyAnalyst by Алексей Гаврилов” (@onlyanalystgroup), 2,467 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyanalystgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.