Channel
@onlyshear
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,425subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001024505331 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onlyshear |
| Description | ارتباط بامدیر درتلگرام t.me/HOS_SE_IN سرای شعر (شوریده دلان) گلچینی ازبرترین ونابترین اشعارکهن ومعاصربا زیباترین اهنگهای خاطره انگیز و موزیک ویدیوهای جذاب |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onlyshear |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 9,425 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 9,426 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 9,440 | +26 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 9,414 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 9,400 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 9,399 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 9,397 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 9,397 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (27 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 39,858 |
| Reactions total | 235 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
194 reactions across 50 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 59.3% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 23.2% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 7.22% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 4.12% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 3.09% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.515% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍀💐🌼 از بهترین و دلنشینترین کانالهای تلگرام لذت ببریم 🧿 ذکرهای شگفت انگیز 📿 @jazbaramashh 📕 دل تراپی @Del_Therapy 🌻 کتاب گویای من @ketabegooya_man 🍎 آرا حقوقی قضایی و نظریات مشورتی @ARA_HOGHOOGHI_GHAZAIE 🍀 کتابخانه طبی، درمان با داروهای خانگی @danyalshafa 🌻 جادوی گیاهان دارویی طب سینوی @teb_sinawi 🍎 زبان ترکی رو قورت بده @ArazTurkish 🍀 کتابخانه کودک و نوجوان @childrenbook 🌻 آموزشگاه طبی سید @samsadeghitebeslami 🍎…
برای نگاهی ، دنیا را برای لبخندی، آسمان را برای #بوسهای... نمیدانم...برای بوسهای! ترا چه خواهم بخشید! #گوستاو_آدولفو
❤3❤🔥1
دلم پـــــر میڪشد به هوایِ تــۥــــو دل است دیگر؛ بی هیچ اما واگری تنگ میشود #درنــــا_تشڪری
❤2😢1
دل به دام زلف تو جانا گرفتار آمده شوق دیدارت به جانم بس شرر بار آمده عطرتوپیچیده و آتش دلِ مجنون زده جلوهء ماهِ رُخت خوش بر شبِ تارآمده مستی از چشمان تو حال دلم را تازه کرد باده از لبهای شیرینت به افطار آمده عشق با هرجلوه اش کآتش به جان ها می زند هر که عاشق شد، یقین در آتش یار آمده شعر من از آتش حسرت به شبها شعله زد شور تو آئینهء دل بس به تکرار آمده این غزل را با تو گفتم، تا بدانی عاشقم دل به دریا دادهام، …
❤4🥰1
چه شود، جور شود یکسره گاهی، چیزی مثلاً نصف شب و صورت ماهی، چیزی از سفر آمده باشی و ببینی اینجا عاشق سادهدل و چشم به راهی، چیزی دستهای تو پناهنده و آغوش تو اَمن منِ سرگشته به دنبال پناهی، چیزی از تو تا عشق، نفس، شعر برایت گفتم تا به من هم بکنی نیمنگاهی، چیزی همهی سهم من از داشتنت این شده است: سوز دل بردن و افسوسی و آهی، چیزی دوزخی هستم و از سمت بهشت تو چه دور کاش از سوی تو یک ذرّه گناهی، چیزی! #سارا_صابر …
❤2👍2
هر فصلِ حضورت به دلم، دفتر شعر است مضمونِ غزلگونه ترین حال، تویی تو... محمد_بزاز
❤4
File, posted without a caption
❤3
حریصی ، ظالمی ، بیمنطقی ، دنبالِ آزاری .. تو هم فهمیدهای من عاشقم ، فهمیدهای آری !! به غیر از سالها دلتنگی و تشویش و بیخوابی .. مگر چیزی میان ماست ؟ حاشا کن که حق داری !! تو مشهوری و معروفی ، به زیبایی و یکتایی .. شبیه من ولی هستند انسانهای بسیاری !! من از عشقت نوشتم سالها ، شد دفتر شعری .. تو تنها دفتر شعر من و در دست اغیاری !! خوشا آن غم که یکروز است و یکماه است و یکسال است .. چه باید با غمت کردن که …
❤5
جنون زلف هایت برده از من باز ، بازی را .. بیا پایان بده مردانه این گیسو درازی را !! بکش ابرو ، بزن چاقو ، بده مرهم ، خدایی کن .. به شدت دوست دارم این مدل بنده نوازی را !! تمام پاره خط های تنم را قطع کن با وصل .. بر اندازیم این قانون خط های موازی را !! فقط تو میتوانی قاتل یک شهر باشی ، بعد .. به یک لبخند برداری کلاه هر چه قاضی را !! بیا با اتحادی مزدوج حل شو در آغوشم .. که از بنیاد برداریم اضلاع ریاضی را !! دهان…
👌3❤2
بارها میوہ ے ممنوعہ تعارف شد و من یادِ چشمانِ تو وُ سیبِ لبت افتادم مطمئن باش تو "حوا"یے و من "آدم"ِ تو "من از آن روز ڪہ در بند توام آزادم" آرشمهدیپور @Onlyshear
❤2👌1
اینکه دلتنگت نخواهم شد ، دروغی بیش نیست .. هیچ مردی از نبرد عشق صادق برنگشت !! #هادی_معراجی @Onlyshear
❤3👌1
@Onlyshear
❤1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @onlyshear. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 252,753 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 84 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@onlyshear named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سرای شعر” (@onlyshear), 9,425 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyshear.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.