Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OnlyUp | Low MC Insider Plays 🚀

Channel

OnlyUp | Low MC Insider Plays 🚀

@onlyupcall

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

209subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180666986
TypeChannel
Username@onlyupcall
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/onlyupcall

Growth

2092112107 August 2026 — 211 subscribers8 August 2026 — 211 subscribers30 August 2026 — 209 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:45209-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:02211no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:00211first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5463122435425448565342.9%
custom 5373174941095050893228.6%
custom 5463054218459884779114.3%
custom 5465465194056525619114.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jun 2026, 23:08 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026

Be careful of this fake pump from Trumps tweet... Iran have confirmed they will be striking with full force this week. The BTC fall is not over yet... and I certainly wouldn't be looking at a long thinking $60k was the bottom. Stay cautious boys, we're not out of the woods just yet! 🫡

2 Jun 2026, 14:29 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: Bitcoin crashes under $68,000 @WatcherGuru

2 Jun 2026, 09:58 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026

So I was 2 days off my calc but get ready for a horrible downtrend to low $60k's If you're in longs I would seriously consider reducing size to protect you here.

28 May 2026, 08:17 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Not often the 1D prints a SELL on BTC… 👀 Look at the serious downside expansion that happens when my indicator flags a SELL. If the support breaks at the MID/LOW $60k's things could get interesting very quickly. Hopefully some positive news about the war very soon... 🫠 #OnlyUp

27 May 2026, 22:57 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026

Huge bearish sentiment on $BTC We will see the $68,000 range by the end of May.

1 May 2026, 09:56 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026

Launch on SOL coming very soon! 🚀 Notifications ON 😎

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @onlyupcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OnlyUp | Low MC Insider Plays 🚀” (@onlyupcall), 209 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyupcall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.