Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Oobit - Pay with crypto

Channel

Oobit - Pay with crypto

@oobitap

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

6,110subscribers

-717 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002423368958
TypeChannel
Username@oobitap
DescriptionThe #1 app for crypto spenders. Backed by Tether, trusted by millions. Get updates and 24/7 support in this channel. 📱App: https://oobit.app/R9EK/TAP1 🌎 Website: https://www.oobit.com/crypto-card 💬 Chat: @OobitEN 🆘 Help: @Oobitwolf
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/oobitap

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1106,8276,468.57 August 2026 — 6,827 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,824 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,807 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,782 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,757 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,728 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,682 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,661 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,633 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,609 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,567 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,526 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,497 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,460 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,392 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,339 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,294 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,257 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,224 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,208 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,178 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,160 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,129 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,110 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 87 days, net -717. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,002–6,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 01:466,110-19
31 Oct 2026, 08:596,129-31
28 Oct 2026, 08:396,160-18
25 Oct 2026, 09:266,178-30
21 Oct 2026, 22:366,208-16
19 Oct 2026, 00:066,224-33
15 Oct 2026, 16:546,257-37
13 Oct 2026, 01:486,294-45
6 Oct 2026, 14:596,339-53
29 Sept 2026, 15:016,392-68
19 Sept 2026, 12:566,460-37
15 Sept 2026, 00:396,497-29
11 Sept 2026, 00:376,526-41
6 Sept 2026, 07:166,567-42
2 Sept 2026, 10:076,609-24
30 Aug 2026, 15:446,633-28
27 Aug 2026, 09:576,661-21
23 Aug 2026, 23:146,682-46
20 Aug 2026, 13:376,728-29
17 Aug 2026, 17:566,757first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.18%
avg views ÷ 6,110 subscribers
Avg views / post
195
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.355%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held50 (2 June 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total3,892
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
142
Videos
47
Links
502

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3458.6%
❤‍🔥712.1%
😭712.1%
👍58.62%
🔥58.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC121 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Everyone's teaching their AI to shop. Nobody's teaching it to pay. We did. 🩷 Stablecoins, your own wallet, your yes. Forward this to the friend whose AI would blow the budget in a day. 😅 https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

31 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC130 viewsread 4 November 2026

Agents spending USDT. Not someday. It's live on Oobit now. 🩷 Your AI finds it. You approve it. Your stablecoins pay for it. Forward this to the friend who still thinks AI can only chat. https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

31 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC133 viewsread 4 November 2026

GM Oobit Fam! ☀️ Touch grass today. Your crypto can come with you. 🌱 Reply GM + where you're spending your Saturday 👇 https://www.oobit.com

Signed Social Media Connector

30 Oct 2026, 18:00 UTC148 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Greatness moves differently. 🌎 Live borderless. Live Oobit. The weekend's here. Where's your crypto going tonight? Reply with one emoji 🍣🎟️✈️🍸 https://www.oobit.com/crypto-card

Signed Social Media Connector

30 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC150 viewsread 4 November 2026

🛒 Someone in our community just bought their protein without leaving the chat. They connected Oobit to their AI assistant, asked for it, approved it, and it was paid. That's the whole checkout now. 🤯 What's the first thing you'd order straight from a chat? 👇 https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

30 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC142 viewsread 4 November 2026

🔐 Your AI should never hold your bank login. Oobit is built user-first, permission-first: → It's paid from your stablecoins → Your AI never gets access to your funds → It asks, and you approve every purchase → Each buy gets its own one-time card Millions of agents. One rule: you come first. 🩷 React 🔐 if that's your rule too. https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

29 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC147 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🇧🇷 Heading to Brazil with USDT? Scan the local payment QR with Oobit. Pay with USDT. The merchant gets reais. No cash-out detour. Save this 🔖 and forward it to whoever's planning the trip. https://www.oobit.com

Signed Social Media Connector

29 Oct 2026, 06:01 UTC148 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Giving an AI your card is probably the wrong model. So we built something different. 💸 Your AI pays in stablecoins 👛 From your own wallet 🌎 Across borders, not only for people with the right bank card in the right country ✅ And only after you approve The AI gets what it needs to finish the purchase. Nothing more. Would you hand your AI a card? Reply YES or NO 👇 https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

28 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC135 viewsread 4 November 2026

Forward this to everyone who: → Asks AI to book, order and reorder for them → Wants every purchase to need their yes → Would rather pay with USDT than hand an AI their bank login You know at least one. 👇 https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

28 Oct 2026, 14:00 UTC140 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🌊 Live beyond the shore. Your money shouldn't have a coastline. Live borderless. Live Oobit. Reply 🌊 for beach or 🏔️ for mountains. Where's your next trip? https://www.oobit.com/crypto-card

Signed Social Media Connector

28 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC154 viewsread 4 November 2026

🤖 3 steps to let your AI pay, without giving it your money 1️⃣ Get Oobit. Your stablecoins stay in your own wallet. 2️⃣ Connect Oobit to the AI assistant you already use (setup is at the link). 3️⃣ Ask it to find something. It asks you first. You say yes. Done. Already connected? Comment 🤖 Not yet? Save this 🔖 for tonight. https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

27 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC190 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🎉 AI can now spend stablecoins. AI is moving from answering questions to doing things for you. To do that, it needs a way to pay. Not your card. Not access to your money. Your stablecoins. Your wallet. Your yes. 🩷 Every payment waits for your approval, and each one gets its own one-time card. React 🤖 if you'd let your AI pay. 👀 if you're still watching. https://www.oobit.com/ai-payments

Signed Social Media Connector

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @oobitap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q131718048 on Wikidata, read 1 November 2026
LabelOobit
Descriptionmobile app for cryptocurrencies payments
X / Twitter@oobit
YouTubeUCRPzf7--JB0op7yyqfEPEuQ
Official sitehttps://www.oobit.com

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oobit - Pay with crypto” (@oobitap), 6,110 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oobitap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.