هیچ انسانی در کل تاریخ بشر، کودنتر، بیهنرتر و لزجتر از حامد فرد نیست.
👍25🤣7❤4👎1👏1

Channel
@oonjoshahbaz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,237subscribers
+186 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002685625886 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oonjoshahbaz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oonjoshahbaz |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 1,237 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 1,233 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 1,224 | +4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 1,220 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 1,217 | +35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 1,182 | +21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 1,161 | +17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 1,144 | +13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 1,131 | +40 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 1,091 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 1,086 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 1,084 | +33 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 1,051 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 1,051 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
940 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 514 | 54.7% | |
| ❤ | 257 | 27.3% | |
| 👏 | 100 | 10.6% | |
| 🤣 | 44 | 4.68% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 1.38% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 1.17% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.106% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هیچ انسانی در کل تاریخ بشر، کودنتر، بیهنرتر و لزجتر از حامد فرد نیست.
👍25🤣7❤4👎1👏1
توسعه و آزادی سیاسی و دموکراسی به معنایِ «وزنکشی» نیست. به معنای برآوردنِ شرایطی است که بشود انتخاب کرد و از انتخاب پشیمان شد، بدون آنکه به انقلاب نیاز باشد. به این معناست که "اقلیت" حذف نشود و "اکثریت" امکان استبداد نیابد.
❤23👍9👏2
ما به معنای دقیق کلمه در دورانی "استبدادطلبانه" زندگی میکنیم. آنها که مستقرند که وضعشان روشن است، بسیاری از مدعیانِ مخالفت با وضع موجود نیز با تمام وجود اقتدارگرا، دگرستیز و استبدادطلبند. چنین است که وجود شما بدون ذرهای ادا و تعارف، امری شبشکن، امیدبخش و افقگشاست.
❤28👍19👏1🔥1
بلند و گرامی باد نام و یاد سردار اسعد، بیبی مریم، بزرگان تبریز، احمد کسروی، میرزاده عشقی و همه آنان که از دوران مشروطه تا به امروز علیه استبداد و سلطانیزم و برای آزادی کوشیدهاند.
❤41👍23
چقدر من از این جقله که شاگرد محمود سریعالقلم است و با افتخار دربارهیِ این ننگ حرف میزند و تیپ و قیافهاش شبیه معاونینِ مدیرانِ میانیِ نظام است و توی سگ تابستان کت و شلوارِ مدیریتی میپوشد، بیزارم.
👍26🤣8❤3👏1
یک حرف احمقانه را اگر تمام مردم جهان یکصدا تکرار کنند، باز هم احمقانه است. آدمهای شریف هم اگر یک حرف احمقانه را تکرار کنند باز هم آن حرف احمقانه است. اگر سخنی احمقانه را یک کهنسال حکیم، اگر یک جوان شجاع، اگر یک استاد دانشگاه، اگر بهترین فوتبالیست تاریخ، اگر سفرهدارِ محله، اگر اعتباردارِ بازار، اگر مادربزرگ، اگر برجستهترین شاعر تاریخ، اگر هر کس مطرح کند، باز هم آن سخن احمقانه است. سخن احمقانه، در هر حال احمقانه …
👍35❤21👏1
در برابر توانمندیهای دیگران تو چه مزیتی داری؟ گُنده و قدیمیام.
👍12❤4👎1🔥1
از همین روست که مدام توی گوشمان خواندند: «نه؛ منظور شاعر اینجا عشق الهی است.» گویی عشق مادی، علایق غیرآسمانی، سلایق زمینی، و اصلا کلِ زندگی یک ننگ است. آنچه اصل و معتبر و مهم است "آسمان و مرگ" است. وگرنه "زمین و زندگی" و این دنیای کثافت که فانی و میرا است. اصل قضیه تازه وقتی شروع میشود که هفتادمین فرغونِ خاک را بر جنازهمان بریزند. خب معلوم است وقتی زندگی و مادیات، تا این حد در چشممان پَست و بیارزش بنماید، تا …
👍23❤21👏3👎1
بله؛ تمام هم و غم من همین دنیاست. توی سر این جهان زدن و مخالفت با زندگی افتخار نیست. سراسر تاریخِ_به خصوص معاصرِ_ ما آلوده به خون و مصیبت شد، درست به همین دلیل که با سادگی، با خاکی بودن، با غریزی بودن، با اینجهانی بود، سر ستیز گذاشتیم. گمان کردیم فقط حرفی ارزشمند است که به هزار مفسر احتیاج داشته باشد. گمان داشتیم که هر کس پا بر زمین داشته باشد،خشتکی، لق، گناهکار و شیطان است. ما دنبال آسمان بودیم. سربههوا بودیم…
👍17❤9👎1
بله؛ تمام هم و غم من این دنیاست. توی سر این جهان زدن و مخالفت با زندگی افتخار نیست. سراسر تاریخِ_به خصوص معاصرِ_ ما آلوده به خون و مصیبت شد، درست به همین دلیل که با سادگی، با خاکی بودن، با غریزی بودن، با اینجهانی بود، سر ستیز گذاشتیم. گمان کردیم فقط حرفی ارزشمند است که به هزار مفسر احتیاج داشته باشد. گمان داشتیم که هر کس پا بر زمین داشته باشد،خشتکی، لق، گناهکار و شیطان است. ما دنبال آسمان بودیم. سربههوا بودیم …
👍47❤21👏4🔥1
تیپ کامل نظامی، با دمپایی تابستونی. مخوفقُلی.
🤣18👎3❤2👍1
خاطرتون هست بعد از عملیات طوفانالنَمنَه چه کسانی شیرینی پخش میکردند...؟
👍12🤣6👎4❤3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oonjoshahbaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اونجو(حسین شهبازیزاده)” (@oonjoshahbaz), 1,237 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oonjoshahbaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.