Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ИПИП | Институт Практической Интегративной Психологии

Channel

ИПИП | Институт Практической Интегративной Психологии

@oooipip3

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

608subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002218881960
TypeChannel
Username@oooipip3
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oooipip3

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

577608592.57 August 2026 — 577 subscribers8 August 2026 — 577 subscribers8 August 2026 — 581 subscribers16 August 2026 — 588 subscribers24 August 2026 — 594 subscribers31 August 2026 — 603 subscribers10 September 2026 — 607 subscribers17 September 2026 — 608 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 572–613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:21608+1
10 Sept 2026, 12:01607+4
31 Aug 2026, 22:17603+9
24 Aug 2026, 07:28594+6
16 Aug 2026, 20:07588+7
8 Aug 2026, 14:36581+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:21577no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:47577first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10086.2%
🔥97.76%
👍65.17%
💯10.862%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, хочу поделиться по итогам эфира про детские психологические травмы, которые я провела 4 августа у нас в ИПИП (кто упустил, можно посмотреть в записи вот тут) Конечно, наши дети живут в том же сложном и небезопасном мире, что и мы сами и никто не застрахован от травмы физической или психологической. НО! Большая часть сложностей возникает не столько из-за сложного опыта ребенка и даже не из-за ошибок в воспита

6

5 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC71 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже завтра 6 августа в 19.00 в рамках Летнего Лектория состоится онлайн встреча с Оксаной Цыпиной по теме Насилия. Вы сможете задать свои вопросы, обсудить кейсы клиентов, личные ситуации и разобраться в нюансах этой непростой темы. Получить лекции в записи и записаться на встречу можно здесь: https://oooipip.ru/lectorum Всех Жду! *встреча не записывается, все что будет на встрече останется на встрече #ИПИП_событи

5

4 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC81 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы можем прочитать сто книг по воспитанию, но пока наша собственная детская травма болит, мы будем неосознанно транслировать её дальше. А можем остановить этот процесс... Именно об этом — бережно, без чувства вины и нравоучений — мы поговорим сегодня на бесплатном эфире. Я приглашаю вас на лекцию «Детская психологическая травма». 🗓 Сегодня | ⏰ 19.00| 📍 Онлайн Приходите в это безопасное пространство. Здесь не нужн

8

3 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC84 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Человеку свойственно судить об окружающих по самому себе и это приводит порой к судьбоносным ошибкам в детско-родительских отношениях. Ребенок - это не маленький взрослый, это человек с совершенно иной пока организацией нервной системы, а это значит, что его реакция на психологическую травму (как и многое иное) будет совершенно не той, что ожидают увидеть взрослые. Порой ребенок не рыдает, не грустит, не выражает р

5

2 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC87 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Иллюзия «стерильного» детства: почему мы боимся детских слез? Мы привыкли вести интеллектуальные разговоры о детских травмах. Это стало модным, повседневным даже… Но парадокс в том, что как только речь заходит о наших собственных детях, включаются глубинные страхи и защитные механизмы. Родительское бессилие перед лицом чужой боли настолько тяжело, что проще сказать: «да ладно, это ерунда, не выдумывай». Давайте пос

16

1 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC87 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Осмысливаю прошедшую встречу наших выпускников ИПИП в Сергиевом Посаде, их выступления на конференции, путь который я наблюдала в течение года, состояние тех, кто выпустился год назад. Личные встречи очень важны всем! Нам важно обниматься, смотреть друг другу в глаза, смеяться, рассказывать истории, наряжаться, пить чай вместе - это делает нас людьми, это наполняет, этого требует наша биология, психология и просто че

10

31 Jul 2026, 06:10 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#ИПИП #ИПИП_преподаватели #ИПИП_консультации #ИПИП_вопрос_психологу #ИПИП_видео

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oooipip3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИПИП | Институт Практической Интегративной Психологии” (@oooipip3), 608 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oooipip3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.