Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رابعيون محمد هيثم

Channel

رابعيون محمد هيثم

@oorfff

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,908subscribers

+2,250 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003011703554
TypeChannel
Username@oorfff
Descriptionالقناة الرسمية "رابعيون محمد هيثم" كل ما يحتاجه طالب الرابع العلمي والادبي🤍. (ملخصات مرشحات نصائح ملازم) اختصاص رياضيات بوت التواصل @UTUlBOT
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/oorfff

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

22,100 average views per post against 25,908 subscribers — an engagement rate of 85.2%. Across the 1,323 registered channels in the same cohort — 11,234–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.08% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.39%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 September 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled397,300
Mature posts only95.7% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers25,908 measured 26 October 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 1,323 channels · p10 0.56% · p25 2.08% · p50 5.39% · p75 11.2% · p90 21.9%
Position in cohort99.773th percentile · 15.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.028% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

23,56526,48225,023.511 August 2026 — 23,658 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,676 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,658 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,639 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,632 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,713 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,747 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,763 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,753 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,759 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,758 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,762 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,731 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,732 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,746 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,754 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,712 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,713 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,629 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,610 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,613 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,600 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,581 subscribers7 September 2026 — 23,565 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,931 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,058 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,149 subscribers15 September 2026 — 24,184 subscribers17 September 2026 — 24,222 subscribers27 September 2026 — 26,482 subscribers4 October 2026 — 26,386 subscribers9 October 2026 — 26,083 subscribers13 October 2026 — 25,968 subscribers14 October 2026 — 25,898 subscribers15 October 2026 — 25,904 subscribers16 October 2026 — 25,852 subscribers17 October 2026 — 25,860 subscribers18 October 2026 — 25,882 subscribers19 October 2026 — 25,893 subscribers20 October 2026 — 25,917 subscribers21 October 2026 — 25,935 subscribers22 October 2026 — 25,943 subscribers23 October 2026 — 25,931 subscribers25 October 2026 — 25,912 subscribers26 October 2026 — 25,908 subscribers25,90811 August 202626 October 2026
45 measurements spanning 77 days, net +2,250. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,127–26,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 21:4025,908-4
25 Oct 2026, 20:3925,912-19
23 Oct 2026, 16:5525,931-12
22 Oct 2026, 19:1625,943+8
21 Oct 2026, 14:3625,935+18
20 Oct 2026, 11:4625,917+24
19 Oct 2026, 12:1925,893+11
18 Oct 2026, 14:5025,882+22
17 Oct 2026, 17:2925,860+8
16 Oct 2026, 19:3125,852-52
15 Oct 2026, 16:1125,904+6
14 Oct 2026, 16:5925,898-70
13 Oct 2026, 08:5425,968-115
9 Oct 2026, 06:5526,083-303
4 Oct 2026, 21:1626,386-96
27 Sept 2026, 08:5726,482+2,260
17 Sept 2026, 18:1724,222+38
15 Sept 2026, 16:1924,184+35
14 Sept 2026, 03:4124,149+91
12 Sept 2026, 08:5724,058first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 29 November 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.2%
avg views ÷ 25,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,100
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held38 (29 November 2025 – 26 October 2026)
Views total397,300
Reactions total8,328
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
145
Links
67

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

33,067 reactions across 38 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23,00069.6%
😭7,70223.3%
🔥2,3657.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2025 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 38 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oorfff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 November 2025 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Oct 2026, 21:20 UTC≈6,260 views277 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Forwarded from @oorttt

تعميم كتاب للمحافظات كافة بـ استثناء محافظات ( النجف - كربلاء - سامراء - الكاظمية ) فقط باعلان عطلة بالمناسبات الدينية باقي المحافظات لا يسمح لها بتعطيل الدوام الا باعلانها من مجلس الوزراء حصراً استناداً لقانون العطل https://t.me/oorttt ⭐️

❤167😭101🔥9

26 Oct 2026, 19:32 UTC≈9,410 views390 reactionsread 27 October 2026

#وزارة_التربية | ممنوع ارسال الواجبات عبر قنوات المدرسة بالتواصل الاجتماعي في أيام العطل https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤310😭49🔥31

26 Oct 2026, 19:30 UTC≈9,530 views311 reactionsread 27 October 2026

#وزارة التربية | ممنوع ارسال واجبات جديدة الى الطلبة بعد انتهاء الدوام الرسمي https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤253😭41🔥17

24 Oct 2026, 20:26 UTC≈14,700 views382 reactionsread 27 October 2026

تم التأكيد والتوضيح : فقط مدارس محافظة بغداد دوام رسمي والمحافظات التي لن تعلن التعطيل اصلا.. https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤235😭130🔥17

24 Oct 2026, 20:20 UTC≈14,500 views230 reactionsread 27 October 2026

#عاجل | تربية ميسان : غدا عطلة رسمية في جميع مدارس المحافظة https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤180😭38🔥12

24 Oct 2026, 20:18 UTC≈11,000 views263 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Forwarded from @oorttt

وزارة التربية : غداً دوام رسمي في المدارس https://t.me/oorttt ⭐️

😭188❤69🔥6

19 Oct 2026, 20:07 UTC≈27,800 views1,055 reactions1 Starread 27 October 2026

وزير التربية : سنعمل على منح كل طالب جهاز آيباد والاستغناء عن الطباعة العام المقبل https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤657😭267🔥131

19 Oct 2026, 16:56 UTC≈28,000 views312 reactions1 Starread 27 October 2026
File

⚪️ | ملخص جرائم حزب البعث ▫️رابع اعدادي https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤262😭34🔥16

19 Oct 2026, 16:54 UTC≈25,500 views213 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Photo

ملخص الفصل الاول تاريخ رابع أدبي ❤️‍🔥. https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤181😭20🔥12

19 Oct 2026, 16:53 UTC≈18,900 views238 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Photo

⚪️ | ملخص كلاميات الكيمياء ▫️الفصل الاول https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤207😭17🔥14

13 Oct 2026, 22:38 UTC≈27,400 views882 reactionsread 27 October 2026
File

وقد أغتدي والطيرُ في وكناتِها بمنجردٍ قيدِ الأوابدِ هيكلِ مِكَرٍّ مِفَرٍّ مُقبِلٍ مُدبِرٍ معًا كجلمودِ صخرٍ حطَّه السيلُ من عَلِ https://t.me/oorfff ⭐️

❤591😭208🔥83

13 Oct 2026, 07:53 UTC≈21,000 views227 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Forwarded from @oortttPhoto

عاجل | التربية تطلق التقديم الإلكتروني للانتساب وتحدد 30 تشرين الثاني موعدا نهائيا للتسجيل https://t.me/oorttt ⭐️

❤194😭26🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @oorfff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رابعيون محمد هيثم” (@oorfff), 25,908 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oorfff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.