Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Открытая социология Саха

Channel

Открытая социология Саха

@open_sociology

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

1,330subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393160225
TypeChannel
Username@open_sociology
Created19 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/open_sociology

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3151,3361,325.56 August 2026 — 1,333 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,331 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,329 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,327 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,324 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,319 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,315 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,317 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,329 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,336 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,335 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,331 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,330 subscribers1,3306 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,312–1,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:391,330-1
14 Sept 2026, 17:181,331-4
10 Sept 2026, 18:211,335-1
5 Sept 2026, 13:371,336+7
1 Sept 2026, 15:231,329+12
30 Aug 2026, 01:541,317+2
27 Aug 2026, 08:141,315-4
24 Aug 2026, 04:061,319-5
20 Aug 2026, 01:251,324-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:221,327-2
13 Aug 2026, 09:451,329-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:151,331-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:461,333first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1544.1%
👎720.6%
🤬38.82%
🤣25.88%
👍12.94%
💯12.94%
😐12.94%
😢12.94%
😱12.94%
🤔12.94%
🤯12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC108 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Жители столицы стали больше чувствовать себя в безопасности По результатам социологического опроса, проведенного в 2026 г., более половины (55%) опрошенных жителей Якутска чувствуют себя в безопасности. По сравнению с этими данными, в 2021 г. только 38% горожан чувствовали себя в безопасности. С чем связано повышение уровня чувство безопасности у жителей Якутска?

6 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @insider_best_tg

В АП готовят сценарий, при котором «Яблоко» снимут с выборов в Госдуму Наши источники в АП подтверждают: принципиальное решение по партии «Яблоко» принято. До выборов в Госдуму старейшую демократическую партию не допустят. Инсайдеры обращают внимание на то, как в последнее время активизировалась партия «Родина», которая буквально мочит «Яблоко» в публичном поле. Полномасштабная медийная атака санкционирована сверху.

👎3👍1

5 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC143 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vyakutiaruPhoto

⚡️ЦИК провёл жеребьёвку и утвердил порядок размещения 11 партий в бюллетене на выборах в Госдуму V Якутии.ру

1😐1

4 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC176 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MedvedevVesti

У Алексея Юрчака есть книга "Это было навсегда, пока не кончилось". Юрчак, американский социолог и антрополог, жил в России нынче работает в Беркли. Так вот в книге он вводит термин "воображаемый Запад". Ему посвящена целая глава. В чём суть. В 70–80-е советские люди покупали не только реально полезные западные вещи типа джинсы, пластинки. Они собирали совершенно бесполезные западные артефакты. Коллекции целые. Пус

4 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC193 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В графике голосования видны накрутки голосования за кандидата от ЕР. За Шамаева мы видим три волны массового голосования за него. Это могут быть боты или привлеченные голоса реальных пользователей телеграм, которые по команде голосуют за кандидата по ссылке. Рост количества голосов за Ноговицына и Заморщикову начался после репоста опроса ТГ-каналом SakhaDay, где концентрирована протестная, антивластная и либеральная

🤬2

4 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC478 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Динамика голосования за партии. За ЕР наблюдается резкий рос за короткое время в отличие от других партий. Однозначно, целенаправленная накрутка.

🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC228 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нехорошо, ЕР так накручивать голоса. 95% даже в Чечне это невозможно.

5🤬1

4 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC223 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Единая Россия+ 600 за секунду? 👍 Понятно кто в прошлый раз накрутки делал😂 Просмотров поста - 94, голосов 600+

2💯1😱1

4 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC217 viewsread 6 August 2026

Если посмотреть последние политические события, мы видим повторение некоторых политтехнологических фишек, использованных в 2023 году: 1. Айсен Николаев был на приеме у Президента РФ, где В.В. Путин продемонстрировал свою благосклонность. То же самое продемонстрировал Мишустин к Ил-Дархану во время визита в Якутию. 2. У нас появился 13-й Герой России. 3. Вспомнили третью годовщину кончины Первого Президента РЯ(Я),

4 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC182 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Секрет реванша ЕР на выборах в Ил-Тумэн (2023 г ) после поражения от КПРФ выборах в Госдуму в 2021 г. заключается в сложившейся благоприятной ситуации, состоящей из нескольких факторов: 1. Фактор прямой поддержки Президента РФ 2. Фактор СВО и подвига танкистов "Алёши" 3. Фактор смерти первого Президента М.Е. Николаева во время выборов.

👎3

4 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC190 viewsread 6 August 2026

В 2023 г. был пик патриотических настроений, способствовавший консолидации общества вокруг лидеров государства и партии власти. Все видели видео с подвигом танка "Алеша" и награждение медалью Герой России наших земляков с рук самого Президента страны. Уход из жизни популярнейшего в народе Первого Президента РС(Я) был использован полит технологами на 100%. Объявленный траур и пышные почести со стороны властей по ушедш

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @open_sociology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTCAnonymous Poll1,680 voters approx.

За какого кандидата от Якутии Вы проголосуете на выборах в Госдуму РФ?

  1. Айаан Васильев (КПРФ)11%
  2. Нюргуяна Заморщикова (Новые люди)15%
  3. Алексей Лаптев (Родина)0%
  4. Анатолий Ноговицын (Яблоко)19%
  5. Анна Сыромятникова (Зеленые)5%
  6. Гаврил Парахин (ЛДПР)2%
  7. Федот Тумусов (Справедливая Россия)6%
  8. Петр Шамаев (Единая Россия)40%
  9. Владимир Ю (Коммунисты России)1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ТОРБОЗНОЕ РАДИО
@Torboznoe_radio · 30,539
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
SD Новости Якутии
@sakhaday · 40,267
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 September 2026
Пряная Якутия
@pryanayayakutia · 21,929
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Якутск Вечерний
@yakutsk_vecherniy · 22,615
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

2023 Sakha head election (en.wikipedia.org)
“…[[State Duma]] (2021–present){{cite web|url=https://t.me/open_sociology/1078|website=t.me|title=Рейтинг возможных кандидатов на выборы…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Открытая социология Саха” (@open_sociology), 1,330 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/open_sociology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.