Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
53 measurements spanning 82 days, net +17,835. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,114–56,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Oct 2026, 20:50
38,605
+1
27 Oct 2026, 17:44
38,604
-18
26 Oct 2026, 15:27
38,622
-27
25 Oct 2026, 18:47
38,649
-13
24 Oct 2026, 20:50
38,662
-32
23 Oct 2026, 20:39
38,694
-1
22 Oct 2026, 19:48
38,695
-564
21 Oct 2026, 17:59
39,259
-5
20 Oct 2026, 13:05
39,264
+10
19 Oct 2026, 13:39
39,254
-1,796
18 Oct 2026, 11:45
41,050
-335
17 Oct 2026, 14:50
41,385
-566
16 Oct 2026, 17:30
41,951
-7
15 Oct 2026, 16:57
41,958
-9
14 Oct 2026, 15:57
41,967
-1,899
13 Oct 2026, 04:57
43,866
-189
8 Oct 2026, 21:40
44,055
-173
4 Oct 2026, 14:15
44,228
-6,851
26 Sept 2026, 10:58
51,079
-68
19 Sept 2026, 11:59
51,147
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 169 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 38,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,300
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held
39 (25 April 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total
56,540
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Oct 2026, 23:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
45
Videos
2
Links
40
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,438
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 39 we hold a reading for · 72%
Most on one post
358
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @openlibrecommunity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
12.8%
5 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
6,810
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
41,100
over 34 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 26 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Все знают притчу про варёную лягушку: если бросить её в кипяток, она выпрыгнет, а если греть воду медленно, не заметит подвоха и сварится.
Забавно, что на самом деле это миф. Ещё в XIX веке экспериментаторы выяснили, что обычная лягушка при нагреве спокойно выпрыгивает из воды. До конца сидели только те, кому предварительно удалили мозг. Жестокая была наука, да.
А вот на людях притча, похоже, работает куда лучше. В…
😀 Поднять VPN самому - интересно. Но когда доступ нужен сейчас, не всегда хочется снова чинить сервер, маршрут и подписку.
😀 ShVPN — готовое подключение со всеми актуальными протоколами для разных операторов, в том числе при «белых списках». Добавляете подписку в Happ, а обновления серверов получаете автоматически.
🎁 Бесплатный тест: 1 день сразу и ещё 3 дня после первого подключения.
Подключиться: ShVPN - Бот в Т…
принимаю заказы
Беру заказы и консультации по реверсу, программированию, сетевым технологиям и обходу блокировок, анализом приложений, протоколов, исследованием DPI и ТСПУ, разработкой софта, прокси, VPN и другими техническими задачами. Можете обращаться почти с любыми вопросами по этим темам. Особенно владельцы VPN сервисов, беру только большие заказы
Пишите @owenewans, сразу с описанием задачи.
❗️Лучший VPN в Telegram за 20₽❗️
❓Почему? А потому, ведь у нас реализовано собственное приложение на все платформы, собственные протоколы и безлимитные обходы, которые невозможно заблокировать❓
💳Платишь только за устройство.
💖YouTube без рекламы.
🌐15+ локаций для стабильности.
⌨️До 20 устройств.
🆓Безлимитный трафик.
💰Минимальная цена на рынке.
🔒OLC RTC и Amnezia WG на постояннке.
✅Reality VPN • ВАША БЕЗОПАС…
🚀 OLC ЗАКРЫЛСЯ? ИСПОЛЬЗУЙ ДРУГОЙ СПОСОБ ОБХОДА
⚫️ Мы предлагаем продукт лучше, чем твой впн
🤩 Сейчас докажем:
🔢🌟Безлимитный трафик
🔢🌟Работает Gemini и Банки на обходах
🔢🌟Уникальный сайт
🔢🌟Работает у всех операторов
🔢🌟Умная маршрутизация
🔢🌟Без лишних подписок и рассылок
🔢🌟ЖИВАЯ Тех. Поддержка
🔢🌟АвтоВыборы / Игровые сервера
🔢🌟Новые локации каждый час
😍 Котики на странице оформления подписки
🥰 ВПН создан для семьи…
OLCRTC ЗАКРЫВАЕТСЯ
ну, это примерно так и есть, архитектура устарела, все будет переписано когда нибудь, возможно появятся форки, к слову насчет max-proxy он будет в snolc, а почитать о snolc можно тут
канал / чат
🔱 ЛУЧШИЙ ПРОДУКТ НА РЫНКЕ ЗА 120Р
Аналоги?
⚜️ Наши преимущества :
✅ › Работает Gemini + на обходах
💰 › Лучший ценник на рынке за те же возможности
🏳️ › 20 серверов обхода + 20 обычных
⚡️ › Безлимитный трафик
📡 › Работает у всех операторов
🎁 › Пробник — 2 дня
🏦 › Работают банки на обходах 𖤐
⚙️ › Авто-Выборы / Авто-Обходы
🌍 › Каждый час новые локации
💻 › Сайт для покупки / управления
✨ › Собственный краси…
СТАТЬЯ ВЫШЛА
про Durev VPN, разумеется
канал / чат
Signed owenewans
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @openlibrecommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@openlibrecommunity edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 October 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ЕСТЬ ЛИ ТЕ КТО В ПОСЛЕДНЮЮ НЕДЕЛЮ ВЫБИЛ АЙПИ ИЗ БС У ЯНДЕКС КЛАУДА
выбил7%
не выбил93%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 26 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@openlibrecommunity named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@openlibrecimmunity named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“/b/openlibrecommunity” (@openlibrecommunity), 38,605 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/openlibrecommunity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.