Channel
@openmasha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
888subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002034006980 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @openmasha |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/openmasha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 888 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 890 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 891 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 897 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 898 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 897 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
258 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 62 | 24.0% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 12.0% | |
| 👎 | 31 | 12.0% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 9.69% | |
| 🤯 | 22 | 8.53% | |
| 😢 | 20 | 7.75% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 3.10% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 3.10% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 2.33% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 0.775% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.388% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️ WB запустит свой МЕССЕНДЖЕР — Татьяна Ким зарегистрировала несколько доменов, среди которых «wb-messenger», «chat-wb» и «чат-вб» Ранее стало известно, что сервис уже тестируют внутри компании, а в дальнейшем планируют открыть для российского и зарубежного рынка. Эту лихорадку не остановить 🤓
❤3🔥1😁1
В официальных комментариях в Максе нельзя приклеплять картинки
😁3👏1
Также в слитых в сеть экранках фильма не про колобка, в которые вставили маркированные интеграции, заменили песню иноагента на песню Леди Гаги
😢4
Мы тут сейчас смотрим экранку одного там фильма не про колобка на отечественном видеохостинге и туда один там банк добавил рекламную интеграцию с дипфейками актеров из фильма, которую (внимание!) замаркировал. В удивительное время живем!
😁9🔥2😱1
Хейтеры в запрещенке на моей личной странице им слишком много меня 😂
😁18🤯11👏2😡2
Рейтинги саратовских каналов в Макс
👍12👎10🔥4👏3🤬1
Запрещенка/Тикток
👍6
Росфинмониторинг пояснил, что в реестр террористов внесен лично Павел Дуров, а не мессенджер Telegram Пояснение от ведомства опубликовала в своем телеграм-канале глава «Лиги безопасного интернета» Екатерина Мизулина. 💬Перевожу на русский: покупать звезды, подарки, премиум и другие цифровые штуки на платформе можно💬, — добавила она. Между тем СМИ со вчерашнего дня, когда Дурову было предъявлено обвинение в содейств…
🤯4🤔1
⚡️Покупка Telegram Premium на данный момент не является наказуемым деянием, заявила "Известиям" адвокат и правозащитник Екатерина Кутузова. По её словам, действующее российское законодательство не содержит запрета на приобретение платной подписки в мессенджере, а также не устанавливает наказания за ее оплату.
👍7
🟪 MAX обошёл Telegram и занял первое место по месячному охвату в России По данным Mediascope, в июне месячный охват MAX составил 86,26 млн против 75,69 млн у Telegram. В апреле Telegram лидировал с 87,92 млн — минус 12 миллионов за два месяца. @AdMark
👎12😁9🤬4👍1🔥1
От «мы ведем переговоры» до «Дуров и телеграм террористы» два дня
👎9😁4🤔1😢1
⚡️Telegram могут признать террористическим ресурсом в России Депутат Госдумы Андрей Колесник не исключил такого сценария. Тот факт, что бот «Дайвинчик» есть в VK и «Максе» пока не комментируют (или не собираются). ❌ НМШ
🤯7🤬3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @openmasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маша ноет про TG и ИП, а ещё маркировка-шмаркировка” (@openmasha), 888 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/openmasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.