Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for офер

Channel

офер

@opher1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

9,852subscribers

-417 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001203434850
TypeChannel
Username@opher1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/opher1

Growth

9,85210,26910,060.57 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,266 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,261 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,260 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,261 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,258 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,259 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,227 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,216 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,217 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,213 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,205 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,194 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,187 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,185 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,179 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,176 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,184 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,123 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,000 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,852 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 26 days, net -417. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,789–10,332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:149,852-148
1 Sept 2026, 16:0710,000-123
31 Aug 2026, 19:1410,123-61
30 Aug 2026, 17:3410,184+8
28 Aug 2026, 19:1210,176-3
27 Aug 2026, 20:2310,179-6
26 Aug 2026, 17:5310,185-2
25 Aug 2026, 15:1710,187-7
24 Aug 2026, 17:3410,194-11
23 Aug 2026, 03:1410,205-8
21 Aug 2026, 13:1410,213-4
20 Aug 2026, 09:3610,217+1
19 Aug 2026, 09:0410,216-11
18 Aug 2026, 09:1210,227-26
17 Aug 2026, 12:3610,253+15
16 Aug 2026, 05:0710,238-21
14 Aug 2026, 15:1610,259+1
13 Aug 2026, 08:4810,258-3
12 Aug 2026, 10:0910,261+1
11 Aug 2026, 11:3510,260first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 9,852 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held48 (23 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total66,090
Reactions total1,659
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,998 reactions across 48 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,88594.3%
❤‍🔥502.50%
🍌402.00%
🔥180.901%
💔30.15%
🤬20.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,998 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
117
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 48 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @opher1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,050 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

глянул я тут игровой трейлер гта6.... к визуалу ваще 0 вопросов, очень красиво все сделали но худ... интерфейс выбора оружия это просто дерьмище кто смотрел, чо скажете? я вот все думаю, стоит ли вообще плойку и предзаказ брать... или хуй забить и ждать релиз на пк без лока 60 фпс, с обновленным худом итд

26

Signed офер

26 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,240 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

хай хотел дропнуть завтра проверку кейсов на мадже и ро но чот я пересмотрел то, что я заснял - в пизду))) лучше дельнуть и не буду выпускать такую анти-рекламу лудки чот черная полоса у меня в кейсах началась... тройная кобура та забрала всю ауру 29.08 госка на основе выйдет 30.08 на новом канале РО первый день в фсб а с сентября будет крайм на ро... там полный даркнет 😁

21

Signed офер

25 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,220 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

привяо давно ничо не писал сюда записываю контентик на России Онлайн ждите видосов много на новом канале скоро <3 сверху вам розыгрыш на мадже запустил на РО тоже розыгрыши будут на новом канале будет скорее всего по 100к прост буду ебашить на 3, как обычно (на ласт видосе на новом канале розыгрыша не будет) напишите в комменты чо ваще хотите видеть, чо снять на россии? крайм / госка / может еще чот хотите жду фидб

11

Signed офер

23 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,400 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

РОССИЯ ОНЛАЙН: ХУДШЕЕ ОТКРЫТИЕ САМОГО ДОЛГОЖДАННОГО ПРОЕКТА 🔗 СМОТРЕТЬ 🔗 🔗 СМОТРЕТЬ 🔗 🔗 СМОТРЕТЬ 🔗

5

Signed офер

23 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,440 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

я тут совершенно случайно обнаружил САМУЮ ГЛАВНУЮ недоработку на России Онлайн...... не поверите НО в цуме нет лоу-кротчей геттовских... я в ахуе.

6

Signed офер

23 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,410 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

приветики там кутуза открылась) я и номер телефона нормальный поймал, и квартирку хорошенькую ну и статик разумеется тоже ждем вечера как объявят лидеров гос ну и если кирюха вин - перехожу полноценно😇 кидайте скрины кто какие статики поймал, хвастайтесь и промик не забываем мой вводить!!! /promo opher

12

Signed офер

22 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,380 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

там кутуза открывается завтра в 12 если там повезет больше + сидней заберет лидерку — кажись туда перейду))))) ну я хуй знает, правда кроме статика ваще нихуя не повезло на арбате этом :( https://russia.online/register?utm_campaign=opher ❤️❤️❤️

9

Signed офер

22 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,360 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ХУДШИЙ СТАРТ и ПРОВАЛЬНОЕ ОТКРЫТИЕ нового проекта - РОССИЯ ОНЛАЙН 🔗 СМОТРЕТЬ 🔗 🔗 СМОТРЕТЬ 🔗 🔗 СМОТРЕТЬ 🔗

6

Signed офер

22 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,410 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

самое худшее мое открытие и вот почему: - я суммарно депнул около 60к рублей - большинство въебал в кейсы, и в моменте у меня был +- окуп в ноль, но в итоге я все слил в лудку - на 12 минуте видоса я ловил номер чуть ли не один из первых, у меня все шансы были забрать все 8, но я стопнулся и пошел дальше хуйней заниматься - на 13 минуте я мог спокойно конвертировать маджи в бабло и купить квартиру за 600к но опят

❤‍🔥11🍌6

Signed офер

22 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,370 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

видос уже на канале есчо, ссылку не дам прямую, тестим алгоритмы😈 ниже расскажу чуть позже про это открытие дополнительные мысли это было одно из самых неудачливых моих открытий на самом деле, пиздец тильтовая хуйня на самом деле 😔

9

Signed офер

22 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,460 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

какой-то нн хочет со мной коллабу? принимаем?

19

Signed офер

21 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,620 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

немногие знают, но у меня сейчас оба моих монтажора в отпуске и видео в данный момент монтирую именно я... сейчас куратор сказал, что в видео про РО нужно рекламить промо РО, а не маджестика зацените мои навыки монтажа в исправлении рекламы промо......

29🍌4

Signed офер

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @opher1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@opher1 edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 120,121 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“офер” (@opher1), 9,852 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/opher1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.