Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Olavo de Carvalho

Channel

Olavo de Carvalho

@opropriolavo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

36,416subscribers

-575 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275403038
TypeChannel
Username@opropriolavo
Created27 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/opropriolavo

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,41636,99136,703.56 August 2026 — 36,991 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,978 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,957 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,941 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,918 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,876 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,860 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,853 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,819 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,794 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,789 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,779 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,766 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,736 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,731 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,696 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,672 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,664 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,650 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,641 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,625 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,594 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,582 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,563 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,528 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,521 subscribers4 September 2026 — 36,501 subscribers6 September 2026 — 36,459 subscribers9 September 2026 — 36,416 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -575. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,330–37,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 15:3936,416-43
6 Sept 2026, 09:3836,459-42
4 Sept 2026, 01:3736,501-20
2 Sept 2026, 13:4536,521-7
1 Sept 2026, 11:2836,528-35
31 Aug 2026, 14:0336,563-19
30 Aug 2026, 14:3536,582-12
29 Aug 2026, 12:4836,594-31
28 Aug 2026, 10:4736,625-16
27 Aug 2026, 09:4836,641-9
26 Aug 2026, 09:3336,650-14
25 Aug 2026, 13:0436,664-8
24 Aug 2026, 16:3436,672-24
22 Aug 2026, 21:4336,696-35
21 Aug 2026, 09:3436,731-5
20 Aug 2026, 12:5236,736-30
19 Aug 2026, 16:2336,766-13
18 Aug 2026, 19:2536,779-10
17 Aug 2026, 17:5636,789-5
16 Aug 2026, 15:3636,794first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 7 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 36,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,330
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held32 (7 June 20257 September 2026)
Views total17,330
Reactions total289
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
203
Videos
68
Links
635

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 31s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,666 reactions across 32 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,18859.7%
👍1,24934.1%
🔥1133.08%
🎉350.955%
😁340.927%
👎220.6%
🤩110.3%
😱90.245%
😢50.136%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,666 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,120 views52 reactionsread 10 September 2026

🤔 QUEM DECIDE POR VOCÊ ENQUANTO VOCÊ OPINA? Existe uma diferença enorme entre ter opiniões políticas e poder efetivamente agir. 📅 Na aula Origens do Poder, no dia 10/09, você vai encontrar um ponto central da análise do professor Olavo de Carvalho: não basta saber o que aconteceu. É preciso descobrir por que aconteceu. 🎓 Conteúdo inédito! 👉 Inscreva-se: https://bit.ly/odp_wpp_grupo

👍4011🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC≈4,210 views44 reactionsread 10 September 2026

🚨 E se você estiver olhando para a política pelo lugar errado? No dia 10 de setembro, você poderá assistir gratuitamente a Origens do Poder, uma aula especial com um material inédito do professor Olavo de Carvalho. Você vai entender por que, segundo Olavo, eleições são apenas um dos inúmeros mecanismos que compõem a política e conhecer as bases da análise política. 🎓 A inscrição é gratuita, basta clicar no link ab

37🔥4👍3

30 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈6,010 views102 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

🚨 Olavo dizia que essa é uma das crenças mais comuns do nosso tempo: "A maioria deles acredita assim: ah, o comunismo acabou. Bom, de certo modo, essa frase não está totalmente errada, porque o comunismo, com a sua fórmula clássica, né, leninista, estalinista, de fato acabou. Mas foi transmutado por uma nova estratégia infinitamente mais perigosa." Só que o movimento não desapareceu. Ele foi comprado. Os grandes c

👍7127🔥3🤩1

28 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈4,990 views91 reactionsread 10 September 2026

🚨 O professor Olavo disse isso aos próprios alunos: "O pessoal conservador está muito errado ao pensar que o problema no Brasil é a esquerda. Já passou essa época. A esquerda já fez o seu trabalho, já destruiu a alta cultura, e vocês mesmo, todos vocês da direita, são consequência disso." 👉 Se o problema é o adversário, a solução é sempre externa: derrotar, remover, substituir. 🔑 Se o problema é a formação, a solu

62👍27🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈3,170 views45 reactionsread 19 August 2026

⏰ TERMINA HOJE! Esta é a última oportunidade para entrar no curso Metafísica: A Estrutura do Ser, do professor Olavo de Carvalho, com 50% OFF. 📚 6 aulas, +18 horas de conteúdo, versão remasterizada, decupagem exclusiva, resumos estruturados, 12 meses de acesso e garantia de 7 dias. 👉 Garanta sua vaga antes do encerramento: https://bit.ly/metafisica_wpp

👍3212🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈3,640 views50 reactionsread 19 August 2026

⏳ Entramos na reta final do relançamento. Metafísica: A Estrutura do Ser foi cuidadosamente remasterizado, preservando o conteúdo original e oferecendo uma experiência de estudo muito superior. 📚 Você terá acesso a: ✨ 6 aulas e mais de 18 horas de conteúdo 🎧 Áudio e vídeo remasterizados 📑 Decupagem exclusiva de cada aula 📝 Resumo estruturado para facilitar os estudos 🕒 12 meses de acesso pela plataforma 🎁 A condi

32👍17🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC≈4,680 views68 reactionsread 19 August 2026

As inscrições para o curso Metafísica: A Estrutura do Ser, do professor Olavo de Carvalho, estão reabertas. Acesse a versão remasterizada, com mais de 18 horas de conteúdo, seis aulas em sequência lógica e recursos inéditos para facilitar o estudo. Aproveite as condições especiais e estude um dos cursos mais importantes para compreender os fundamentos da realidade. 👉 Acesse: https://bit.ly/metafisica_wpp

👍5113🔥4

30 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC≈5,050 views88 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Desconfiar da própria percepção: eis o primeiro passo para transformar homens inteligentes em marionetes manipuláveis. 📆 Amanhã de manhã será relançado o curso Metafísica: A Estrutura do Ser — seis aulas com o professor Olavo de Carvalho, remasterizadas em áudio e vídeo, com mais de 18h de conteúdo exclusivo. Neste curso, Olavo aprofunda o tema da Metafísica e devolve ao aluno o critério para distinguir fatos de in

57👍28🤩2🔥1

24 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC≈7,220 views52 reactionsread 19 August 2026

🚨 As matrículas com preço especial de lançamento encerram hoje à meia-noite. Se você está esperando um sinal, este é o sinal. 10 aulas. Uma trilha com começo, meio e fim. Professor com dissertação de mestrado dedicada inteiramente à obra de Mário Ferreira dos Santos. Garantia de 7 dias. Depois dessa meia-noite, esse preço não volta. Acesse a página: https://bit.ly/mfs_wpp

37👍12🎉2😱1

23 Jun 2026, 13:16 UTC≈7,130 views46 reactionsread 19 August 2026

🎁 E tem uma surpresa para os primeiros alunos. Além dos 60% de desconto de lançamento no curso inédito A Decadialética de Mário Ferreira dos Santos, quem se inscrever nas primeiras 72 horas terá acesso a um bônus exclusivo: 📚 2 aulas ao vivo com o professor Elvis Amsterdã, dedicadas a perguntas, dúvidas e aprofundamentos sobre o conteúdo do curso. Uma oportunidade rara de estudar diretamente com um pesquisador que

35👍9🎉2

22 Jun 2026, 13:38 UTC≈7,180 views63 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Você estudou com o professor Olavo. Mas há uma parte dos estudos dele que nunca foi explorada no COF. O professor Olavo chamava a obra de Mário Ferreira dos Santos de "uma grande catedral filosófica". Usava a Decadialética como fundamento. Mas nunca abriu essa porta de estudo específico dentro do COF. Hoje essa porta se abre. A Decadialética de Mário Ferreira dos Santos — 10 aulas com o professor Elvis Amsterdã,

👍4516👎1🤩1

21 Jun 2026, 18:24 UTC≈6,240 views47 reactionsread 19 August 2026

⏰ *Amanhã de manhã, 60%OFF por poucas horas*. Amanhã abriremos as matrículas para a primeira turma do curso inédito *A Decadialética de Mário Ferreira dos Santos*, com o professor Elvis Amsterdã, mestre em Filosofia pela UFSC e pesquisador do acervo pessoal de Mário. 📚 *Com 60% de desconto só para os primeiros inscritos:* por até *12x de R$21,51*. O curso ensina o método que Mário criou para analisar qualquer fat

34👍12🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @opropriolavo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q729048 on Wikidata, read 6 September 2026
LabelOlavo de Carvalho
DescriptionBrazilian journalist, writer, astrologer, essayist, polemicist, digital influencer and ideologue (1947-2022)
X / Twitter@opropriolavo
YouTubeUC6RQhzm93SterWntL7GzqYQ
Official sitehttps://blogdoolavo.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Olavo de Carvalho” (@opropriolavo), 36,416 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/opropriolavo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.