9 measurements spanning 27 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,083–4,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 21:07
4,095
-10
29 Aug 2026, 11:16
4,105
+9
26 Aug 2026, 15:23
4,096
+10
23 Aug 2026, 21:45
4,086
-5
20 Aug 2026, 05:23
4,091
-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:47
4,093
-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:36
4,095
-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:17
4,098
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:37
4,098
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.62%
avg views ÷ 4,095 subscribers
Avg views / post
312
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
22 (23 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,248
Reactions total
38
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
198 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
133
67.2%
🔥
49
24.7%
❤
10
5.05%
👌
4
2.02%
🙏
2
1.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @option_lab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🏁 На бирже АЕ в 8:00 UTC прошла экспирация опционов серии 07.08.2026 по расчетным ценам фьючерсов:
• SPYU26 773,26
• QQQU26 720,76
• BTCU26 64662
• ETHU26 1910,3
• GOLDU26 4304,1
По опционам в деньгах (ITM) осуществляется поставка базового фьючерса.
Проверьте позиции и достаточность средств обеспечения.
Торгуй опционами с комиссией 🀄️ 👉 ae.exchange.
📚 Термин дня: Тета-распад (Theta Decay)
Тета — сколько стоимости опцион теряет за день просто от того, что время идёт.
И распад нелинейный: чем ближе экспирация, тем быстрее тает премия. В последнюю неделю — особенно резко.
Тета — враг покупателя и друг продавца. Каждый день ожидания стоит денег ⏳
📊 Разбор идеи: заработок на боковике и лёгком росте QQQ
Друзья, разбираем интересную конструкцию на QQQ экспирация опционов 28 августа.
Состав:
🟢 +100 пут 700
🔴 −100 пут 710
🔴 −100 колл 760
Проданный пут спред 710/700 плюс проданный дальний колл 760. Продаём премию, живём на распаде времени.
⚙️ Тета +28,82 работает в нашу пользу, пока цена в коридоре 710–760. Дельта −15,6 — лёгкий медвежий уклон.
📈 Расчёт на сце…
📚 Термин дня: Ассигнация (Assignment)
Ассигнация — когда покупатель опциона исполняет своё право, и вам, как продавцу, приходит обязательство: купить или продать базовый актив.
Для продавца это всегда риск: особенно у американских опционов, где исполнить могут в любой момент.
Продали опцион — всегда держите в уме, что вас могут «назначить» ⚡️
🎉 0% комиссии на опционы — продлеваем на август!
Друзья, вы высказались — мы услышали ⚡️
Мы провели опрос о продлении режима нулевой комиссии на опционы, и результат говорит сам за себя: 97% проголосовали за продление 🔥
Значит, продолжаем: весь август — по-прежнему 0% комиссии на все опционы на AE 💎
Напомним, что это значит 👇
✅ Открываете и закрываете опционные позиции — без комиссии
✅ Строите любые стратегии — сп…
📅 Чего ждать на этой неделе: отчёты и макрокалендарь (3–7 августа)
Друзья, неделя мегакапов позади (Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Amazon отчитались), но расслабляться рано. Впереди — важные отчёты и главное макрособытие месяца 👇
📊 Ключевые отчёты недели:
🔷 Palantir — один из флагманов AI-сектора, за ним следит весь рынок
🔷 AMD — полупроводники, барометр спроса на AI-чипы
🔷 Eli Lilly, Caterpillar, Shopify, McDonald's, Cos…
📚 Термин дня: Max Pain
Max Pain — цена базового актива на экспирацию, при которой максимальное число опционов истекает бесполезными. То есть держатели опционов теряют больше всего.
Теория гласит: рынок часто «тянет» к этому уровню к экспирации.
Не закон, но полезный ориентир — многие смотрят max pain перед крупной экспирацией 🎯
🏁 На бирже АЕ в 8:00 UTC прошла экспирация июньских серий опционов 31.07.2026 по расчетным ценам фьючерсов:
• BTCU26 64340
• ETHU26 1898,1
• GOLDU26 4089,7
• SOLU26 74,03
• XRPU26 1,0851
• SPYU26 749,27
По опционам в деньгах осуществляется поставка базового фьючерса.
Проверьте позиции и достаточность средств обеспечения.
Торгуй опционами с комиссией 🀄️ 👉 ae.exchange.
📚 Термин дня: Скью (Skew)
Скью волатильности — разница в IV между опционами с разными страйками.
На большинстве рынков путы вне денег стоят дороже коллов: инвесторы платят за страховку от падения. Это «улыбка», перекошенная влево.
Скью показывает, чего боится рынок. Крутой put-скью = страх обвала 📉
Опционные стратегии на SPY и QQQ. Сравнительный анализ микроструктуры, волатильности и тактик опционной спекуляции
Отличный материал от нашего автора Flexo. К прочтению обязательно.
⚠️ Новое видео на канале!
5 ошибок продавца опционов, которые сливают депозит
80% продавцов опционов рано или поздно теряют счёт. Причина — не в стратегии, а в пяти конкретных ошибках, которые совершают почти все.
https://youtu.be/5gWMKeGptbE
👍9🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @option_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov @dtiAlgo · 38,060 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Биржа опционов” (@option_lab), 4,095 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/option_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.