Мне кажется или автор Орбитали показал свое лицо? СМОТРЕТЬ
❤3🔥1custom 53998448111025272751

Channel
@orbitalchemorg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
481subscribers
+74 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003590289440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orbitalchemorg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orbitalchemorg |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:17 | 481 | +2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 479 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 476 | +7 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 08:41 | 469 | +14 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 455 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 451 | +21 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 430 | +11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 419 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 412 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 408 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 407 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
145 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 79.3% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 8.97% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 5.52% | |
| custom 5399844811102527275 | 4 | 2.76% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.69% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.69% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.69% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мне кажется или автор Орбитали показал свое лицо? СМОТРЕТЬ
❤3🔥1custom 53998448111025272751
Хотелось бы порекомендовать канал моего приятеля. У него в тгк вы можете увидеть цепочки, которые он составляет сам по органике и неорганике, что он ботает сегодня и его прогресс, а также вопросы по теоретической химии. https://t.me/P15_3s23p3
❤5
Ребят, снова хочу попросить вас о помощи!❤️ Мне очень нужны фотографии различных органических цепочек превращений - олимпиадного уровня, неолимпиадного уровня, вообще без разницы. Буду благодарен каждому даже за 1 цепочку, p.s. а зачем мне нужны все эти органические цепочки, вы узнаете в конце августа, готовлю кое-что интересное) ОТПРАВИТЬ ЦЕПОЧКУ
❤5
Ребят, кому не сложно просьба проголосовать за канал, хочу его красиво для вас оформить: https://t.me/boost/orbitalchemorg
❤3custom 53998448111025272753
😐
❤9💋1
Первая 1000 лайков на видео у Орбитали! Хочу поблагодарить каждого, кто проявляет актив на моем канале - ставит лайки, пишет комментарии (даже если негативные), добавляет видео в избранные - все это помогает развитию Орбитали. Всем спасибо!
❤27💋1💘1
⚛️ ОДИН ПРИНЦИП, КОТОРЫЙ ОБЪЯСНЯЕТ ПОЛОВИНУ ОРГАНИКИ Почему карбоновые кислоты сильнее спиртов? Почему амиды слабее оснований, чем амины? Почему аллильные частицы устойчивее обычных? Во всех случаях работает одна идея: Чем лучше электроны или заряд распределены по нескольким атомам, тем обычно устойчивее частица. Это называется делокализацией электронов. 1. Почему карбоновые кислоты сильнее спиртов? После отщепления …
❤🔥8❤5
#олимпхим Орбиталь была немного неактивна в последнее время, давайте это испралвять - цепочка заключительного этапа всероса, решения присылать в комментарии!
❤8
Как выглядят эти группы: 1. Сbz-Cl 2. Boc 3. Fmoc-Cl
❤7🔥1
⚛️ ЗАЩИТНЫЕ ГРУППЫ Часть 1. Как защитить аминогруппу Свободная аминогруппа –NH₂ одновременно является нуклеофилом и основанием. Из-за этого она может: — вступить в реакцию раньше нужной функциональной группы; — связать кислотный реагент; — дать побочный продукт; — изменить направление всей реакции. Поэтому в многостадийном синтезе аминогруппу часто временно превращают в менее реакционноспособное производное. Общая ло…
❤10
⚛️ Вопрос к вам Сейчас в «Орбитали» стало намного больше людей, поэтому хочу понять, какие темы вам реально полезнее. Что разобрать следующим? Предлагайте идеи в комментариях. По самой популярной теме сделаю разбор ⚛️
#подумайсам Где здесь электрофильные центры? Куда может атаковать нуклеофил? От чего будет зависеть продукт реакции? Объясните ход ваших мыслей и изобразите полученный(ые) продукт(ы).
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @orbitalchemorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Орбиталь | Органическая химия” (@orbitalchemorg), 481 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orbitalchemorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.