Channel
@orenburg2020
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
279subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001474929753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orenburg2020 |
| Created | 11 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orenburg2020 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 279 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 278 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 277 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 278 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 277 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 277 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 14 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Прочитали для вас интересный материал о глобальной статистике выборов: http://vybor-naroda.org/vn_exclusive/298913-itogi-goda-obzor-jelektoralnogo-cikla-2025-goda-i-prognozy-na-2026-god.html. Основные тезисы: - в 2025 году выборы прошли в 69 странах и зависимых территориях; - всего 96 избирательных кампаний национального уровня; - 14 случаев досрочных выборов; - 11 референдумов; - 87 «уникальных» дней голосовани…
Наши поздравления!
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Презентации номинантов на Политическую Премию Российской ассоциации по связям с общественностью (РАСО) «Гамбургский счет» за 2025 год Региональный уровень Лучшая кампания врио губернатора ✔️ Евгений Солнцев, Оренбургская область #РАСО #ГамбургскийСчет #politteh @politteh
Обыкновенное чудо... Сетап: не самый местный, не самый опытный и не самый медийный кандидат в губернаторы неожиданно для всех показывает феноменальный результат в 84%. Что кажется нелепым и даже опасным, в первую очередь, для него самого. Рассмотрим возможные причины. Если сказать просто: перестарались. Но как и почему? Отметаем с самого начала, что Солнцев – капризный и недалекий политик, которому захотелось высок…
Достучаться до небес. Или Солнцев и 84 процента Официальные итоги выборов губернатора Оренбургской области: - Евгений Солнцев - 83,85% - Денис Батурин - 5,93% - Рамиль Гафаров - 3,29% - Оксана Набатчикова - 2,99% - Карина Салихова - 2,41% - Недействительные бюллетени - 1,5% - Явка - 49,37% Итак, врио становится губернатором, показав результат почти 84%. Намного выше всех прогнозов (70-75%) и заметно больше Паслера …
Итак, результаты выборов - первые мысли. Почти неизвестный оренбуржцам единоросс Солнцев набрал 83,85% голосов (в такой же ситуации почти неизвестный единоросс Паслер в 2019 году выдал куда более скромный результат - 65,94%). Коммунисты (в смысле, КПРФ) при этом потерпели оглушительное фиаско: Батурин взял лишь 5,93% (в 2019 году у Амелина было 23,72%). Да что там - Батурин даже не смог выцарапать победу у не самог…
20:00. Избирательные участки закрыты. Мой прогноз 🔻 Явка не дотянется до 50% 🔻 Губернаторские выборы: Солнцев - 70%, Батурин - 12-13%, остальные кандидаты - в пределах 5-7 процентов. 🔻Горсовет Оренбурга (партийные списки): ЕР - 51-53%, КПРФ - 18-20%, СР, НЛ, ЛДПР - 5-7%, «Коммунисты России» не пройдут барьер. В Горсовете будет пять партий, но вместо «Пенсионеров» - «Новые люди». @komissar4ik
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @orenburg2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оренбург. Выборы” (@orenburg2020), 279 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orenburg2020.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.